|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > November 2006 > broken remailers / nym servers?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
broken remailers / nym servers?
|
|
| Edward Langenback 2006-11-26, 1:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I'm doing a round of 'remailer-key' and 'remailer-conf' messages and got
several delivery failure notifications:
Why would I need RFC2554 authentication to send a key request?
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*** remailer-key@nym.exp.fousse.info
553 We do not relay without RFC2554 authentication.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*** remailer-key@nymph.paranoici.org
553 We do not relay without RFC2554 authentication.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*WHAT* problem with the sender!?!?!? *NOT* a usefull error message!
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*** remailer-key@nym.alias.net
553-There is a problem with sender <keys@peculiar.homeip.net>.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Why am I not surprized? Remailers should never use SORBS!
(or anyone else for that matter!)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*** remailer@eelbash.org
Error connecting to primary server '38.113.168.70'.
553 sorry, that address cannot accept mail from your IP address. RBL
message follows: Dynamic IP Addresses See:
http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?207.119.80.73
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT relaying??! I didn't try to relay anything.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
*** remailer-key@nym.at
513 Relaying denied.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRWnhpPu4FzRyppzVAQF99wgAn3NEkBBL
ItsGhd2G6cTfK3rp5GpyKADt
3ZHSDEkM+Rd0r4ePt1K892qPMCe85ESWbJJt9Rok
p50gcn7SytSIJ66Ji8v7HJAZ
1UhoMqAXsan74pKJLZs2UZVeUrW0G3yhYMDpIU/Dg2sxf7hUbiqvNJrVizq5OiC2
l8Q5GDHi1dnnIcxFuTgP5ASlJErdwo32FOxR/8XoPtraZqEPaQqa86sZNh7BSZkZ
lhLvGpgm8u97fUtz5N1tXs/rnK/+f03rdhY7eOSGlTOJ9zO4z0oyrk21chh9Gs7X
U0RQlA5v87IUnqD3x8Bm/9L3eZ6BEuqzyNoaRiAQrbiOSaOjiy31Cw==
=bZAU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| Eelbash Admin 2006-11-26, 1:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:56:30 +0000, Edward Langenback wrote:
>
> Why am I not surprized? Remailers should never use SORBS!
> (or anyone else for that matter!)
> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** remailer@eelbash.org
> Error connecting to primary server '38.113.168.70'.
> 553 sorry, that address cannot accept mail from your IP address. RBL
> message follows: Dynamic IP Addresses See:
> http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?207.119.80.73
You should be surprised: I despise sorbs, spews and the rest of those
totalitarian fanatics. Unfortunately, my isp uses sorbs and there is
nothing I can do about it short of finding another isp, and I don't feel
like making the effort
*.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFaeTDEC+g9Qawm6QRAssKAJ9h0EHO2/Sl/LjRyijiWfC4cwfmWgCgmgIf
YID9aXFeM2nNThb6xD0mCYg=
=Ln3Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-11-26, 7:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 26 Nov 2006, Edward Langenback wrote:
>I'm doing a round of 'remailer-key' and 'remailer-conf' messages and got
>several delivery failure notifications:
>
>Why would I need RFC2554 authentication to send a key request?
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** remailer-key@nym.exp.fousse.info
>553 We do not relay without RFC2554 authentication.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Do not know of such server.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** remailer-key@nymph.paranoici.org
>553 We do not relay without RFC2554 authentication.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Deceased.
>*WHAT* problem with the sender!?!?!? *NOT* a usefull error message!
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** remailer-key@nym.alias.net
>553-There is a problem with sender <keys@peculiar.homeip.net>.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Dead at this moment (and many moments).
>Why am I not surprized? Remailers should never use SORBS!
>(or anyone else for that matter!)
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** remailer@eelbash.org
>Error connecting to primary server '38.113.168.70'.
>553 sorry, that address cannot accept mail from your IP address. RBL
>message follows: Dynamic IP Addresses See:
>http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?207.119.80.73
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Eelbashism!
>WHAT relaying??! I didn't try to relay anything.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** remailer-key@nym.at
>513 Relaying denied.
>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Deceased.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRWjZAfRwi/ QFFzi5AQEEvwf+IaqtHtjxcp98Sm8dj4vQLhTWET
35Zk/i
VtBZGg0jXrZii9bpcGFn+kbv4n2J3PaYwarCm7so
H6lqg/x0QD51BFhxXaPImBiR
qXpj5kcH+WmiqKt7HPwSBDWe/AH05efzzdRcdHT0tCemssFyA4qRNeD49Z50GymS
7wPbj7iadduc71kF/ muSb3QVMFIlINjwBewKVrqJE8GdXMTUxhDqIB5tb
bln571c
A58+NAwmSep5kWLPKbLQMT5qQnlpQyDNHueyWPyg
5U03CKDq18C/YA6yOnDTauNB
W446PI58bXxbPP6/ Kr9FH4VGejTk7HpzZNqPaxYpIvO32kGeGlB2Og==
=Q2Af
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous 2006-11-26, 7:12 pm |
| In article <74576$4569e4f0$cef8886b$12762@TEKSAVVY.COM>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:56:30 +0000, Edward Langenback wrote:
>
>
> You should be surprised: I despise sorbs, spews and the rest of those
> totalitarian fanatics. Unfortunately, my isp uses sorbs and there is
> nothing I can do about it short of finding another isp, and I don't feel
> like making the effort
>
Sure there is, run your own MTA.
