|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > December 2006 > these bomb threats
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
these bomb threats
|
|
| Nomen Nescio 2006-11-29, 7:13 pm |
| If they seized twistys computer and thrasher's computer, does that mean
they do not already have the keys to those remailers or that the
government run remailers could not trace the message through the chain
back to the sender?
But they did not seize the George Orwell remailer, even though they were
able to catch the person that sent the bomb threat, so does that mean that
the George Orwell remailer is a government plant, or that they have his
keys or that enough government run remailers were in the chain so that
they could trace the message back to the sender?
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-11-30, 1:14 am |
| Nomen Nescio wrote:
> If they seized twistys computer and thrasher's computer, does that
> mean they do not already have the keys to those remailers or that the
> government run remailers could not trace the message through the chain
> back to the sender?
>
> But they did not seize the George Orwell remailer, even though they
> were able to catch the person that sent the bomb threat, so does that
> mean that the George Orwell remailer is a government plant, or that
> they have his keys or that enough government run remailers were in
> the chain so that they could trace the message back to the sender?
It doesn't mean anything.
Why would you assume that this alleged person was allegedly caught due
to some flaw or compromise in the remailer network? There's a much
greater chance that the accused was suspect for some other reason, was
subsequently served with a warrant, and confessed or was confirmed as
the anonymous perpetrator in some other way.
That's assuming everything we read is factually true of course.
>
| |
| Anonymous 2006-11-30, 1:14 am |
| >> ...There's a much greater chance that the accused was suspect for some[vbcol=seagreen]
More mindless FUD from the Winston Smith puppets.
Anyone who uses a Winston Smith remailer is an idiot who deserves the
monitoring, tracing, tracking, and logging they do to mail touching thier
LAW ENFORCEMENT RUN subnet.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-11-30, 7:13 am |
| Anonymous wrote:
>
> More mindless FUD from the Winston Smith puppets.
>
> Anyone who uses a Winston Smith remailer is an idiot who deserves the
> monitoring, tracing, tracking, and logging they do to mail touching
> thier LAW ENFORCEMENT RUN subnet.
Kiddie bullshit. The poster is spot on and your remailer-trashing,
hypocritical, dingo-posting, worthless XXX knows it. Even out in the
real world people who send "anonymous" bomb threats are almost never
caught because the threat leads back to them. They're caught because
they have motives and vendettas, or they run their mouths to so called
friends. If you don't understand that already you need to have someone
chain hoist your fat XXX out from in front of the television. Maybe
permanently.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-11-30, 7:15 pm |
| In article < 6e5cf2e0c00caf012f509dfdf50734f9@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
> Kiddie bullshit. The poster is spot on and your remailer-trashing,
> hypocritical, dingo-posting, worthless XXX knows it.
LOL that line is so XXXXing funny! "dingo-posting" LOL~!!! Oh man, how
low can you go?
Actually, these days I hold dingo in high regard. Who can remember the
last time dingo was offline?
| |
| Dingo Admin 2006-11-30, 7:15 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 30 Nov 2006, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>In article < 6e5cf2e0c00caf012f509dfdf50734f9@mixmast
er.it>
>George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>LOL that line is so XXXXing funny! "dingo-posting" LOL~!!! Oh man, how
>low can you go?
Hey, now... There's nothing wrong with dingo-posting.
>
>
>Actually, these days I hold dingo in high regard. Who can remember the
>last time dingo was offline?
I can, but I'm not tellin'. <G>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRW9Zj8P4uvjsmaBlAQHKAAf6AjHIGZVX
CBOJ+blFoMMZ6tCVrS9Ymiym
k5P4f3nH6eqOjMjgPUXtqEgFrsIToWGmeevE37He
Se7/X7MwqG3UL4PWFIHoIUDK
3cwn7T+Gak4KF91Uo2e83fzKAL4Dttyn140ZLLm+
ZELJH3xO5c22mKjctVPzZRgA
UDB8pMsujXRfGrkdFrkXS6/ 8wTAsCEM61Mta3GYP3Tfk0kRMTY4aPLs1ReYkZIT
K
IXHzE9SC/3XOV6FNRGb8Q5vn0aSQsy0zmQ0GfXQ3YxtdM/WoT/Wnio89pCQ+r3Jn
gY62u3T6XXmFd5vMOKagrw/ZUvrJmZMS7SFmKu5huTiR8Jj3dfF8LA==
=0Eh7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-12-01, 1:15 am |
| Dingo Admin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On 30 Nov 2006, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> Hey, now... There's nothing wrong with dingo-posting.
No, and I think that's the whole point. The poster was a remailer
trashing TROLL posting through remailers.
>
>
> I can, but I'm not tellin'. <G>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQEVAwUBRW9Zj8P4uvjsmaBlAQHKAAf6AjHIGZVX
CBOJ+blFoMMZ6tCVrS9Ymiym
> k5P4f3nH6eqOjMjgPUXtqEgFrsIToWGmeevE37He
Se7/X7MwqG3UL4PWFIHoIUDK
> 3cwn7T+Gak4KF91Uo2e83fzKAL4Dttyn140ZLLm+
ZELJH3xO5c22mKjctVPzZRgA
> UDB8pMsujXRfGrkdFrkXS6/ 8wTAsCEM61Mta3GYP3Tfk0kRMTY4aPLs1ReYkZIT
K
> IXHzE9SC/3XOV6FNRGb8Q5vn0aSQsy0zmQ0GfXQ3YxtdM/WoT/Wnio89pCQ+r3Jn
> gY62u3T6XXmFd5vMOKagrw/ZUvrJmZMS7SFmKu5huTiR8Jj3dfF8LA==
> =0Eh7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
| |
| Oklahoma Joe 2006-12-03, 7:14 pm |
| Yea every time someone crys to you, you cut the group off and will not post
to it anymore, I think you are a cop.
