|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > October 2006 > Attachments in Quicksilver?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Attachments in Quicksilver?
|
|
|
|
As far as I know remailers do not take attachments, which I actually
think is a good practise and for the own network survival I think it is
necessary.
But I have been reading through Quicksilver's manual and it talks about
attachments, I have also noticed that when composing messages
to groups Quicksilver has a button to attach files.
So can someone clarify if it is possible to use the remailers for
attachments? And if it is then what is the maxium size acceptable?
--
Email:sberafvp@zy1.arg
Decrypt with Caesar ROT13
| |
| Anonymous 2006-10-12, 1:14 pm |
| In article <op.thaf88ogvxmruv@host>
Melic <sberafvp@zy1.arg> wrote:
>
>
>
> As far as I know remailers do not take attachments, which I actually
> think is a good practise and for the own network survival I think it is
> necessary.
>
> But I have been reading through Quicksilver's manual and it talks about
> attachments, I have also noticed that when composing messages
> to groups Quicksilver has a button to attach files.
>
> So can someone clarify if it is possible to use the remailers for
> attachments? And if it is then what is the maxium size acceptable?
>
It's possible, but each remailer has their own size limit.
Generally though it's not a good idea.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-10-18, 1:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonymous schreef:
> In article <op.thaf88ogvxmruv@host>
> Melic <sberafvp@zy1.arg> wrote:
>
> It's possible, but each remailer has their own size limit.
> Generally though it's not a good idea.
Plus most remailers don't allow binaries. And they don't advertise this :-(
If you find an exit that allows binaries (and a news server that does
propagate it to you ;-) ). You can use it over and over again until its
config changes in a way that doesn't allow binaries.
Thomas
- --
"Give me what i need, or i take what i want"
Hanin Elias - Wanting a machine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRTYwjAEP2l8iXKAJAQHkngMggZ+jd99G
kkv5bNlegiAuO2YD5h4N4+tf
VRIHf90nb+ZOCEwiHSHHM4L3jdgG4R+XReJGhCBr
dKtFa6dgzHMHSFE3jpioxyi/
52HEW024Uvfa7ZM/hR59yoy2sE8uBDpCRrtpVw==
=0b6s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Twisty Creek Admin 2006-10-21, 1:13 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:47:57 +0200, "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl>
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>Anonymous schreef:
>
>Plus most remailers don't allow binaries. And they don't advertise this
>:-(
>
>If you find an exit that allows binaries (and a news server that does
>propagate it to you ;-) ). You can use it over and over again until its
>config changes in a way that doesn't allow binaries.
>
>Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Sorry, work does not permit me much time to participate in most
discussions.
But let me address this issue. First assume that all of the traffic in or
out of a re-mailer is monitored. All re-mailers are locatead in countries
that "share" intelligence. Look what happened to Thrasher. Reece said he
would be back after a few weeks. Reece is still not back after 6 months.
Makes you wonder doesn't it? And why you would call me the most paranoid
re-mailer operator you ever met, I am <BG>
I have no way and do not block any binaries (to the best of my knowledge).
My KLEN is 1,000. My goal is 100% reliability that a message will get
through.
Will someone be willing to try my re-mailer and tell me if I am wrong? Will
I pass a binary attachment?
But, think about it. Assuming all re-mailers are being watched, a message
that is large "because of the attachment" is easy to trace back to the
original sender. Any CPs or others are already "had" if they tried to use
the attachment of a binary.
Being lost in the crowd and using mixmaster is the best way to go. A
standard 28k message is lost in the crowd. Sending a 1 meg message through
re-mailers is the best way to partition yourself. You now become "dead
meat".
I am not an expert. I just operate a re-mailer because I believe in free
speech (and the right to own guns 
I trust you my friend to tell me if I am in error. Oh yeah, I don't have
any F#NG time to even think about reading posts or E-mail. Public or not.
I don't give a shit. (see what happens to an operator after a year?, you
get nasty
My warmest regards to a dear friend,
Twisty Creek Admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/ AwUBRTl83P9qPDhkRaWyEQLC6gCeP60CQaxL4Z8X
N5k9KA6t6+W1N60AnREQ
GrIv4um4ADu1phF3hfXkoqG5
=rORF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|