| |
| Edward Langenback 2006-11-27, 1:15 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0x06B09BA4
>Date:
>Status: INVALID (Unknown)
>
>On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:56:30 +0000, Edward Langenback wrote:
>
>
>You should be surprised: I despise sorbs, spews and the rest of those
>totalitarian fanatics. Unfortunately, my isp uses sorbs and there is
>nothing I can do about it short of finding another isp, and I don't feel
>like making the effort
How about doing like most remailer operators that defeat such totalitarian
fanatics by operating their own mail servers
Even *I* can manage to set up and operate a Mercury32 mailserver. It's
even secured against being an open relay. Setting up smtp auth wasn't all
that difficult at all. My only gripe is that it's TLS implementation
doesn't for smtp is broken/unreliable.
- --
The best way to get past my spam filter is to use pgp or
gnupg to encrypt your Mail to me with
RSA Key ID: 0x84D46604
(fingerprint: DA03 1EA4 7F5D DF74 B89F E871 757E 627C 84D4 6604)
This key can be found on public keyservers such as
http://keyserver.kjsl.com:11371/#extract
- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
God's Resting Place
http://lurasbookcase.com/gods-resting-place.shtml
/ \
\ / Join the ASCII-Ribbon Campaign to Stamp Out HTML Email !
X
/ \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRWjZAXV+YnyE1GYEAQKG4wf+OHQuM/CleJoB4VdduFHefSnpYLBDo5Eg
JJRtgww00vOMocLU5JKKhFEzvyWB4PV5iokTYspo
vbexX1XuO8KesCQPJSjwxy3h
mwuUTrOJAn65lZcMZDXQQqgdb5vpaO4U+fAOrQAH
nlaXR0htrftGZgFl6ctC6KYY
q/ kKChvdGWiG41ULBfnvE6Wwo2LqDsh7yqk4ZSAAbi
MuMgUWXUKNrfWfwmtzauxZ
Vh8THxcw/ rSIGzwf4zQ98Bm4JmWD0jYEufiPJzox6LT9AY9z1
3x+oKA9ckAT0RB+
yIONCpAbEp2R6OYrpIxuv0SpI/fIP57795M5PVzAJ+pKCRwIcYVj4A==
=6JDe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| Edward Langenback 2006-11-27, 1:15 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Nov 2006, BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]>
wrote:
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0x051738B9
>Date:
>Status: INVALID (Unknown)
>
>On 26 Nov 2006, Edward Langenback wrote:
>
>
>Do not know of such server.
Neither do I, that address is not one that i sent to.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Deceased.
>
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Dead at this moment (and many moments).
>
>
>Eelbashism!
>
>Deceased.
Thanks.
- --
The best way to get past my spam filter is to use pgp or
gnupg to encrypt your Mail to me with
RSA Key ID: 0x84D46604
(fingerprint: DA03 1EA4 7F5D DF74 B89F E871 757E 627C 84D4 6604)
This key can be found on public keyservers such as
http://keyserver.kjsl.com:11371/#extract
- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
God's Resting Place
http://lurasbookcase.com/gods-resting-place.shtml
/ \
\ / Join the ASCII-Ribbon Campaign to Stamp Out HTML Email !
X
/ \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRWjZAXV+YnyE1GYEAQJZtwf/fgyKG/iNAuJPjRc8cccdQQeNd3EiK9cF
CVxUdxfsGY8o2Qi7TDXNkpVxN+g1/cwY+Qgi1Xg0I+Baewgd8tVTVZjHI4Ry3a+3
POwX8pdsSgNcwnP+QYq+OwrF3BAAvbTQO+lfRCk/LhSlusSe4PW854FkqaXOIx1J
SOxceKPCBU23WAXkYDEsu6S/mmq8GJpTYlhBET/aV9ytGJzI5MPuvJEsB3HTPc1J
vqmaojw6TV1KKZEFbsEFIbTok4NpORsf/XgeHOULu5dmysdTnKGtmmfOcSsqghtY
lgPvopVIj+euWf8dUpHqiq7Noxfb8cv+6IGP11m0
BXsXvt5QYwQNsg==
=5WNv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-11-28, 1:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 27 Nov 2006, Edward Langenback wrote:
>On 26 Nov 2006, BiKiKii Admin wrote:
>
>Neither do I, that address is not one that i sent to.
>
Of recollection is correct... fousse ~ komite
Ciao!
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRWt8AfRwi/QFFzi5AQGPvAf/W/Pvh8meO3t3VfLGN0Ny9j/w4uYiEQR3
UMeGl3Mbt2uB8kZdmtOJhEYy/5mq6r5Sk6XVsb2E4obwAn7zp1IF3yI9JVyeAsyP
W4kPAg9J4mWSl+yY7QiIEz0g7JUPSwj+BGiwrVL3
+zvSgjnrGNudfBzQLVGD4rx+
4U76aFUwMmyDmQ36uBRMRBpCa2bflQhW5Hen7Pq3
JSAtMeNQ+MD+Wlgnfx/dQpuE
9rDHQZjXZzO25ngLl2s1UTqOpCd+pdedyt6Uy7tq
sWlJYVXvTvHewKeDbh5AI0V0
Y4AuX5QiuMCLos/ RvK+ZAwGLPlrYDuj9f57sUb2PfUG6X23y4SmZLw=
=
=cUnn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|