|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > October 2006 > Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
|
|
| MacIntosh 2006-10-22, 1:12 pm |
| Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down.
Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
| |
| Anonymous Remailer (austria) 2006-10-22, 7:12 pm |
|
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, MacIntosh <MacIntosh@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
>At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down.
>
>Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
All of them that work with any other software. See http://www.noreply.org/
for details.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-10-22, 7:12 pm |
| On Sun, 22 Oct 2006, MacIntosh <MacIntosh@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
>At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down.
>
>Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
All of them that work with any other software. See http://www.noreply.org/
for details.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-10-23, 1:12 pm |
| In article <odbnj2tdasvbgt3m494pad29upkavlqpvb@4ax.com>
MacIntosh <MacIntosh@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
> At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down.
>
> Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
I sentence you to reading the last 100 messages posted to alt.privacy.anon-
server six times each. Included in those messages are answers to your
questions posted very eloquently by multiple people.
I'm beginning to wonder not if you're a troll, but a bot.
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2006-10-29, 1:14 am |
| In article <s5q1k2tvk36q5t1lmbkh8m9qp7ffkpf8i0@4ax.com>
GourdMcVay <GourdMcVay@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> Which M2N+Remailer Works with QS?
>
> At moment lcs and dizum both seem to be down.
>
> Perhaps a remop can advise, so that we can start using QS again?
For the twelve millionth time, the m2n gateways have no way of
telling
if you're using QS or JBN or hand-rolling your messages.
The gateways work the same for everyone.
And, for the record, *THIS* message was sent with QS, so stop
asking this
dumbassed question and BUGGER OFF.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-10-30, 7:15 pm |
| In article <kqsck29vrspvj5l6p8d4ktat23ri2tqtsj@4ax.com>
DrErnstZundholz <DrErnstZundholz@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> A good question from the OP.
No, it's a stupid question.
> None of the M2N gateways seem to be functioning at the moment,
> whether with twisty, or even *,*.
Bullshit.
|
|
|
|
|