Anonymous Servers - Available Anonymous Accounts?

Author

Available Anonymous Accounts?

jay.ktori@yahoo.com

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

Does anyone have any anoymous newsgroup accounts that anyone can use to
post to usenet from?

Anonyma

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

jay.ktori@yahoo.com wrote in
news:1140744510.645595.148520@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

> Does anyone have any anoymous newsgroup accounts that anyone can use to
> post to usenet from?
>
>
No, use a remailer client like the rest of us.

Nomen Nescio

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

On 23 Feb 2006, jay.ktori@yahoo.com wrote:
>Does anyone have any anoymous newsgroup accounts that anyone can use to
>post to usenet from?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Er, No. Anyone does not have any anonymous newsgroup
accounts that anyone can use to post to usenet from.

Does that answer your question, or would you care to
rephrase your question a bit, you know, after you've
put down the crack pipe and sobered up a bit? :-D

Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ/5lTZljD7YrHM/ nEQLSygCgqNwxs1UjMT7WOVB769Shd0cbPgsAoPI
L
JmlAgrTV5WycHO2b7HJpPqCU
=WA8G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

traveler 66

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

On 23 Feb 2006 17:28:30 -0800, jay.ktori@yahoo.com wrote:

> Path: news.privacy.li!dartmaster!s02-b07.iad01!63.218.45.10.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: jay.ktori@yahoo.com
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.anonymous,alt.privacy.anon-server
> Subject: Available Anonymous Accounts?
> Date: 23 Feb 2006 17:28:30 -0800
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Lines: 3
> Message-ID: <1140744510.645595.148520@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.106.245.5
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1140744516 25632 127.0.0.1 (24 Feb 2006 01:28:36 GMT)
> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 01:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
> User-Agent: G2/0.2
> X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> Injection-Info: z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.106.245.5; posting-account=OcwKRg0AAAAPzSczPYnArN--TSYaW9mT
> Xref: news.privacy.li alt.privacy:103600 alt.anonymous:39567 alt.privacy.anon-server:314246
>
> Does anyone have any anoymous newsgroup accounts that anyone can use to
> post to usenet from?

You can also post through google or any other free service, just use a good
proxy when you connect and sign up with them, that way they won't have your
real I.P.

Reagards,

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

In article <1b10de93cb12d54b97b3836ba3fea32b@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> On 23 Feb 2006, jay.ktori@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Er, No. Anyone does not have any anonymous newsgroup
> accounts that anyone can use to post to usenet from.
>
> Does that answer your question, or would you care to
> rephrase your question a bit, you know, after you've
> put down the crack pipe and sobered up a bit? :-D
>
> Enjoy!
> Daniel Joseph Min
>

The Collected Buffoonery of Daniel Joseph Min - Usenet's most failed prophet.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who is Danny Min?
What does he post?
Examples of failed prophecies
What you should do

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Who is Daniel J. Min?
Daniel J. Min is a denizen of Usenet newsgroups. He posts using various variations on his name, including using asterisks or underlines in place of letters. Often he will post as "Nomen Nescio" or Anonymous, and he used to post as GOD>.
The reason for this is to get around peoples "kill files" or "bozo filters"

However, he consistently posts through anonymous "remailers" in order to disguise his true identity

He posts to various newsgroups, including alt.astrology, alt.astronomy, and alt.prophecies.nostradamus. He posts in any inappropriate newsgroup he deems neccessary.

Additionally Danny has been known to directly email people, once again, using his anonymous remailer service.

What does he post?
Danny posts various garbage claims about astrological influences, and birthdata, which he generally makes up as he goes along. Outstanding amongst his posts include claims to know exactly the birthdata of Jesus Christ, Johannes Kepler, Ptolemy, and variou
s other historical characters.
He posts silly prophecies and claims, and even at times posts his own "kill file list" which has become so large that it's unlikely he even *sees* anyone else s posts anymore.

Some Classic examples of Danny's failed prophecies
(Danny's "prophetic" words are italicized)
Danny predicts the "Great Khan of Terror":
On 15 Nov 1999 22:34:03 -0600, GOD wrote in these newsgroups:
The king of terror will come some time around the month of May in 2000.

