Anonymous Servers - Re: Suggestion To Decrease Email Abuse And Avoid Seizure of Equipment b LEA

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > December 2006 > Re: Suggestion To Decrease Email Abuse And Avoid Seizure of Equipment b LEA





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Suggestion To Decrease Email Abuse And Avoid Seizure of Equipment b LEA
George Orwell

2006-12-01, 7:14 pm

Eelbash Admin wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 22:02:33 +0100, George Orwell wrote:
>
>
> I have no doubt, that when the first email shows up on the mailing
> list or the blog, somebody will see it, read the big, noticeable,
> disclaimer, and make sure that the opt-in mail is sent.


You lack doubt only because your mental acuity isn't developed enough to
see past the end of your nose. Not every blog or list has a snoopy
message voyeur like you salivating all over everything that passes
through their system. Most in fact are managed by people who invest a
psychologically _normal_ amount of time and effort in maintenance.
Something you've demonstrated an uncountable number of times you lack
the ability to do.

Your short sightedness is also made glaringly apparent by your use of
the pronoun "sombody". If a random "somebody" has the ability to
respond appropriately you've accomplished absolutely nothing in your
false jihad against what you see as abuse. In fact, the simplicity
with which email addreses can be forged makes the whole thing
unworkable without considering any of it's other gaping flaws. No, all
you've done come up with an scheme useful for build a nice, neat list of
people who want to communicate with anonymous remailer users.

Of course than that was your motive all along now wasn't it?

>
>
>
> You have it backwards. Anybody who wants to be safe from adolescent
> remailer users doesn't have to do anything; that's the nice part of
> this.
>
>
> If those guys are looking for threatening email, I assume they do
> plenty of scanning of all the incoming mail, since, according to you,
> there is too much email to examine manually, at least within a short
> period of time, which means they would catch the first email that the
> 'terrorist' sent, with its nasty words like 'bomb', 'kill',
> 'explode', read the big disclaimer, and send the simple email (not
> exactly something that has to be a 'crafted reply'), and opt in.


Your inability to grasp the scope of a problem is absolutely
astounding. You apparently lack the capacity to comprehend things
outside the myopia of your own pathetic life at the genetic level.

I refuse to waste any more time trying to educate a dullard. Why your
ridiculous idea is unworkable should be obvious to anyone with the IQ
of fruitcake. The bright side is, just like all your other pathetic
attempts to wedge yourself into some position of significance in the
remailer network community, this plan too will die a quick death after
a brief period of suffering by way of public ridicule.

I leave you to your daily delusions of worth.....





































Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com