Anonymous Servers - Attn: Twisty admin

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > March 2006 > Attn: Twisty admin





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Attn: Twisty admin
TwistyCreek

2006-03-06, 5:47 pm

Any chance of adding a filter to stop multiple copies when your remailer is
used as an exit remailer?
Thank you.



TwistyCreek

2006-03-06, 5:47 pm

In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> Any chance of adding a filter to stop multiple copies when your remailer is
> used as an exit remailer?
> Thank you.


All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message then
multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different date/time
stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=

This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then everything I
have said is a lie.


TwistyCreek

2006-03-06, 8:45 pm

In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> Any chance of adding a filter to stop multiple copies when your remailer is
> used as an exit remailer?
> Thank you.


All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
then
multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
date/time
stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=

This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
everything I
have said is a lie.



anonymous@remailer.hastio.org

2006-03-06, 8:45 pm

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:19:14 +0000, TwistyCreek wrote:

> In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com> TwistyCreek
> <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
> then multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
> date/time stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=
>
> This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
> everything I have said is a lie.


You mean 'an error' don't you?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.





TwistyCreek

2006-03-06, 8:45 pm

In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> Any chance of adding a filter to stop multiple copies when your remailer is
> used as an exit remailer?
> Thank you.


All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
then
multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
date/time
stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=

This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
everything I
have said is a lie.



TwistyCreek

2006-03-06, 8:45 pm

In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> Any chance of adding a filter to stop multiple copies when your remailer is
> used as an exit remailer?
> Thank you.


All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
then
multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
date/time
stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=

This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
everything I
have said is a lie.



Thrasher Remailer

2006-03-07, 2:46 am

In article <NK5HPKAB38782.8595833333@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
> TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
> then
> multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
> date/time
> stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=
>
> This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
> everything I
> have said is a lie.


Good try but there is too much time between the original and your atempts.













Thrasher Remailer

2006-03-07, 2:46 am

In article <NK5HPKAB38782.8595833333@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
> TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
> then
> multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
> date/time
> stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=
>
> This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
> everything I
> have said is a lie.


Good try but there is too much time between the original and your atempts.













Thrasher Remailer

2006-03-07, 2:46 am

In article <NK5HPKAB38782.8595833333@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
> TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
> then
> multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
> date/time
> stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=
>
> This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
> everything I
> have said is a lie.


Good try but there is too much time between the original and your atempts.













TwistyCreek

2006-03-07, 2:46 am

In article <0F793Y1Q38782.8674652778@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> In article <TB2CTOLU38782.7357291667@twistycreek.com>
> TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> All remailers do. if you are seeing multiple copies of the same message
> then
> multiple instances of the one message are being sent with different
> date/time
> stamp rather than multiple copies using copies=
>
> This is copies=10. you should only see it once. If you see 10 then
> everything I
> have said is a lie.


Good try but there is too much time between the original and your atempts.













Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com