At this time, the inner planets will all be lined up on one side of the sun with the exception of the Earth which will be directly at the opposite side.

The increased gravitational effects of the sun combined with the added pull from the other planets will have a devastating effect on the earth.

At this time, all major fault lines will rupture. California will experience the big one at this time.

Volcanic activity will increase and it is very likely that the Long Valley Caulderra will explode cataclysmicly. These types of events will be occurring at roughly the same time throughout the entire planet.

To top it off, the suns corona will be nudged away from the earth...towards the grouped inner planets, effectively creating a massive coronal hole (I.E." the "three days of darkness").

When the pull of the alignment comes to pass, the corona will snap back to the earth facing side thereby releasing a CME of massive proportions....aimed directly at planet Earth.

Believe me, there will be terror at this time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Danny moves "The Great Kahn of Terror" by yet another 7 months:
On Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:59:25 -0500, No User wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Jun 2000, bobo@vornet.com (BobO fficer) wrote:

[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]

Yes, the seventh month 1999 in the revised Roman calendar was from sunset September 10th to sunset October 10th but the first month 1999 was in the spring of 1762 BC, sunset Saturday March 24th to sunset April 22nd proleptic Julian. The seventh month Etha
nim was therefore 2000, not of 1999 but FROM the first month in the YEAR 1999 of the passover. Hence, the YEAR 1999 seventh month AND seven months. See?[vbcol=seagreen]

[vbcol=seagreen]
>The LORD granted the centuries and you did not repent. He giveth and He taketh away. You Robert, speak blasphemy of the LORD.

[vbcol=seagreen]
>I am corrected by scripture--and Nostradamus was likewise.

[vbcol=seagreen]
>And yet again must that universal ruler of infernal hades be raised up as it is written. Beware the star in fortune opposing, in the rule of night from heaven it advances to WINNOW, "Whose fan is in his hand, and he will thoroughly purge his floor, and g
ather his wheat into the garner but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire" [Mat 3:12]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daniel Expects half the world's population destroyed in October 2000
On Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:00:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>On Sun, 2 Jul 2000, "Douglas Deaton" wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]

That makes two of us, or 6 billion of us if I'm not entirely mistaken.
At October much will be made clear
by ways and means of the elements.
I expect half the population gone,
global equalisation of temperature
and pressure, the time, a new race,
His perpetual age the moment where,
or at the place when, smoke clears.

Enjoy the fireworks!
Daniel Joseph Min- >

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daniel predicts the US presidential election for 2000
On 12 Nov 2000 23:44:00 -0000, Daniel Joseph Min wrote:
The 42nd President of the United States is the very
last of all the American Presidents to hold office.

He will announce our *National Emergency* shortly,
thus will continue in the office of the President,
having already been inaugurated in due diligence
when he was elected President. Gore is still VP.

&There is no reason to repeal the 22nd amendment,
given that Mr. President William Jefferson Clinton
has been elected twice only, and no more, thus the
amendment does not apply. Neither does a term limit
apply in his case, given that this is indeed a true
state of emergency with bloody violence seen to be
escalating in the State of Florida and elsewhere,
spreading like wildfire as it is in the mid east.

Get to higher ground if you can (look at England!)
Daniel Joseph Min

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what should you do about him?

Well, first of all, you can be pretty sure based on his success rate that anything he has to say is wrong.
Someone once said, rather well, that "there is too much Min, and not enough Nostradamus" in what he posts.

Complaining won't do much, because he's they type of individual that doesn't feel the need to explain himself.
Asking him to stop only feeds him.
complaining to his anonymous remailer service results in nothing.
About the best thing to be said, is just be aware of what a buffoon he is.

