|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > March 2006 > mixmaster 3 for win32 binary
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
mixmaster 3 for win32 binary
|
|
| Mae Bee 2006-03-23, 8:53 pm |
| Hi all,
where can I find win32 binaries of recent mixmaster versions (3.0b or
even 2.9.1)? Have no VCPP compiler at hand, and SourceForge only
provides a win16 .exe from 2002 ;-(
Regards
Mae
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-03-23, 8:53 pm |
| In article <nmg522hv0jggl2vritjhnrjq57mhovtq3e@4ax.com>
Mae Bee <mae.bee@fake.info> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> where can I find win32 binaries of recent mixmaster versions (3.0b or
> even 2.9.1)? Have no VCPP compiler at hand, and SourceForge only
> provides a win16 .exe from 2002 ;-(
>
> Regards
>
> Mae
The Microsoft compiler can be downloaded legally for free at
microsoft.com
There are no binaries put out by the mixmaster dev team, just source.
Binaries from any other source are useless as you won't know if any
code has been inserted.
| |
| Thrasher Admin 2006-03-23, 8:53 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <nmg522hv0jggl2vritjhnrjq57mhovtq3e@4ax.com>
Mae Bee <mae.bee@fake.info> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> where can I find win32 binaries of recent mixmaster versions (3.0b or
> even 2.9.1)? Have no VCPP compiler at hand, and SourceForge only
> provides a win16 .exe from 2002 ;-(
To the best of my knowledge (which isn't all that great), the latest compiled
Win32 binaries available publicly is Mix29b39.
- --
Cheers,
Thrasher...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRCK1iWe9vBuCUlx7AQEN6AgAqXy8QznO
aPJf0+AaPU3+VGQro0zDQ4bO
wzYHmML+Hzc3lSASUk4WP+guYGrnCw+uYysIowkk
VUabZw5bzY+y847o/tg90pnb
yHCDGzS+5eM2fVJe9ovsg2Mqli3GMub4uFUCo4KN
sSozgIkDLPkXxnb4wPh9022H
2n/By/ xXhv5aSN5Qxjzux9a85HhHG5P9lFtyYeSubDcrCR
iL6FRGLce7dm9YU5Wn
YyUsRyRfN2XMeYO17y2XLDfDyIjRz040ku/XVBl0sT+/kXJVb2aw/sOdj1Fjurbc
l0MSvt6KpMSllpv26mbGqxsN9/eEur9l8V3Hq/3xFnDpvXk5rDifOw==
=jk/r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Mae Bee 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> - Thu, 23 Mar 2006
15:02:55 -0700 (MST):
>
>The Microsoft compiler can be downloaded legally for free at
>microsoft.com
So I gave it a try, and, not being an C++ expert, tried hard to build
the mixmaster binaries on my own (with gcc/MinGW and VCpp2005Express)
- but didn't succeed, mostly because of incompatible make files :-(
>There are no binaries put out by the mixmaster dev team, just source.
So, with no more than an ancient 16 bit dos binary available from
'official' sources, mixmaster seems to be a tool only for the
widespread ****x community, and not for the neglectable few average
Windoze users. What a pitty!
>Binaries from any other source are useless as you won't know if any
>code has been inserted.
D'accord. But I can't understand, why release versions (e.g. 2.9.1
from 2003) aren't made available as binaries by the developers.
Regards
Mae
| |
| Mae Bee 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Thrasher Admin <thrasher_admin@reece.net.au> - 23 Mar 2006 22:52:06
-0000:
>To the best of my knowledge (which isn't all that great), the latest compiled
>Win32 binaries available publicly is Mix29b39.
