|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > March 2006 > Change To Newsanon Utility
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Change To Newsanon Utility
|
|
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
message in the format
To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
random.
Several variations, including multiple newsgroups, are available; send an
email to remailer@eelbash.org, with a subject of: remailer-help for the
details.
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEJaruEC+g9Qawm6QRAtk9AKDF2j5Tkbb6
toPjhNfJM6qY/sGnUACg0qJR
2aBLcRwhL70SFQpNyXEjH9g=
=Xfkk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonyma 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Oh, what's wrong, poor retarded child eelbash? Is ums not getting enough
traffic? Have too many people caught onto your silly little games of
gathering anonymous users info for god knows what reason? Too many people
who choose not to wind up in the eelbash database?
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
>consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
>If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
>message in the format
>
> To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
>for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
>nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
>
>You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
>random.
>
>Several variations, including multiple newsgroups, are available; send an
>email to remailer@eelbash.org, with a subject of: remailer-help for the
>details.
>
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <pan.2006.03.25.20.42.29.232996@eelbash.org>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
> consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
> If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
> message in the format
>
> To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
> for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
> nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
>
> You must code 3-digits or the nickname and domain that are used will be
> random.
So, I use some weird syntax to get a from nickname of _your_ choosing.
Then I get your 'civil' content filters applied to my message, which
means my message may or may not get accepted depending on your mood.
Then my message, if accepted as a civil message, gets forwarded to a
real mail2news server.
Alternatively, I could just send to that real mail2news server in the
first place, cutting out your censoring middleman. Difficult choice...
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| > The newsanon utility has changed with the addition of a facility for a
> consistent 'from' nickname and domain.
>
> If you want to use a consistent 'from' nickname and domain, then send the
> message in the format
>
> To: alias_999_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org.
>
> for example: To: alias_023_alt.privacy@newsanon.org will put a particular
> nickname and domain in the message that arrives at alt.privacy.
Wow, that's just so much easier than putting a name in the From header
and sending to a normal mail2news. Not.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Helen Scarth wrote:
> The newsanon utility has changed
Well now there's a real shock.....
| |
| Somo Wiesnrat 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:20:56 -0700, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
> Wow, that's just so much easier than putting a name in the From header and
> sending to a normal mail2news. Not.
Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
little fun and maybe also some serious remail.
And I dont forget to thank ALL remailer oprators for there work
making us to have the anonymous emails that we want.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
> Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.
Eelbash, let me be the first to congratulate you on the birth of your
new sock puppet. I'm sure you and your new imaginary persona will be
very happy together.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <BWVXB69G38801.7515740741@anonymous.poster>
Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
Of _course_ you use it. It's your service. How stupid do you think
people are eelbash? Silly question; I think we all know from your
previous posts that you think you're far superior to everyone else.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
What an entirely convincing personality. Nobody will ever guess it's
you! *yawn*
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On 25 Mar 2006, Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:20:56 -0700, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
>
>Its not bad.
Yes, it IS bad. See below. |
|
|
\|/
[vbcol=seagreen]
>In article <YJLAY9F138147.4308217593@Gilgamesh-Frog.org>, Eelbash Admin
><Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header>
>wrote:
>
In addition to this arrogance, remember he also publicly campaigned for the
delisting of Austria and Dizum. He also told us that because of his
breeding, he was superior to the rest of us.
This all came after his failed attempt to institute hate-speech filters and
his "editing" of his users posts. This "superior champion of privacy" used
to read and edit users posts to make sure they met his criteria for
political correctness.
Then came his admission that he was unaware that mixmaster was a server as
well as a client, and that he had no clue what a "partitioning attack" was,
despite having run a remailer for "...over 15 years" (a blatant, bald-faced
LIE).
So his remailer was cut off from the rest of the network, become the one
and only remailer in the history of the network to receive a Remailer Death
Penalty, or RDP. Shortly thereafter, he tried to sneak back in as "Bushwa".
He was busted. Then he came back with "greatwall", despite the fact that
remailer names are supposed to observe an 8 character limit.
So now he is back again, as Asmodeus, although he is still crippled by only
being listed by 8 remailers, and 2 pingers.
