Anonymous Servers - Attn Thrasher admin

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > February 2006 > Attn Thrasher admin





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Attn Thrasher admin
Anonymous

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

Hi.
You got a new header, like
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
omtas01sl.mx.bigpond.com from [143.238.190.113] using ID
annieo50@bigpond.net.au at Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:23:18 +0000
Not being critical, I wonder what it all means. It's different.



Thrasher Admin

2006-02-25, 5:51 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <DDG55F6L38773.5236458333@reece.net.au>
"Anonymous" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
> You got a new header, like
> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
> omtas01sl.mx.bigpond.com from [143.238.190.113] using ID
> annieo50@bigpond.net.au at Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:23:18 +0000
> Not being critical, I wonder what it all means. It's different.


You and me both. It's as if the message isn't from me. My IP address is
61.9.247.77 and I'm in Western Australia. The 143.238.190.113 address is a
Queensland address, added to which I have no idea who annieo50@bigpond.net.au
is. Do the rest of the headers look like they usually do?



- --
Cheers,
Thrasher...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBQ/ +dUWe9vBuCUlx7AQGF5QgAgBDqKheLcfITBl+mB6
eTP4dv/HSES/Q6
SQlHTJPOQOKTpkPwrlRf4Q9sMyNcqU0cqOUT6UMT
VvINNJ+70COdxr5upioKsuD7
9e9gQrpiv1lRNCcpb5e/ xxtRDLSKWXMMhFrxWZdZxy4hPasAIQnzp5gSvb7G
WaTe
k0JqQMFbmr610aVpeqEQafWpR3HEku5g1Z7uBrAC
OZ0EP5NWwYvESJPWWgPSJS2Z
gzjMcyDS5ysPRVJw6kzgYtpP0icBufiDoUTIc2KE
UDLpzZDzuLV/OeTA7u7DXesC
taXBjfefcErNpsq2SriIADOhcXCmx2ZllB6YkARL
R0FIUMf8xjnJYw==
=k5uP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Thrasher Remailer

2006-02-26, 11:32 am

In article <RILMHV1438773.6685416667@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Admin <thrasher_admin@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> You and me both. It's as if the message isn't from me. My IP address is
> 61.9.247.77 and I'm in Western Australia. The 143.238.190.113 address is a
> Queensland address, added to which I have no idea who annieo50@bigpond.net.au
> is. Do the rest of the headers look like they usually do?


Don't you have control of your mail server?


Anonymous

2006-02-26, 5:46 pm

"Anonymous" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:

> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
> omtas01sl.mx.bigpond.com from [143.238.190.113] using ID
> annieo50@bigpond.net.au at Sat, 25 Feb 2006 03:23:18 +0000
> Not being critical, I wonder what it all means. It's different.


Are you sure it wasn't some spam mail forging thrasher's headers? I haven't
seen this header from thrasher yet.
Thrasher Admin

2006-02-26, 8:45 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <WYGD62JB38774.3313310185@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> In article <RILMHV1438773.6685416667@reece.net.au>
> Thrasher Admin <thrasher_admin@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> Don't you have control of your mail server?


Yes but that's not where that post came from.


- --
Cheers,
Thrasher...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBRAHYhme9vBuCUlx7AQGTgwf6A9DvRQaD
yvHlmp+OK1UThU/BFR5cVugm
B25HzlNgwQcerq0jC+HTUjF/gBTdIjTdPDm6UFdTDlQF/q535/DQl+xMP8gafT3U
Z9bT/ SDQTV8VRvqekac32+FU9uVSgap0ccjzHlj3dsqiw
//Ezv9CrLPqq0rCQsjS
KO6OMxqff+g84W1x3QjgXwGD2koFEZtw4PEtF/eu6r7MgHqs9kOG9LgvrkGjtYzx
bpiZ8ZXRpNfwk37Z304/ jPE3k2+c8MMD1H8pD9s74vq4pJNimEfBVs5phODt
6aD3
uZ8Miy2zwU/1QQfSxX8p+kVqGLhg8N39JCthyfbW/xM3h37de/UI1A==
=BGyO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Thrasher Admin

2006-02-26, 8:45 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <938c6baa81277ab5986d29d022cc14d1@anon.mixmaster.mixmin.net>
Anonymous <nobody@invalid.org> wrote:
>
> "Anonymous" <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
>
>
> Are you sure it wasn't some spam mail forging thrasher's headers? I haven't
> seen this header from thrasher yet.


That's what I figured but it seems kind of pointless forging a remailer's
headers. It would be a lot easier to just send the mail via the remailer.


- --
Cheers,
Thrasher...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBRAHZ9Ge9vBuCUlx7AQHGuQgAmc7qfdrG
r7lNLJPooW16VzXAAWhTXZfZ
jY0N3oCfbazZTv5GwX9KA7HCZPdxZAEvng5cKLN2
MXsYS/+NngAzk8ko4aYiWV98
i2doLwa9IpPeJW+nv52hpcEZRlFSm9s6Xd68g9lt
2prylIF8Oe7CXIvPMSSCeBl8
LkQeSghq/pPzSAIr0JyjE0Mn4N0COP0adY+UIfyGY1E91tA7/xVT6kHnXO7EBVsI
jdc2oaPnwQsra4KL3Hs5nS5g9Ed4hQrwpqVjzpnT
36SdPRNv07STDItAF8lreaIM
JrUwcmPmeFOVzG5Ae3trbm9YsIBbkoXmY12TUhfC
xt+Yp8MgV/0DGQ==
=Ge8V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com