Dingo Admin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On 30 Nov 2006, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> Hey, now... There's nothing wrong with dingo-posting.
>
>
> I can, but I'm not tellin'. <G>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQEVAwUBRW9Zj8P4uvjsmaBlAQHKAAf6AjHIGZVX
CBOJ+blFoMMZ6tCVrS9Ymiym
> k5P4f3nH6eqOjMjgPUXtqEgFrsIToWGmeevE37He
Se7/X7MwqG3UL4PWFIHoIUDK
> 3cwn7T+Gak4KF91Uo2e83fzKAL4Dttyn140ZLLm+
ZELJH3xO5c22mKjctVPzZRgA
> UDB8pMsujXRfGrkdFrkXS6/ 8wTAsCEM61Mta3GYP3Tfk0kRMTY4aPLs1ReYkZIT
K
> IXHzE9SC/3XOV6FNRGb8Q5vn0aSQsy0zmQ0GfXQ3YxtdM/WoT/Wnio89pCQ+r3Jn
> gY62u3T6XXmFd5vMOKagrw/ZUvrJmZMS7SFmKu5huTiR8Jj3dfF8LA==
> =0Eh7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least claim that I have no
prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little his way, on
account of his not having a fair show. All religions issue bibles against
him, and say the most injurious things about him, but we never hear his side.
We have none but evidence for the prosecution and yet we have rendered the
verdict. To my mind, this is irregular. It is un-English. It is un-American;
it is French. Without this precedent Dreyfus could not have been condemned.
As soon as I can get at the facts I will undertake his rehabilitation myself
if I can find an unpolitic publisher. It is a thing we ought to be willing to
do for anyone who is under a cloud. We may not pay him reverance, for that
would be indiscreet, but we can at least respect his talents. A person who
has for untold centuries maintained the imposing position of spiritual head
of four-fifths of the human race, and political head of the whole of it, must
be granted the possession of executive abilites of the loftiest order. In his
large presence the other popes and politicians shrink to midgets for the
microscope. I would like to see him. I would rather see him and shake him by
the tail than any member of the European concert.
| |
| Dingo Admin 2006-12-03, 7:14 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006, Oklahoma Joe <ok@nospam.com> wrote:
>Yea every time someone crys to you, you cut the group off and will not post
>to it anymore, I think you are a cop.
Where to begin? First of all, Joe, top posting makes it difficult to
follow a thread, so is considered rude by many.
Second of all, that's not true. Some groups have been cut off for good
reason, and I have just never gotten around to re enabling them. No one has
asked me too re enable specific groups, either. Third, If I were a cop, why
would I cut off groups? I wouldn't be worried about my ISP or anything like
that if I was a cop. That's just stupid.
And of course, what are YOU doing to promote the free exchange of ideas?
Besides bitching and moaning about the individuals who ARE doing something
about it?
Dingo Admin
dingoadmin@dingoremailer.com
>
>Dingo Admin wrote:
>
>
>--
>I have no special regard for Satan; but I can at least claim that I have no
>prejudice against him. It may even be that I lean a little his way, on
>account of his not having a fair show. All religions issue bibles against
>him, and say the most injurious things about him, but we never hear his side.
>We have none but evidence for the prosecution and yet we have rendered the
>verdict. To my mind, this is irregular. It is un-English. It is un-American;
>it is French. Without this precedent Dreyfus could not have been condemned.
>As soon as I can get at the facts I will undertake his rehabilitation myself
>if I can find an unpolitic publisher. It is a thing we ought to be willing to
>do for anyone who is under a cloud. We may not pay him reverance, for that
>would be indiscreet, but we can at least respect his talents. A person who
>has for untold centuries maintained the imposing position of spiritual head
>of four-fifths of the human race, and political head of the whole of it, must
>be granted the possession of executive abilites of the loftiest order. In his
>large presence the other popes and politicians shrink to midgets for the
>microscope. I would like to see him. I would rather see him and shake him by
>the tail than any member of the European concert.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRXNsWMP4uvjsmaBlAQGQrQf7BuDdP9gM
GMo4Ao1t+7RgreBFhOljDpQH
A5mPxwPKkeMZFOry3SK3uhT2NgJHHBgsRRUVJtCw
n6HQ9UrDyJhTI6qmptLrYJqY
TMt6uWa+5NGTJl3mWHV2t6o4jBPr3IPopaO7Pw55
LculTucEV1Tzc91bw6GTfizD
xS9zemyQtz2/vnivkjsXe07/ BfAMcN4wCZNCTHmGIUr9KUJq481UrlD87BKuAzzj
9XRQRpMK/1W6Kluwu/YLynq/ wtu+9y6SMKZ1Zi2tFFzvojhNfC06VlFzOU6odOJo
Nwr48T62C6Is+jmkQzlHXB8NeIa3LddpIcbmF7s7
6qtKiQHCK6mTNg==
=uJB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-12-04, 1:16 am |
|
X-No-Archive: yes
dingoadmin@dingoremailer.com wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Sun, 03 Dec 2006, Oklahoma Joe <ok@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>Second of all, that's not true. Some groups have been cut off for good
>reason, and I have just never gotten around to re enabling them. No one has
>asked me too re enable specific groups, either. Third, If I were a cop, why
>would I cut off groups? I wouldn't be worried about my ISP or anything like
>that if I was a cop. That's just stupid.
>
That's what I have been saying all along.
Smokey
|
|
|
|
|