His "career" as a remop is studded with examples like the ones above. If
you can find them, you can check out posts about his monitoring and
filtering behavior on past remailers he has run. The ones we know about
are:
eelbash
axloltl
axolotl2
cheshire
congo
bog
bogg
eelbash (again)
bushwa
greatwall
asmodeus
| |
| Anonymous 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| > Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.
People in China, people who need to whistleblow, people who are hiding
from abusive spouses, they don't get to use remailers for 'fun'.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <BWVXB69G38801.7515740741@anonymous.poster>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
> Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.
There's nothing funnier in this group than Eelbash trying to pretend
he's someone else and failing miserably.
Still not quite up to the "little old lady" standard you set in
<3JD72CIW38639.3398726852@reece.net.au> but I'll give you a
C for effort; try harder next time.
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <BWVXB69G38801.7515740741@anonymous.poster>
Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Its not bad. I use it, oy, maybe 1 or 2 years off and on and its
> working! Use it at the end of a chain and you ALWAYS! have the
> fullest-from header! I used to worry wich one is the last exit
> remailer with fullest-from??? now I think who gives a XXXX!! just
> make sure newsanon is the last one and i alwyas have full-from!.
> Yes and I make up my name. This is remailers right??? So you have a
> little fun and maybe also some serious remail.
You may as well have PGP signed this, eelbash. It's *that* obvious.
| |
| anonymous@remailer.hastio.org 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:20:02 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> What an entirely convincing personality. Nobody will ever guess it's you!
> *yawn*
I wish you kids, all of you, would knock this off. The utility is useful,
to a degree, and nothing more needs to be said about its announcement;
certainly not the nonsense that has been put out this afternoon.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On 26 Mar 2006, anonymous@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:20:02 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>
>I wish you kids, all of you, would knock this off. The utility is useful,
>to a degree, and nothing more needs to be said about its announcement;
>certainly not the nonsense that has been put out this afternoon.
XXXX off, eelbash.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| anonymous@remailer.hastio.org wrote:
>
> I wish you kids, all of you, would knock this off. The utility is useful,
> to a degree, and nothing more needs to be said about its announcement;
It's certainly useful for partitioning the couple of users who may be
duped into using it, reducing their anonymity set to a miniscule number of
messages that theirs can hide in.
All those hundreds of different address syntaxes too! Ahhh, a profilers
dream. Thanks eelbash, yet another useful contribution from you.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <LB6X4NVV38802.1534027778@anonymous.poster>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> The utility is useful,
All it does is forward a message to a mail2news server (after
filtering anything that you don't like). It provides nothing of value.
If people want an alt.newsgroup@domain syntax they can use Bigapple or
LCs mail2news servers. They actually provide a usenet posting service.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| > I wish you kids, all of you, would knock this off.
Calling _other_ people kids?
You're the one pretending to be other people just to try
and make people think that someone, anyone, actually agrees
with your methods.
Hardly the actions of a mature, sane adult.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| eelbash pretending not to be eelbash wrote:
>
> I wish you kids, all of you, would knock this off.
If you dislike posts appearing reminding people of how much you censor,
how much you try and make anonymous posts to back yourself up, how much
you generally XXXX up people's anonymity, then I suggest you create a
web forum on eelbash.org where you can filter all posts that you
dislike to your hearts content.
| |
| anonymous@remailer.hastio.org 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article < c13e314106b7f0cc6af935dd08c4ef84@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
> XXXX off, eelbash.
Heh, that's about the only thing worth saying to him. If you go into a
long detailed post explaining in detail about why he's wrong, why
everyone dislikes him, he just completely ignores the whole thing. In
his world, he's right and everyone else is wrong, with nothing that
disagrees with his world view penetrating his skull.
So I'll just say XXXX off to him too.
XXXX off, eelbash!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Anonyma wrote:
>
> Still not quite up to the "little old lady" standard you set in
> <3JD72CIW38639.3398726852@reece.net.au> but I'll give you a
> C for effort; try harder next time.
That's truly a classic. I doubt he'll ever top it, unless he pretends
to be a transexual gay dwarf called Ernie who just happens to think
content filtering rocks and that eelbash is the king of all remops.
| |
| Fritz Wuehler 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <IKMKWY5638801.7858449074@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> Somo Wiesnrat <Wiesnrat@Meine.Upharsam.Con> wrote:
>
> Eelbash, let me be the first to congratulate you on the birth of your
> new sock puppet. I'm sure you and your new imaginary persona will be
> very happy together.