Thanks. I got it from the QS site. However it doesn't seem to support
the -o argument any longer, which allows to redirect an ASCII output
like
To: mix@outel.org
::
Remailer-Type: Mixmaster 2.0.4b46-reliable
-----BEGIN REMAILER MESSAGE-----
20480
kKehQIwxQp9HqndpUWPODA==
cTZ3uu73nt6AibLgU4EntYCv+dXGP/VYjKw5P/0S
7IA/APCmu2XGHXvnpgxPY/6jXVmeBLJRRx2WwAqy
...
okrVearryZblwJDXB2+fHKItWVPSQae0J9u+BMXG
ofkx7fO5RqE5K1VeHVvQru8XF6ftalhB3O3MCbOC
Nx1cy20r9pUaqhVYDrCOIavQhfc=
-----END REMAILER MESSAGE-----
e.g. to stdout. And I'm looking for a 32 bit binary with stdin/stdout
capability, which, with a command similar to
mixmaster stdin -to a@b.com -o stdout -l 0 0 0 dizum
would allow direct in-memory communication without unsecure file
savings, so that I'm able to send the output using my own mail client.
Any help would be appreciated.
Mae
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 12:35:06
Mae Bee <mae.bee@fake.info> wrote:
>
> So, with no more than an ancient 16 bit dos binary available from
> 'official' sources, mixmaster seems to be a tool only for the
> widespread ****x community, and not for the neglectable few average
> Windoze users. What a pitty!
I don't understand your point. Mixmaster can be used from Windows by a number
of clients - JBN or QS for example. It isn't the binary availabilty that is at
fault, but the clients that are available to use it might just not suit you.
Or your current news/email client might not suit it; but that isn't
mixmaster's fault. I use Sylpheed/Vim, for example, which works as a threaded
email/news client and can call mixmaster to send a message via remailers
directly : the methods are out there, you just need to look outside the box.
By the way, the later binary (mix29b39) uses *,* style syntax, not the 0 0
syntax of the old version to list a remailer chain, and chains is now -c not -n.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| In article <l49f22ti56cgf78mf1lihcfe43k9bjjai8@4ax.com>
Mae Bee <mae.bee@fake.info> wrote:
>
> So, with no more than an ancient 16 bit dos binary available from
> 'official' sources, mixmaster seems to be a tool only for the
> widespread ****x community, and not for the neglectable few average
> Windoze users. What a pitty!
The plan was to release binaries for win32. If you look in the source
code, you will see they even created a windows mixmaster gui installer.
The last I heard, weasel (the guy who was doing it) lost his windows
box and with it the capability to finish it off.
According to Zax, the next version is going to be released soon. This
may come with a win32 binary release, as the TODO file indicates this
is a priority.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| In article <eef23896294780291f65dbe83c2bba6a@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> By the way, the later binary (mix29b39) uses *,* style syntax, not the 0 0
> syntax of the old version to list a remailer chain, and chains is now -c not -n.
This binary, used by QS, already seemed dodgy to me. Richard claimed
that disastry had built it some years ago, but Richard couldn't find
the PGP signature or the source code.
There's no way of knowing if it was modified.
| |
| Mae Bee 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:50:03 +0200
(CEST):
>By the way, the later binary (mix29b39) uses *,* style syntax, not the 0 0
>syntax of the old version to list a remailer chain, and chains is now -c not -n.
I'm familiar with that, but it had to be a 2.0.4 example, while this
seems to be the only (compiled) version with the option to get back
the converted data (via -o resp. -O).
Regards
Mae
| |
| Mae Bee 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> - Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:44:19 -0500
(EST):
>The plan was to release binaries for win32. If you look in the source
>code, you will see they even created a windows mixmaster gui installer.
Yes, within 3.0b.
>The last I heard, weasel (the guy who was doing it) lost his windows
>box and with it the capability to finish it off.
I'm glad to hear, that I didn't fail due to my incompetence in Cpp.
>According to Zax, the next version is going to be released soon. This
>may come with a win32 binary release, as the TODO file indicates this
>is a priority.
A favourable prospect. Are there public sources for such data?
Thanks
Mae
|
|
|
|
|