Nomen Nescio

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, traveler 66 <noreply@nym.alias.net> wrote:
>On 23 Feb 2006 17:28:30 -0800, jay.ktori@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>You can also post through google or any other free service, just use a good
>proxy when you connect and sign up with them, that way they won't have your
>real I.P.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Yes, that's correct. The words anonymous and pseudonymous can
be used interchangeably at will. After all, they mean exactly
the same thing. Everybody knows that, which is why nobody in
their right mind ever bothers to use the anonymous remailers,
encrypted up-links, or any other encryption methods for that
matter. That's obsolete technology. It's all Google nowadays...

Rest assured, not even the FBI, NSA, CIA, HLS et al government
agencies can possibly crack the top-secret "Google" encryption.
That's why you've never heard about it. Because it's so secret
that not even world-class encryption and security experts have
ever even heard about it. No agency in the world can traceroute
IPs connecting to the top-secret "Google" network. Yup. That's
the ticket... :-D

Enjoy!
Daniel Joseph Min
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup...arch=0x2B1CCFE7

*Download Min's Banned (Freeware) Books:
http://www.2hot2cool.com/11/danieljosephmin/

*Min's Google-Archived Home Page On The WWW:
http://groups.google.com/groups?sel...nonymous.poster

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQ/8jb5ljD7YrHM/nEQKPxgCggPy5jfmsfIztogvU24M+Rmrrh/IAn0EK
eLA+DswqidC970zccyhYFsS8
=FXYG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

George Orwell

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

traveler 66 wrote:

>
> You can also post through google or any other free service, just use a
> good proxy when you connect and sign up with them, that way they won't
> have your real I.P.

1. Only a moron quotes entire message headers in a reply.

2. The poster asked for something **ANONYMOUS**. Your "use a proxy and
Google" advice only spotlights your incompetence, once again.

3. Everyone should be wondering to themselves what motivates someone to
suggest non-anonymous solutions to questions about being anonymous.
Repeatedly and continually. What potential benefit could there be in
deceiving people this way?

Only two things motivate people like you... money and power. You're either
trying to fatten your wallet by fooling peopl.e into believing your snake
oil services are actually anonymous, or fatten your NSA style profiles of
people who would believe they're anonymous, but aren't. Or both.

Everything you've ever said and done here in these groups has been
designed as a step in one of those two directions. You're either the most
dedicated shill on the planed or the dumbest one.

Non scrivetemi

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

TwistyCreek

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

>You're either the most
>dedicated shill on the planed or the dumbest one.

I think all indicators are pointing dumbest... Like why would he be using
a consistant nym in groups where he would fit in just fine as A Melon. I
tend to think he doesn't realize he's an idiot and thinks he's building a
respected identity.

Jury is still out though

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

TwistyCreek wrote:

>
> I think all indicators are pointing dumbest... Like why would he be using
> a consistant nym in groups where he would fit in just fine as A Melon. I

The "traveler" Nym is a failed attempt to help offset the obvious other
nyms the idiot uses, which he believes also makes it look like the
anonymous posters aren't more sock puppets. The most pathetic thing about
all of this spunkmonkey's nym hopping is the rock solid horrible spelling
and grammar that make him look even more ridiculous the more he tries to
make himself look credible.

I'm going with dumbest too. I mean how low does your IQ have to be to
finally try and correct some of your spelling mistakes only to make a
complete village idiot out of yourself by making even more laughably
telling mistakes using most of your nyms. Within 24 hours no less. That
was a classic, even among the astounding idiocy we've seen here in AP/APAS
over the last few years.

> tend to think he doesn't realize he's an idiot and thinks he's building a
> respected identity.
>
> Jury is still out though

Two for dumbest, none for dedicated.

traveler 66

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

"George Orwell" <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:e447df37adb38e67e83d8bfe6f0dbf2d@mi
xmaster.it...
> traveler 66 wrote:
>
>
> 1. Only a moron quotes entire message headers in a reply.

Your a high standard troll.
>
> 2. The poster asked for something **ANONYMOUS**. Your "use a proxy and
> Google" advice only spotlights your incompetence, once again.

Anonymity can be created depending on what level of it you desire, don't cha
think? You can use anything from proxy's to TOR. Free.
>
> 3. Everyone should be wondering to themselves what motivates someone to
> suggest non-anonymous solutions to questions about being anonymous.
> Repeatedly and continually. What potential benefit could there be in
> deceiving people this way?

