|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > December 2006 > A different remailer network
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
A different remailer network
|
|
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-12-20, 1:18 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I post this because I know people rely on the anonimity of the remailer
network for their safety when they post. When their true identity gets
out people may want to go hurt them to get revenge for what they posted.
Maybe not in the western world, but other countries that don't take much
note of human rights might.
Observation:
Twistycreek remailer shut down to bomb threats
Before this Trasher (right?)
Threats about making bomb threats to take Banana down.
Of these three only Banana is still standing, yet no word from Zax for
almost two weeks.
Twisty is completely down. Mail to admin address bounces.
Zax doesn't reply to e-mail to his admin address.
There is ONE XXXXing post on his blog from a few days ago. How much does
that proof?
If Trasher and Twistycreek were brought down by TLA (which I suspect).
Why is Banana still in operation?
What if the TLA can alter the stats on Zax website and thus influence
the chain chosen?
My advise is to not use Banana stats till we have signed proof of Zax
wellbeing and the safe operation on the remailer.
There is no need to remove or block Banana from stats or keyrings as
replyblock using it will still need to function.
I am just saying that is might not be the stronghold remailer it once
was to the community. So use an extra hop for safety when you use Banana.
Take care,
Thomas
- --
"As much as I enjoy this geeky little hobby, the Eelbash remailer
and its attendant services will close shortly" Eelbash Admin - 171206
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRYie2gEP2l8iXKAJAQG1jAMggGZxMIjP
7trcDdfJpFWyqXmKR4k4ZGrN
tG6b2LFJ3+5TgjIgoKZplCTs5z7zJUdsmSYxR6rL
1QVYGjqtxW65XKd3QYQezt1e
jhKzpwkw3FuCvbc8cRI7a6n3Vn5Jsu/ccElSPw==
=0cFO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous Remailer (austria) 2006-12-20, 1:18 am |
|
In article <45889f3d$0$8131$847b8a76@dreader15>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> What if the TLA can alter the stats on Zax website and thus influence
> the chain chosen?
>
You're amazingly stupid and clueless.
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:24:26 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote in
Message-Id: <45889f3d$0$8131$847b8a76@dreader15>:
> My advise is to not use Banana stats till we have signed proof of Zax
Hi Thomas,
Sorry I haven't replied to your emails, every spare moment is Christmas
shopping and I've begun a new project at work that has meant lots of
time working away. I've been following apa-s but there hasn't been
anything worth responding to.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRYkYRGoLu9HNUqmMAQpDugf+JyKxzmlh
PHCTjjVHiDIXlY9Y0TvbXyhI
NkKv0plR3nq4yIDTIaQRbPlHjpVpu+U62qwTy56i
mp8jBheMEAkv6DaCauKNTCK/
Zrh8ATUqNE8eQGm22JBgigK2imxzupgYDccib1zK
Jc3Ad1Ha7jgmlMfoSo+mbSmw
MMmaz9dSE7g9d18hBMLXHS1po+iXg+svnABiBlkK
1g5VZgOA5eBnITR0uPAFmfwH
Ja6KUABoZS9XuvdMdsUPPyTk+NXe104wgSbbPg0E
VUbZwAETzfl1TQF4E0OQ2S9p
9gqmfZo9z12tTgI/ 0+rhsa0d180WKWo2SITjFeDvrZHb+9guCY0Thw==
=DYcG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-12-20, 7:13 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> In article <45889f3d$0$8131$847b8a76@dreader15>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>
> You're amazingly stupid and clueless.
Maybe I need to spell it out for you.
Banana is owned by british TLA.
Maybe you need some more explanation to understand this.
Eelbash is RAAA and actually tells which remailers it is about to take
down with bomb threats (just read the group). After Twisty the
anti-terror forces get a grasp of this and decide not to take down
Banana or give him a warning like they did with Twisty. But they move
in, lift him off his bed and pressure him to reveal his remailer keys.
Steve resists, but they own everything that is not encrypted or
digitally signed anyways. Like the reproducible blog and the stats page.
Now imagine you retrieve Banana stats and all remailers up by 95% or
more are owned by TLA in the same way or by even having been created by
the TLA specifically in order to know the traffic through some nodes.
Like 50%, remember the sudden growth in the number of remailers shortly
after 9/11?
Am I paranoid or are YOU stupid,
Thomas
P.S. Where is Twisty Admin these days? He used to really like me and now
I don't hear nothing of him after some disturbing mails before he
announced his remailer dead due to 'technical problems'. I knew what
those 'technical problems' were and I bet most remops he communicated
with did so even moreso because they were experiencing them too. Don't
you find it amusing that the two remops that seemed to like me most in
this group and frequently sided with me in the past are both silent now?
Why did you think Eelbash *really* stopped and what is this post about
having been handed a bomb threat back to the sender? Banana is owned and
so would Twistycreek have been had Twisty Admin not wiped the keys being
one of the most paranoid (and legally protected and sufficient funded)
remops this group has ever had and one who truly understood the
importance of how he did his job to his users.
I miss you Twisty Admin but there is nothing I can do but post this and
hope your sacrifice wasn't for nothing.
