|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > December 2006 > [OmniMix] New release 0.9.9.3
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[OmniMix] New release 0.9.9.3
|
|
| Christian Danner 2006-12-16, 7:13 pm |
| Hi all!
I just uploaded OmniMix 0.9.9.3.
Most important is the addition of 'Whole Message Encryption', which is
a convenient method to exchange encrypted mails within a circle of
friends, either the normal way or through nym accounts:
Other than PGP frontends, which only allow to manipulate your message
before being sent by the mail client, a proxy server like OmniMix is
able to alter it as a whole, as long as the result still satisfies the
mail standards. Provided that the PGP keys of all recipients ('To:'
and 'Cc:') of a mail are available, OmniMix can be advised to encrypt
the entire message, including the complete header section, into one
single PGP message block and send it by means of a rudimentary header,
which has to contain nothing but the mail addresses and maybe some
Hashcash tokens. For an adversary, who's allowed to become acquainted
with the identity of the correspondents, that's only little
information - in particular no subject, no indication of attachments.
Of course incoming messages picked up by OmniMix are automatically
retransformed to the original message.
Recipient related Hashcash tokens, which OmniMix since v0.9.9.2 is
able to mint as well, enhance the chances of acceptance by spam
filters with an active Hashcash plug-in.
As already announced, the entropy of the random number generator was
increased by a further XOR layer based on high performance timer
intervals between mouse hook, keyboard hook and timer callback events.
You'll find the new version at
http://www.danner-net.de/om/omnimix099.zip.
As always, any comments and problems reports most appreciated.
Regards
Christian
--
OmniMix .. protect your privacy
http://www.danner-net.de/om.htm
| |
| Noiano 2006-12-17, 1:11 pm |
| Christian Danner wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I just uploaded OmniMix 0.9.9.3.
>
> Most important is the addition of 'Whole Message Encryption', which is
> a convenient method to exchange encrypted mails within a circle of
> friends, either the normal way or through nym accounts:
>
> Other than PGP frontends, which only allow to manipulate your message
> before being sent by the mail client, a proxy server like OmniMix is
> able to alter it as a whole, as long as the result still satisfies the
> mail standards. Provided that the PGP keys of all recipients ('To:'
> and 'Cc:') of a mail are available, OmniMix can be advised to encrypt
> the entire message, including the complete header section, into one
> single PGP message block and send it by means of a rudimentary header,
> which has to contain nothing but the mail addresses and maybe some
> Hashcash tokens. For an adversary, who's allowed to become acquainted
> with the identity of the correspondents, that's only little
> information - in particular no subject, no indication of attachments.
> Of course incoming messages picked up by OmniMix are automatically
> retransformed to the original message.
>
> Recipient related Hashcash tokens, which OmniMix since v0.9.9.2 is
> able to mint as well, enhance the chances of acceptance by spam
> filters with an active Hashcash plug-in.
>
> As already announced, the entropy of the random number generator was
> increased by a further XOR layer based on high performance timer
> intervals between mouse hook, keyboard hook and timer callback events.
>
> You'll find the new version at
> http://www.danner-net.de/om/omnimix099.zip.
>
> As always, any comments and problems reports most appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Christian
why don't you make an installer? I find it hard to make it work!
| |
| macarro 2006-12-19, 7:13 am |
| > As already announced, the entropy of the random number generator was
> increased by a further XOR layer based on high performance timer
> intervals between mouse hook, keyboard hook and timer callback events.
>
> You'll find the new version at
> http://www.danner-net.de/om/omnimix099.zip.
>
> As always, any comments and problems reports most appreciated.
>
> Regards
>
> Christian
Thank you, your work in favour of free speech and anonymity much
appreciated.
| |
| Voice of The Bison 2006-12-22, 1:16 am |
| In article <em3jhv$6tv$1@bananasplit.info>
Noiano <noiano@fake.invalid> wrote:
>
> Christian Danner wrote:
> why don't you make an installer? I find it hard to make it work!
Lucky you! If you made it work at all, you're damned lucky.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-12-22, 1:12 pm |
| >> why don't you make an installer? I find it hard to make it work!
>
>Lucky you! If you made it work at all, you're damned lucky.
What's your specific problem, sir?
Nebulous insinuations won't lead to solutions.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-12-22, 1:12 pm |
| On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Voice of The Bison <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>In article <em3jhv$6tv$1@bananasplit.info>
>Noiano <noiano@fake.invalid> wrote:
>
>Lucky you! If you made it work at all, you're damned lucky.
Or of (at least) average intelligence.
| |
| User Two 2006-12-22, 7:12 pm |
| On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:04:58 -0700 (MST), Borked Pseudo Mailed
<nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Voice of The Bison <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>
>Or of (at least) average intelligence.
>
Is there a Linux port or equivalent that is Linux-n00b compatible?
U2
--
22:31:11 up 15 days, 15:25, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.11, 0.21
Linux 2.6.17-5
| |
| Voice of The Bison 2006-12-23, 7:15 pm |
| In article <ab3e3bd85b1ec5ed138e5a0b372a861c@pseudo.borked.net>
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Voice of The Bison <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>
> Or of (at least) average intelligence.
And at least below average intelligence to help, so that leaves you out,
XXXXXXX.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-12-23, 7:15 pm |
| On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Voice of The Bison <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>In article <ab3e3bd85b1ec5ed138e5a0b372a861c@pseudo.borked.net>
>Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
>And at least below average intelligence to help, so that leaves you out,
>XXXXXXX.
Is that the best you can do? WEAK, bud, very very WEAK.
| |
| Anonymous Remailer (austria) 2006-12-23, 7:15 pm |
|
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Voice of The Bison <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
>In article <ab3e3bd85b1ec5ed138e5a0b372a861c@pseudo.borked.net>
>Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
>And at least below average intelligence to help, so that leaves you out,
>XXXXXXX.
Is that the best you can do? WEAK, bud, very very WEAK.
|
|
|
|
|