Your trolls demand the same question.
>
> Only two things motivate people like you... money and power. You're either
> trying to fatten your wallet by fooling peopl.e into believing your snake
> oil services are actually anonymous, or fatten your NSA style profiles of
> people who would believe they're anonymous, but aren't. Or both.

It's more likely that you are the owner of a "snake oil service" and troll
others that don't peddle your name in every sentence! Good quality, chained
free proxy's can be used to set up what I described without having to use
any service. It depends on what level of anonymity a person wants.
>
> Everything you've ever said and done here in these groups has been
> designed as a step in one of those two directions. You're either the most
> dedicated shill on the planed or the dumbest one.

Speak for yourself, you seem to have run out of puppets lately? Stick with
the re-mailers.

traveler 66

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:daa49ae5e0c78aa72323a97504bd41b7@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> TwistyCreek wrote:
>
using[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> The "traveler" Nym is a failed attempt to help offset the obvious other
> nyms the idiot uses, which he believes also makes it look like the
> anonymous posters aren't more sock puppets. The most pathetic thing about
> all of this spunkmonkey's nym hopping is the rock solid horrible spelling
> and grammar that make him look even more ridiculous the more he tries to
> make himself look credible.
>
> I'm going with dumbest too. I mean how low does your IQ have to be to
> finally try and correct some of your spelling mistakes only to make a
> complete village idiot out of yourself by making even more laughably
> telling mistakes using most of your nyms. Within 24 hours no less. That
> was a classic, even among the astounding idiocy we've seen here in AP/APAS
> over the last few years.
>
a[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Two for dumbest, none for dedicated.

Stop talking to yourself.

blackhat

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

What was described can be done through TOR with high anonymity, and
will stay that way as long as it's accessed through something like TOR,
easy unless your a troll. Use an anonymous privacy company if
connectivity and uptime are an issue for a heavy user.

George Orwell

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

XXXX off back to alt.cotse XXXXXXX

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

traveler 66 wrote:

>
> Your a high standard troll.

And YOU'RE an illiterate fukwit who outed himself in one of the most
laughable bouts of self-spank we've had the pleasure of watching in this
group for quite some time now.

I see you gave up on your little spelling correction project. Leave a bad
taste in your mouth did it?

<LAUGH!>

>
> Anonymity can be created depending on what level of it you desire, don't
> cha think?

No I don't. And neither does any other intelligent being or anyone who
knows anything at all about anonymity. Anonymous has a very clear
definition, and it DOESN'T include a clear and definable path back to the
origin of a message.

Single points of contact like typical "anonymous proxies" and "anonymity
services" are not anonymous. Period. No matter how badly you'd like to
redefine the concept to prop up your marketing plan, it's just not so.
They suffice as privacy tools if and ONLY if you can trust their
operators, but beyond that they're useless and anyone who claims
otherwise is either a lying puppet or a poor misinformed soul that made
the mistake of listening to someone like you.

> It's more likely that you are the owner of a "snake oil service" and troll

Pot, kettle, black.

You're pathetic.

traveler 66

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:56d2bbda03dd074d30f7aefde7efa902@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> traveler 66 wrote:
>
>
> And YOU'RE an illiterate fukwit who outed himself in one of the most
> laughable bouts of self-spank we've had the pleasure of watching in this
> group for quite some time now.

OK,

>
> I see you gave up on your little spelling correction project. Leave a bad
> taste in your mouth did it?

Lol, look below, you're getting to be worth a good laugh!

>
> <LAUGH!>
>
>
> No I don't. And neither does any other intelligent being or anyone who
> knows anything at all about anonymity. Anonymous has a very clear
> definition, and it DOESN'T include a clear and definable path back to the
> origin of a message.

Creating FUD and presenting it as fact again, like the other poster said: go
back to alt.cotse.
>
> Single points of contact like typical "anonymous proxies" and "anonymity

It's "proxy's" you twit, LOL!! The spelling mistakes are all yours, do you
like reflecting yourself off on others?
Have fun puppet/troll !!!!!! LOL, LOL, !

