|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > February 2006 > ATTN: PGP *NOT* usable for remailers!!
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
ATTN: PGP *NOT* usable for remailers!!
|
|
| Bearer of Bad News 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT allow for use with remailers because that does not qualify as "personal use".
In <StZIf.6309$Zl1.2252@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, news1@DELETE_THISmccune.cc wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote in
>news:H8VX1WPO38764.5164467593@reece.net.au:
>
>
>Since the ckt builds are unauthorized builds, the NAI (previous owner of
>PGP)
>license that covers use of their Freeware does not apply. It is ownly
>their Freeware that their license applies to.
///////////////////BEGIN EMPHASIS////////////////////////////////
>
>I'm not a lawyer either, but even with official Freeware, I don't think the
>license would permit this.
///////////////////END EMPHASIS/////////////////////////////////
NOW perhaps, People who don't want to be in license violation any more than they absolutely have to be will finally be willing to invent ways to use GnuPG with Reliable, JBN and Quicksiver.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
|
"Bearer of Bad News" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in
message news:VCJWU4HL38765.0530671296@anonymous.poster...
>I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT allow
>for use with remailers because that does not qualify as "personal use".
Blow me.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In article <VCJWU4HL38765.0530671296@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Bearer of Bad News) wrote:
>
> I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT allow for use with remailers because that does not qualify as "personal use".
>
>
> In <StZIf.6309$Zl1.2252@twister.nyroc.rr.com>, news1@DELETE_THISmccune.cc wrote:
>
> ///////////////////BEGIN EMPHASIS////////////////////////////////
>
>
> ///////////////////END EMPHASIS/////////////////////////////////
>
>
> NOW perhaps, People who don't want to be in license violation any more than
> they absolutely have to be will finally be willing to invent ways to use
> GnuPG with Reliable, JBN and Quicksiver.
Looks to me like question asks if a _remailer_ can use PGP freeware--
not remailer users.
| |
| twistycreek 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| >I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT
>allow for use with remailers because that does not qualify as
>"personal use".
LMMP (ie Lawyers Make Me Puke) but here's some legal info on using pgp 2.6
( http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/pgp-commercial.html )
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| On 17 Feb 2006, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Bearer of Bad News)
wrote:
>I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT allow
>for use with remailers because that does not qualify as "personal use".
>
>///////////////////BEGIN EMPHASIS////////////////////////////////
>
>
>///////////////////END EMPHASIS/////////////////////////////////
>
>
>NOW perhaps, People who don't want to be in license violation any more
>than they absolutely have to be will finally be willing to invent ways to
>use GnuPG with Reliable, JBN and Quicksiver.
XXXX off, zealot.
It's people like YOU who keep people like me from even looking at GnuPG as
an option, because we don't want to be associated with GnuPG proselyte
nutcases. Like YOU.
| |
| The Plague 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In < 38af162b37abc39b705bec6a36b30c0e@remaile
r.metacolo.com>, anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com wrote:
>"Bearer of Bad News" <Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote in
>message news:VCJWU4HL38765.0530671296@anonymous.poster...
>
>Blow me.
"Thank You"
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In <2b1d44b51ab5a2ad2b54bc205e362962@dizum.com>, nobody@dizum.com wrote:
>In article <VCJWU4HL38765.0530671296@anonymous.poster>
>Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Bearer of Bad News) wrote:
>
>Looks to me like question asks if a _remailer_ can use PGP freeware--
>not remailer users.
yeah, but if you're gonna convert, why stop with the server? why not fix up the client as well? these things offer choice of version don't they? give us another choice.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| In <dcc1f293c8d92c45340cf2b0b8ec3412@pseudo.borked.net>, nobody@pseudo.borked.net wrote:
>On 17 Feb 2006, Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header (Bearer of Bad News)
>wrote:
>
>XXXX off, zealot.
>
>It's people like YOU who keep people like me from even looking at GnuPG as
>an option, because we don't want to be associated with GnuPG proselyte
>nutcases. Like YOU.
hmpth.. i'm not a zelot, nor do i play one on t.v.
i just want the option of using my preferred version.. you're free to use what you want, i want that same freedom.
in order to have that freedom somebody has to be willing to make the changes to make it available.
i don't care if support for 2.6.x and 6.5.8 is left in, i just want the option to not be forced to use them.
| |
| marcoc 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| [vbcol=seagreen]
A way can be to compile a windows version of pgpgpg debian package.
A long testing phase will be necessary, but the porting task seems
trivial .....
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-17, 11:08 pm |
| > I just saw this in alt.security.pgp, PGP's freeware license does NOT allow for use with remailers because that does not qualify as "personal use".
Mixmaster does not use PGP. It uses its own OpenPGP implementation.
PGP's license does not matter.
|
|
|
|
|