| Author |
When will mixminion be ready for the big time?
|
|
| [Anon] Diet Coke is for fat people 2006-02-25, 5:51 pm |
| This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to
receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
admin@firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext
07-08-09?
-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
| |
|
| "[Anon] Diet Coke is for fat people" <nobody@firenze.linux.it> wrote in
news:20060225161030.1945D3C2333@mail.firenze.linux.it:
> This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
> Project mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to
> receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
> admin@firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
> https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or
> https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
>
> -----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
> Message-type: plaintext
In your subject line you asked:
When will mixminion be ready for the big time?
Answer: when the headers above no longer appear in every message and when
they realise that plain text does not need to be dash-escaped because it
breaks pgp signatures and encryption.
...Thats when.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-02-26, 11:32 am |
| > 07-08-09?
No, that's the date that Duke Nukem Forever is released.
| |
| WRONG: Diet Coke is for people with NO TASTE 2006-02-26, 11:32 am |
| In <20060225161030.1945D3C2333@mail.firenze.linux.it>, nobody@firenze.linux.it wrote:
>This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
>Project mixminion server at firenze.linux.it. If you do not want to
>receive anonymous messages, please contact antani-
>admin@firenze.linux.it. For more information about anonymity, see
>https://remailer.firenze.linux.it or
>https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
>
>-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
>Message-type: plaintext
>
>07-08-09?
>
>-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
=-10
| |
| [Anon] Anon User 2006-02-26, 11:32 am |
| This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Winston Smith
Project Nefarion mixminion server at nefarion.winstonsmith.info. If
you do not want to receive anonymous messages, please contact pbox-
admin@winstonsmith.info. For more information about anonymity, see
https://www.winstonsmith.info/pws or
https://e-privacy.firenze.linux.it.
-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext
>Answer: when the headers above
>no longer appear in every message
>and when they realise that plain
>text does not need to be dash-escaped
>because it breaks pgp signatures and
>encryption.
So why did they put it there in the
first place? To screw up PGP? To make
posts difficult to read with those headers?
Strange indeed.
-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
| |
| anonymous@remailer.hastio.org 2006-02-26, 11:32 am |
| nobody@firenze.linux.it wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
> Message-type: plaintext
>
> 07-08-09?
>
> -----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
The polymorphing dll has to be written first. As it's written in python, it
is impossible to reuse the one that comes with JBN2. One has to be written
from scratch. Be patient.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
| |
|
| > The polymorphing dll has to be written
> first. As it's written in python, it
> is impossible-
Ho ho ho. The polymorphing dll sketch
makes an appearance yet again. He he he.
Isn't the polymorphing dll sketch just
so outrageously funny!
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-26, 8:45 pm |
| In <20060226102430.44AB1905E@nefarion.homelinux.net>, nobody@nefarion.homelinux.net wrote:
snip headers
>
>So why did they put it there in the
>first place? To screw up PGP? To make
>posts difficult to read with those headers?
>Strange indeed.
I dunno, you might email Nick Mathewson and ask him.
If you do, ask him to stop by apas and fill the rest of us in would you?
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-02-27, 8:45 pm |
| >> The polymorphing dll has to be written
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Ho ho ho. The polymorphing dll sketch
> makes an appearance yet again
We'll need a new wikipedia ammendment then too I guess. (The old one is
devoted to mixmaster only)
It has been catagorized (ie wikified) though. It's under malware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphing_dll
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-02-28, 7:46 am |
| In <FOC3FIRA38776.3762268519@reece.net.au>, thrasher@reece.net.au wrote:
>
>
>We'll need a new wikipedia ammendment then too I guess. (The old one is
>devoted to mixmaster only)
>
>It has been catagorized (ie wikified) though. It's under malware.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymorphing_dll
Yeah, but lets be reasonable at least. It >should< be under FICTIONAL malware.
|
|
|
|