- --
The evil space goat is eating up all remailers - mark my words
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRYkamwEP2l8iXKAJAQF05AMgmo3YAiZj
Ha6fgwgLTwWqaXpZHcFlY3WV
uETQKOSzyxWh5qgWPueOz+7M44U2sdpCknkvKQ92
qsaTwK3n48rm3UOZepxTaP/I
c4I/i87L/UB5MQ3i8huzL5MmYoUvcRif9E0gng==
=yLGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-12-20, 7:13 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Zax wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:24:26 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote in
> Message-Id: <45889f3d$0$8131$847b8a76@dreader15>:
>
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Sorry I haven't replied to your emails, every spare moment is Christmas
> shopping and I've begun a new project at work that has meant lots of
> time working away. I've been following apa-s but there hasn't been
> anything worth responding to.
Well, there is now :-)
Thanks for your signed message! I can be less paranoid when santa hits
my chimney this year! (wonder if he will drop any bombs to help Bush
fight terror (why stop terror when you can fight it after all??))
Thomas
- --
It is ironic, that ultimately, it is the politicians that push for the
use for lie detectors
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRYkdZwEP2l8iXKAJAQEbaQMeI13S95by
PCIAJ4Q5VNpjycOu18zPP7Rt
+3XtCmoIOa1PODo3dIyMAUCBaxqbpnciM3xpEcYu
6kX4MEIAVIwOGyjzcU/8yMcP
nb+QzzqnQxA5oMx+03LbccK9iM3HqG+cyWPbAg==
=mHWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
|
| On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:02:28 +0000 (UTC), Zax <admin@bananasplit.info>
wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:24:26 +0100, Thomas J. Boschloo wrote in
>Message-Id: <45889f3d$0$8131$847b8a76@dreader15>:
>
>
>Hi Thomas,
>
>Sorry I haven't replied to your emails, every spare moment is Christmas
>shopping and I've begun a new project at work that has meant lots of
>time working away. I've been following apa-s but there hasn't been
>anything worth responding to.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUBRYkYRGoLu9HNUqmMAQpDugf+JyKxzmlh
PHCTjjVHiDIXlY9Y0TvbXyhI
> NkKv0plR3nq4yIDTIaQRbPlHjpVpu+U62qwTy56i
mp8jBheMEAkv6DaCauKNTCK/
> Zrh8ATUqNE8eQGm22JBgigK2imxzupgYDccib1zK
Jc3Ad1Ha7jgmlMfoSo+mbSmw
> MMmaz9dSE7g9d18hBMLXHS1po+iXg+svnABiBlkK
1g5VZgOA5eBnITR0uPAFmfwH
> Ja6KUABoZS9XuvdMdsUPPyTk+NXe104wgSbbPg0E
VUbZwAETzfl1TQF4E0OQ2S9p
>9gqmfZo9z12tTgI/ 0+rhsa0d180WKWo2SITjFeDvrZHb+9guCY0Thw==
>=DYcG
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BAD SIGNATURE
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:28:01 -0800, akd wrote in
Message-Id: <ssrko2d8e5d0r2r5p1tqinuqlk3kn5nkot@4ax.com>:
> BAD SIGNATURE
Works for me:-
gpg: Signature made Wed 20 Dec 2006 11:02:28 GMT using RSA key ID CD52A98C.
gpg: Good signature from "Bananasplit Operator"
gpg: aka "Admin <admin@bananasplit.info>"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRYp7omoLu9HNUqmMAQq4TggAoIXYal0X
gEGYY72PKQgp6Z3yu83XZYLY
ZZwrdY0/gPecLF4NK3TWEtITRTrMAma1AW/PA1SAS3bF2q/uJPUbvzH3nMMz/HFS
x1cPujny16OOqvF7LajjA140ZeQIa8WaLaMQPvBM
vfHywyO5qQ2KlUAIiQisFe2J
L/oiC3CPeunyhkeQCEWz0qHHXLhNh6amhZk4/xn3XVssE+iEPTJsx7VtuI+6YyQO
B7t+rBP0ZuQsSbhR42kJh/ 17Vz8HtJwN9D9TxAKWtcOSeNGl9VwkP9dqGIMFZM
uf
5O9EaS8sOBV7ZwUaMtkunoyzUxpcV1xATZfMPkcr
/pzTo0H4RvsetQ==
=6Ro5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-12-21, 1:12 pm |
| akd <akd@somewhere.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:02:28 +0000 (UTC), Zax <admin@bananasplit.info>
> wrote:
>
> BAD SIGNATURE
Must be your own stupid.
gpg: Signature made Wed Dec 20 12:02:28 2006 CET using RSA key ID CD52A98C
gpg: Good signature from "Bananasplit Operator"
gpg: aka "Admin <admin@bananasplit.info>"
| |
| Anonyma 2006-12-21, 1:12 pm |
| akd wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 11:02:28 +0000 (UTC), Zax <admin@bananasplit.info>
> wrote:
[...]
> BAD SIGNATURE
Welcome to Forte Inc's version of "proper message formatting". The post
had (2) lines of more than 72 characters counting the newline, and
Agent believes this is just too much information for a single line of
text so it fixes them. Knode on *nix/*BSD machines does the same thing,
even though it's been awarded some silly "good netkeeping" seal of
approval for being standards compliant or whatever. If you check a
virgin copy of the message it will verify fine. Unfortunately Agent
stores messages in some proprietary format so you probably won't find
one anywhere handy. 
If you do a lot of PGP stuff on the Usenet you might want to consider
another reader. Oddly enough, even Google news knows how to properly
retain message wrapping....
|
|
|
|
|