| Author |
Trouble With Thrasher?
|
|
|
|
I've had attempted posts thru Thrasher remailer disappear without
a trace during the past day or so. Stats sources show the remailer
as up and running. Anybody else have a problem with it?
Thanks,
joe
| |
| Thrasher Admin 2006-01-29, 8:50 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <BH0CPHP538746.8327199074@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (joe) wrote:
>
>
>
> I've had attempted posts thru Thrasher remailer disappear without
> a trace during the past day or so. Stats sources show the remailer
> as up and running. Anybody else have a problem with it?
Hi Joe
I'm not aware of any problems at the moment. Have you checked to see if the
newsgroup you are posting to is listed in the "Blocked Newsgroups" list? (a
copy of which is below)
ANON-POST-TO - BLOCKED NEWSGROUPS
dfw.*
alt.fan.prettyboy
alt.oyp.sworp
alt.spam
news.admin.net-abuse.*
- --
Cheers,
Thrasher...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBQ90BZme9vBuCUlx7AQE6lAgAkXIUeolw
W6z5OCNFljhX24ueLEmLpf6E
fSwhyd4gZEQ1LeF8ar3LPU72+GMBS5fqBzFc1o3X
z+FmcHGWp8QIuDyQmT2VN4yk
CFzPRfNhcf4hpX2skhgHnL/ 7mZpFeCkYF3qNFEIvKg0cgV76QsbeeYUzDYy7Et+
k
tr4SguWQzK0avDzLiZgxLbYLAfm0rJxgbePdPM9Z
VZ9MtFJCt9XKVxrF5MIS5WEL
Gk99WmvddxszmB/ bUVutFeuBrcz7WDq6lUbw5UePVdtfOCJHFvNshNI
NlRCUi9v+
PzDHfmmMxx7trvL99hh+Cmzy/In9dGfN/W1f1FOWMGf4cHvwNGL9/Q==
=3RtD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| A.Melon 2006-01-30, 2:46 am |
| In article <BH0CPHP538746.8327199074@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (joe) wrote:
>
>
>
> I've had attempted posts thru Thrasher remailer disappear without
> a trace during the past day or so. Stats sources show the remailer
> as up and running. Anybody else have a problem with it?
>
No.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-01-30, 2:46 am |
| On 30 Jan 2006, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (joe) wrote:
>I've had attempted posts thru Thrasher remailer disappear without
>a trace during the past day or so. Stats sources show the remailer
>as up and running. Anybody else have a problem with it?
>
>
>Thanks,
>joe
No problem at all.
|
|
|
|