> services" are not anonymous. Period. No matter how badly you'd like to
> redefine the concept to prop up your marketing plan, it's just not so.

I know, you're right as always. I'm going to use cotse from now on, lol

> They suffice as privacy tools if and ONLY if you can trust their
> operators,

Not only just that, but you know this.

>but beyond that they're useless and anyone who claims
> otherwise is either a lying puppet or a poor misinformed soul that made
> the mistake of listening to someone like you.
>
>
> Pot, kettle, black.

Mr Gielda I presume, what a joke!

>
> You're pathetic.

And your not, lol

Flush Off Troll

traveler 66

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:56d2bbda03dd074d30f7aefde7efa902@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> traveler 66 wrote:
>
>
> And YOU'RE an illiterate fukwit who outed himself in one of the most
> laughable bouts of self-spank we've had the pleasure of watching in this
> group for quite some time now.
>
> I see you gave up on your little spelling correction project. Leave a bad
> taste in your mouth did it?
>
> <LAUGH!>
>
>
> No I don't. And neither does any other intelligent being or anyone who
> knows anything at all about anonymity. Anonymous has a very clear
> definition, and it DOESN'T include a clear and definable path back to the
> origin of a message.
>
> Single points of contact like typical "anonymous proxies" and "anonymity
> services" are not anonymous. Period. No matter how badly you'd like to
> redefine the concept to prop up your marketing plan, it's just not so.
> They suffice as privacy tools if and ONLY if you can trust their
> operators, but beyond that they're useless and anyone who claims
> otherwise is either a lying puppet or a poor misinformed soul that made
> the mistake of listening to someone like you.
>
>
> Pot, kettle, black.
>
> You're pathetic.

I forgot to ask you, did your social assistance cheque come in alright this
week?
Get a job, you've to much time on your hands, and we all have to pay for it!

George Orwell

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

traveler 66 wrote:

>
> Lol, look below, you're getting to be worth a good laugh!

[...]

>
> It's "proxy's" you twit, LOL!! The spelling mistakes are all yours, do
> you like reflecting yourself off on others? Have fun puppet/troll !!!!!!
> LOL, LOL, !

Uh, dimbulb... proxies is the plural of proxy. Proxy's is the possessive.
The poster used the correct one to denote speaking about all or multiple
proxies in the statement above.

Please go find a towel now. Take as much time as you need to get all that
egg off your face. Don't worry, we'll all be waiting to make fun of you
some more when you get back.

<laugh>

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

<laugh>

TwistyCreek

2006-02-26, 5:46 pm

>Yes, that's correct. The words anonymous and pseudonymous can

Look, it's the XXXX up cotse shills playing with their new spam - post
directly to re-mailers from the news reader, what a XXXXing joke
SPAMMERS, that's why your the only ones using it, no one else wants
it, even if it's free, lol

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-27, 2:46 am

traveler 66 wrote:

>
> OK,

You reply twice to the same post and "OK" is the best response you have
against having your hilarious attempts to make it look like someone agrees
with you shoved down your throat AGAIN?

That's pathetic. Really pathetic.

>
> It's "proxy's" you twit, LOL!! The spelling mistakes are all yours, do
> you like reflecting yourself off on others? Have fun puppet/troll !!!!!!
> LOL, LOL, !

Oh, my, GOD you're a drooling retard... "proxies" is the plural of proxy
Einstein, not "proxy's".

Your ability to make yourself look like the consummate village idiot is
unparalleled. Village idiots the world over CURSE you for setting the bar
so high.

ROTFL! This is even funnier than your stupid spelling correction puppet
mistake, ya' flaming day-glow MORON! Absolutely off the idiotometer. Can't
be measured by any known means.

>
> I know, you're right as always. I'm going to use cotse from now on, lol

Please do not. Stick with your own snake oil. You're the best weapon
honest services have. A true "useful idiot" among puppets. Every time your
spittle covered fingers make contact with the keyboard you do something
even more ridiculous than before, and help build a sterling case in favor
of using services with operators who aren't so cowardly they hide behind
pseudonyms and sock puppets, and so dishonest and greedy they have to lie
about their capabilities to get customers.