Did he ever pay up after losing his bet about not changing anything
on his remailer for a month? I'm guessing not.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| Anonymous wrote:
> In article <LB6X4NVV38802.1534027778@anonymous.poster> admin
> <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> All it does is forward a message to a mail2news server (after filtering
> anything that you don't like). It provides nothing of value.
>
> If people want an alt.newsgroup@domain syntax they can use Bigapple or LCs
> mail2news servers. They actually provide a usenet posting service.
And do it without the Eeltard data mining operation being involved....
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:25:53 +0200, Anonymous wrote:
> In article <LB6X4NVV38802.1534027778@anonymous.poster> admin
> <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> All it does is forward a message to a mail2news server
That's not correct. It sends the message directly to the newsgroup(s).
>(after filtering
> anything that you don't like).
That's also incorrect. The only filtering is on duplicate messages.
> It provides nothing of value.
I have to disagree. It seems to me it is a valuable utility because it
allows you:
a. to send an anonymous message without revealing your 'from'
address or ip information, and to do it without changing the 'from' header
in your remailer client. All you need to do is to make the to field:
To: alias_newsgroup@newsanon.org
and it will generate a random nickname/domain as your from header.
b. to create an instant newsgroup persona by specifying a 3-digit number.
For example To: alias_123_newsgroup@newsanon.org
creates the same nickname/domain for your from header every time.
c. to send to as many as 5 newsgroups. Just code, for example,
To: alias_group1..group2..group3..group4..group5@newsanon.org
or
To: alias_123_group1..group2..group3..group4..group5@newsanon.org
You may disagree that those are useful, but I'd say they are.
>
> If people want an alt.newsgroup@domain syntax they can use Bigapple
As I've said before, bigapple's service is excellent, but it always keeps
whatever 'from' header you are using in your news/email client. That's a
security risk if you are careless when sending your message.
Also, it allows you to send to only one newsgroup (as far as I know),
while the newsanon utility lets you send to as many as 5.
Also, and I may be mistaken, but I think bigapple sends the messages to
the newsgroup via a mail2news gateway, not directly.
> or LCs
> mail2news servers. They actually provide a usenet posting service.
With respect, I believe that the newsanon utility actually provides a
usenet posting service as well.
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEJp59EC+g9Qawm6QRAp1qAJ9Llubo5qzM
SVmALbLZk9nwJexJTgCgsPor
+3+DXiLsHFcrDQyx1CIMfpI=
=foWl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| BigappleAdmin 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <pan.2006.03.26.14.01.43.538107@eelbash.org>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
> Also, and I may be mistaken, but I think bigapple sends the messages to
> the newsgroup via a mail2news gateway, not directly.
>
You are mistaken. The m2n sends directly to 2 upstream newsservers. The remailer sends to a gateway.
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 15:08:42 +0000, BigappleAdmin wrote:
> In article <pan.2006.03.26.14.01.43.538107@eelbash.org> admin
> <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
>
> You are mistaken. The m2n sends directly to 2 upstream newsservers. The
> remailer sends to a gateway.
Thanks for the correction.
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEJrKCEC+g9Qawm6QRAsMQAJ4vtFRUmlkw
v2BA/hMBNz9rq1I1fACg+aJA
lMdUqXXPHf1MkDs9OcE/+pg=
=A+RA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| George Orwell 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| In article <pan.2006.03.26.14.01.43.538107@eelbash.org>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
>
> That's also incorrect. The only filtering is on duplicate messages.
History shows a different story.
6 years of censoring, and calling for other remops to censor, do you
really expect people to believe your claims that this 'utility' suddenly
does not filter?
When it comes to anonymity and freedom of speech, reputation matters.
Nobody is going to trust anything run by you.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| admin@eelbash.org wrote:
>
>
> That's not correct. It sends the message directly to the newsgroup(s).
That must be a recent change. It always used to send to another
mail2news server.
If you are now posting directly to usenet through your own accounts,
you should advertise it as a mail2news gateway rather than as a
utility.
>
> That's also incorrect. The only filtering is on duplicate messages.
Sorry, but I, and I imagine many others, will find that hard to
believe given past events. Maybe with time the wounds you caused will
start to heal and you will gain some element of trust back, but it
will take time.
