Anonymous Servers - Re: [ANNOUNCE] Nosedive Remailer open for testing

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > January 2006 > Re: [ANNOUNCE] Nosedive Remailer open for testing





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: [ANNOUNCE] Nosedive Remailer open for testing
remailer@invalid.com

2006-01-30, 5:47 pm

-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext

In <drknv0$hbh$1@bananasplit.info> Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:39:13 +0000 (GMT), Anonymous wrote in
>Message-Id: <9be0dbccdb18a41026a87bec546a9c49@anon.bananasplit.info>:
>
>
>Yes, cleanfeed did kill it on my system as a binary in a non-binary
>group. I've whitelisted apa-s now to ensure this doesn't happen again.
>When I have time, I might modify cleanfeed to allow a higher binary
>lines count in specified groups, think this would be useful.
>
>Of course it doesn't make a lot of difference what I do if none of my
>peers propagate messages. The cleanfeed default allows 15 lines of
>binary-like data in a non-binary group. In this instance, I didn't
>filter the message as it didn't make it to me. I've added a couple of
>'suck' type peers to get around this.


This tells me that cleanfeed is broken. I've seen signatures with more armored
text in them than that.

-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com