>
>
> Not only just that, but you know this.

ROTFL!

Well, at least you just admitted you're dishonest and untrustworthy and
tried to say you're useful anyway.

> And your not, lol

I think you meant "you're", dumbfuk...

ROTFL! Idiot.

>
> Flush Off Troll

Another "flush", but you replied **TWICE** this time. You're pathetic. We
OWN your pathetic XXX because you can't stand to see someone tell the
truth. You're scared to DEATH of the truth. Can't let a word of it be
posted without whining like a XXXXX.

We absolutely LOVE being able to pull your leash and command you to
speak like this. We've always wanted an AP/APAS pet.

Good doggy! :-)

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-02-27, 2:46 am

TwistyCreek wrote:

> that's why your the only ones

I'm sorry travelerpuppet #66, did you mean "you're"?

ROTFLMAO!

traveler 66

2006-02-27, 2:46 am

You're a blibbering idiot and a legend in your own mind, but I bet you've
heard that before. Still not using your various nicks, what's up? Don't
want to look like a puppet and a troll?

FLUSH

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:a9e9b9b36ed0423f3b1cf593b1620163@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> traveler 66 wrote:
>
this[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> You reply twice to the same post and "OK" is the best response you have
> against having your hilarious attempts to make it look like someone agrees
> with you shoved down your throat AGAIN?
>
> That's pathetic. Really pathetic.
>
"anonymity[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Oh, my, GOD you're a drooling retard... "proxies" is the plural of proxy
> Einstein, not "proxy's".
>
> Your ability to make yourself look like the consummate village idiot is
> unparalleled. Village idiots the world over CURSE you for setting the bar
> so high.
>
> ROTFL! This is even funnier than your stupid spelling correction puppet
> mistake, ya' flaming day-glow MORON! Absolutely off the idiotometer. Can't
> be measured by any known means.
>
>
> Please do not. Stick with your own snake oil. You're the best weapon
> honest services have. A true "useful idiot" among puppets. Every time your
> spittle covered fingers make contact with the keyboard you do something
> even more ridiculous than before, and help build a sterling case in favor
> of using services with operators who aren't so cowardly they hide behind
> pseudonyms and sock puppets, and so dishonest and greedy they have to lie
> about their capabilities to get customers.
>
>
> ROTFL!
>
> Well, at least you just admitted you're dishonest and untrustworthy and
> tried to say you're useful anyway.

>
>
> I think you meant "you're", dumbfuk...
>
> ROTFL! Idiot.
>
>
> Another "flush", but you replied **TWICE** this time. You're pathetic. We
> OWN your pathetic XXX because you can't stand to see someone tell the
> truth. You're scared to DEATH of the truth. Can't let a word of it be
> posted without whining like a XXXXX.
>
> We absolutely LOVE being able to pull your leash and command you to
> speak like this. We've always wanted an AP/APAS pet.
>
> Good doggy! :-)
>
>

George Orwell

2006-02-27, 7:46 am

traveler/bugfart/Adweenie/puppet#66 wrote:

> You're a blibbering

Excuse me.... "blibbering"? Is that another plural of "proxy" or
something?

ROTFLMAOSHIPMP!

My GOD you're a complete assclown. Can't even make a dreary attempt at a
comeback without pissing all down the front of your polyester highwaters.

I mean seriously, I've seen some people totally suck at this sorta shit,
but you swallow and giggle. You could sit perfectly still in the middle of
an empty room and with no help from anyone at all make a complete fool of
yourself. It's like you invested heavily in stupidity and decided to drive
the price up by hoarding all you can.

traveler 66

2006-02-27, 8:45 pm

"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:d16186033b4077803ed2305ac5eb6c48@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> TwistyCreek wrote:
>
>
> I'm sorry travelerpuppet #66, did you mean "you're"?
>
> ROTFLMAO!

lol