> a. to send an anonymous message without revealing your 'from'
> address or ip information, and to do it without changing the 'from' header
> in your remailer client. All you need to do is to make the to field:
> To: alias_newsgroup@newsanon.org
> and it will generate a random nickname/domain as your from header.
How would I go about using my own From header. Will it remove it if I
specify one normally, or is that something I need to specify in the To:
field?
> c. to send to as many as 5 newsgroups. Just code, for example,
> To: alias_group1..group2..group3..group4..group5@newsanon.org
> or
> To: alias_123_group1..group2..group3..group4..group5@newsanon.org
That's probably the most useful element. Bigapple and LCS only allow
one newsgroup on the address line AFAIK. Being able to crosspost could make
it useful for using with Mixminion, which can't use normal mail2news
gateways.
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:09:37 +0000, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> How would I go about using my own From header. Will it remove it if I
> specify one normally, or is that something I need to specify in the To:
> field?
some.newsgroup@newsanon.org uses your From header.
Anything starting with 'alias_' uses some kind of generated From header,
though you can 'generate' your own:
alias_Joe.Blow|somedomain.com_some.newsgroup@newsanon.org
generates
From: Joe Blow <Blow@somedomain.com>
The details are in the Eelbash remailer help file.
*
*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEJr8yEC+g9Qawm6QRAkRMAJ0TuUbzJIL6
HguexXYzD+BwSUiS5wCg7IFA
qCGnhqNdCpInMAd5TJ7EYUU=
=1qyM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| >>(after filtering
>
> That's also incorrect. The only filtering is on duplicate messages.
You've been censoring since 2000. A sudden declaration that you won't
be filtering has zero credibility, chump.
You'd be better off shutting down and reopening under a new identity,
as nobody can trust anything you run when they know it's run by you.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-03-27, 7:52 am |
| On 26 Mar 2006, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
>admin@eelbash.org wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>That's probably the most useful element. Bigapple and LCS only allow
>one newsgroup on the address line AFAIK. Being able to crosspost could make
>it useful for using with Mixminion, which can't use normal mail2news
>gateways.
ENCODING NEWSGROUPS IN THE ADDRESS:
If you cannot figure out a way to add a Newsgroups header to your mail
messages, you can instead include the list of newsgroups to which you
wish to post in the mail2news E-mail address. To post to group
alt.test, for instance, you can send mail to:
<mail2news-YYYYMMDD-alt.test@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
where YYYYMMDD is the current date (year, month, day). To post to
multiple groups, you can separate them with "+" characters. For
instance, to post to alt.test and misc.test, send mail to:
<mail2news-YYYYMMDD-alt.test+misc.test@anon.lcs.mit.edu>
You must use addresses of this form to cross-post articles. If
instead you address one message to several destinations of the form
<mail2news-YYYYMMDD-groupN>, your article will show up in at most one
of the groups you specify. This is a result of the way news servers
handle Message IDs; it is not a limitation of the mail2news software.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| In article < d4383c001fe03b7eae331247ca772cad@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> Helen Scarth wrote:
His name isn't Helen, XXXXtard. That was the name of the person
at the Domain Registrar that registered it. You will see her
name on a lot of domains.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-03-31, 12:11 am |
| Nomen Nescio wrote:
> In article < d4383c001fe03b7eae331247ca772cad@mixmast
er.it> George Orwell
> <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> His name isn't Helen, XXXXtard. That was the name of the person at the
> Domain Registrar that registered it. You will see her name on a lot of
> domains.
ROTFLMAO!
Helen you're TRULY pathetic.
http://tinyurl.com/roxq7
Anyone can ping www.treadles.ca and look up your own remailers old IP
that was posted here. Or ping your Teksavvy bullshit. They're the SAME
FSKING machine you looser. You moved the remailer because someone tied it
to your sewing machine web site and you were scared to death of your TOS.
Here's YOU using your circe@treadles.ca email address to post to the
[BKARTS] mailing list signing "Helen Scarth" and giving your web site
address.
http://tinyurl.com/k9h24
LOL!!
I think EVERYONE should go to http://www.treadles.ca and leaf through the
site for pictures of all your cats. No wonder you're such a fukup Helen.
You're a bitter old HAG who lives like a hermit with nothing but animals
for company. You snoop on posts because it's the only life you HAVE.
|
|
|
|
|