| Author |
Are any nym servers up anymore?
|
|
| George Orwell 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
works. What is going on anymore?
| |
| Anonymous 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
<nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
>works. What is going on anymore?
Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
|
On 15 Feb 2006 23:53:33 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
><nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
>Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
>Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
>he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)
>
I sent a message through nym.alias.net on 2/16/2006 at 01:59:57 UTC
with no problem.
| |
| Relic Hunter 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In alt.privacy.anon-server, Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1] wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
><nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
>Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
>Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
>he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)
Hmmmmm, not a bad idea.
Regards,
Relic Hunter
PGP Public Key available from key servers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBQ/ PqICgzHA75uZLXEQLhKQCfVLggjJD3bnCOYjwE3d
KdkbPQnlsAn2ri
cePVt0q94gss9Z6GYppRx1NK
=fVlp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| moose 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| >Hmmmmm, not a bad idea.
This caught my eye too... minimal bandwidth requirements right? Anybody
willing to save us some hunting and provide RH and I a shortlist of
Windows (and Linux) packages that might be worth checking out?
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:17:44 GMT in NWSE1J4238764.5123032407@reece.net.au
moose <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> This caught my eye too... minimal bandwidth requirements right? Anybody
> willing to save us some hunting and provide RH and I a shortlist of
> Windows (and Linux) packages that might be worth checking out?
>
Nymservers are only linux, AFAIK: I think they have to be linked to a working
remailer, but if you are concerned about bandwidth problems, the remailer can
be private (like komite?). Panta runs linux for the nymserver, but runs
windows-within-linux for Reliable - if I understand his previous postings?? I
hope he pops up with some help....
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:17:44 GMT in NWSE1J4238764.5123032407@reece.net.au
> moose <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
>
> Nymservers are only linux, AFAIK: I think they have to be linked to a working
> remailer, but if you are concerned about bandwidth problems, the remailer can
> be private (like komite?). Panta runs linux for the nymserver, but runs
> windows-within-linux for Reliable - if I understand his previous postings?? I
> hope he pops up with some help....
Why would he do that? Why not just run mixmaster on linux?
| |
| E.Nigma 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In article < b46a4633afbc65e35b0d3a7468db34da@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
|
| Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
| works. What is going on anymore?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
NAN still works rather well.
E.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3
iQEVAwUBQ/UQBtAqdZr/ mrO9AQFurwf9FoBqsmltFp28J9zGrdE6MCGXYYXZ
m6Ns
b/xsKxwPETNUbrUNioP9YzwFVjp82CTCzL/xpWkuqHaM5nRx5SIjs1lPOljYgahN
F2lYYzz+Scoro00cgeUsGvAm4WCN7gbdLNpYFKMK
PDfg/0s7w6a8j8mC3F+WsBUr
LuW1Bz4jtGY/ fAzPu8zPIbbDa2RGTBViYPe6OXrjXgupyTqTtVbD
gn5NxQFi/Ari
G2484n70HVKkJ5W7l7Ze7MnXyJJCim84DpQVrfQX
oSqH++Wnp9JmFm48g1AeWP1T
8EN1SShOUyJGPgd8mtjzLkCERmFSQVlCFUZNIbKN
USZ6vmGyN84YxA==
=Xj/6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In <DU4BMMFY38765.4278356481@reece.net.au>, NoReply@vnn.vn wrote:
>In article < b46a4633afbc65e35b0d3a7468db34da@mixmast
er.it>
>George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>|
>| Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
>| works. What is going on anymore?
>
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0xFF9AB3BD E. Nigma <NoReply@vnn.vn>
>Date: Thu Feb 16 17:51:34 2006
>Status: OK (Invalid)
>
>NAN still works rather well.
>
>E.
>=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
only if you are willing to use pgp 2.6.x to use it, i am not.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| On 17 Feb 2006 03:47:52 -0000, BiKiKii Admin
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, George Orwell wrote:
>
>Pseudonym Remailer Reliability Statistics
>(reply-block test for each nymserver)
>
> Subject: [STATS] Pseudonym Remailers (BiKiKii)
> From: BiKiKii-Stats
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
>
> <http://xthost.info/bikikii/stats/nymstat.txt>
> <http://bikikii-remailer.noneto.com/stats/nymstat.txt>
>
>Report generated daily at ~10:48 GMT
>
And that's great: but the problem with the unattended nymservers is with
creating new nyms or modifying old ones. Hod has a poor record here, and
komite has recently been troublesome; and NAN is no good for anyone using
modern PGP or GnuPG. We need more nymservers :-(
| |
| E.Nigma 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In article <VXI65BZ538765.7872685185@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
|
| In <DU4BMMFY38765.4278356481@reece.net.au>, NoReply@vnn.vn wrote:
| >In article < b46a4633afbc65e35b0d3a7468db34da@mixmast
er.it>
| >George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
| >|
| >| Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
| >| works. What is going on anymore?
| >
| >=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
| >Signature: 0xFF9AB3BD E. Nigma <NoReply@vnn.vn>
| >Date: Thu Feb 16 17:51:34 2006
| >Status: OK (Invalid)
| >
| >NAN still works rather well.
| >
| >E.
| >=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
|
| only if you are willing to use pgp 2.6.x to use it, i am not.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I use version 6.5.3 and have never had problems with any nym.
E.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3
iQEVAwUBQ/X1nNAqdZr/ mrO9AQH3ewf+Pug9bnZSnQzUwqX38MXQE7cYDRUY
/zGF
cTXYEvcFd+nBNGKPq6LiUm/ l9i+olVNkdiRAoN56RmU1YLiS6EemAWsXF7m6p1r
/
uqEEaANE13VprRkwU5NrB1Q4Ibu9LWTH3Oivim+w
4Ovn89uClURRXhMUuRU1EoUe
eHgVTw+ZEO2mhNfXvNMrZCZsvpBQI+d+tC5XpTbw
dCPIfZwulW86Q6Ys6gO+EEED
Lzxn+KJpVOzkhJ1YyDy9iXct1H5znNfnZtA4zZj2
rMIk2vUWB6zohI/9Dpa1gfxd
13LQZonMqbxT4TUfiza05OyDhe1en1w1RT8zz28s
G2yogH1O/PHWMw==
=wkQX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|