|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > December 2006 > Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer
|
|
| [Anon] StopRemailerAbuse 2006-12-04, 7:14 pm |
| This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at mercurio.mixmaster.it. If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact mercurio-admin@mixmaster.it
Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer. We believe that this is a viable alternative. Remops can make their choice between running a middle man, running a standard opt-out exit remailer or running a opt-in exit remailer.
We think all three kinds can exist beside each other.
Sincerely
Remailer Anti Abuse Association (RAAA)
| |
| Eelbash Admin 2006-12-04, 7:14 pm |
| On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:26:19 +0100, [Anon] StopRemailerAbuse wrote:
> This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion server
> at mercurio.mixmaster.it. If you do not want to receive anonymous
> messages, please contact mercurio-admin@mixmaster.it
>
> Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer.
The code is good only for my particular remailer configuration. It's not
difficult to write, however, for any operator with even entry-level
experience in coding, which is about my level.
It would be ideal if somebody familiar with Reliable could build it into
that.
> We believe
> that this is a viable alternative. Remops can make their choice between
> running a middle man, running a standard opt-out exit remailer or running
> a opt-in exit remailer. We think all three kinds can exist beside each
> other.
I agree. It's a pity that remops have gone to middleman for email, even
though it is very understandable.
Making blocking email the default, while at the same time making it very
easy for the user to opt-in if he wants email, is probably the best public
relations setup an operator could ask for: he is engaging with the user
right at the start, with the first email that goes out, and showing the
user that the operator is not making him jump through hoops to avoid the
abuse that might come through emails.
It's a good way to make a remailer 'abuse-resistant'.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Remailer Anti Abuse Association (RAAA)
| |
| Anonymous 2006-12-05, 1:12 pm |
| On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, "[Anon] StopRemailerAbuse" <nobody@mixmaster.it>
wrote:
>This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
>server at mercurio.mixmaster.it. If you do not want to receive
>anonymous messages, please contact mercurio-admin@mixmaster.it
>
>Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer. We believe
>that this is a viable alternative. Remops can make their choice between
>running a middle man, running a standard opt-out exit remailer or running
>a opt-in exit remailer.
>We think all three kinds can exist beside each other.
>
>Sincerely
>
>Remailer Anti Abuse Association (RAAA)
SHUT UP EELBASH!
| |
| Anonyma 2006-12-05, 1:12 pm |
| On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, "[Anon] StopRemailerAbuse" <nobody@mixmaster.it>
wrote:
>This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
>server at mercurio.mixmaster.it. If you do not want to receive
>anonymous messages, please contact mercurio-admin@mixmaster.it
>
>Eelbash please share the code for the opt-in exit remailer. We believe
>that this is a viable alternative. Remops can make their choice between
>running a middle man, running a standard opt-out exit remailer or running
>a opt-in exit remailer.
>We think all three kinds can exist beside each other.
>
>Sincerely
>
>Remailer Anti Abuse Association (RAAA)
SHUT UP EELBASH!
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-12-05, 1:12 pm |
| Eelbash Admin wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:26:19 +0100, [Anon] StopRemailerAbuse wrote:
>
>
> The code is good only for my particular remailer configuration. It's
Translation:
There's something this proven snoop and censor doesn't want anyone to
see.
> not difficult to write, however, for any operator with even
> entry-level experience in coding, which is about my level.
>
> It would be ideal if somebody familiar with Reliable could build it
> into that.
You should try holding your breath until that happens.
>
>
>
> I agree. It's a pity that remops have gone to middleman for email,
> even though it is very understandable.
>
> Making blocking email the default, while at the same time making it
> very easy for the user to opt-in if he wants email, is probably the
> best public relations setup an operator could ask for: he is engaging
> with the user right at the start, with the first email that goes out,
> and showing the user that the operator is not making him jump through
> hoops to avoid the abuse that might come through emails.
>
> It's a good way to make a remailer 'abuse-resistant'.
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|