|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > April 2006 > Is there any free anonymous smtp server out there???
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Is there any free anonymous smtp server out there???
|
|
| rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| I'm going CRAZY trying to find such a program or service via an
external SMTP server.
Any ideas? Thanks!
| |
|
| On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:25:11 -0700, rootaccess.sistemas wrote:
> I'm going CRAZY trying to find such a program or service via an
> external SMTP server.
>
> Any ideas? Thanks!
What about signing up with one of the web services like yahoo.com, using
tor and privoxy? Or do you have something else in mind?
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm going CRAZY trying to find such a program or service via an
> external SMTP server.
>
> Any ideas? Thanks!
What volume of mail do you need to send?
Why isn't mixmaster or mixminion good enough for you?
Do you want to be replyable?
Thomas
- --
Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
shout"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBREYLawEP2l8iXKAJAQHwkAMfWgRy6KL5
rRaVZ6svX1qw36A/q1f79Aad
9OjPHUbeorKf7viVAW8N4/ pMzEtg9PVh0kbg57uKY3miY6htF0ueEkffTe9+qT
K9
tQ1wJmbpxncFgfcBhVBghOYDqOshEXpwu9rzaw==
=dE8L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| Yes, I need it to be repliable and I need to send quite some few emails
per hour... I downloaded quicksilver and that would be PERFECT if I
could use it as an smtp server to use with another program.
Sedge, what's Tor and Privoxy?
| |
| Anonymous 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| On 19 Apr 2006, "rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com"
<rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, I need it to be repliable and I need to send quite some few emails
>per hour... I downloaded quicksilver and that would be PERFECT if I
>could use it as an smtp server to use with another program.
>
>Sedge, what's Tor and Privoxy?
You sound like a spammer jsut getting started to me.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com wrote:
> Yes, I need it to be repliable and I need to send quite some few emails
> per hour... I downloaded quicksilver and that would be PERFECT if I
> could use it as an smtp server to use with another program.
It seems that you don't deserve it, but have a look at
http://www.noreply.org/tls/
On how to get replies, use an exit like Eelbash to allow custom from lines.
Now all you need is an anonymous pop server.
> Sedge, what's Tor and Privoxy?
Tor is for http mainly and it needs privoxy to be more anonymous.
Hopefully you won't ruin the remailer network for others,
Thomas
- --
Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
shout"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBREdkNgEP2l8iXKAJAQFjowMdGnua70W7
oL4oZuTOW0sTqfTjvoWOyVHa
SmVHwM909oKfm19ypmJo1OZS1z/D8J7h9rdQ7lViw6l+vJc439102bJsE6iUJSPc
q5L9c8m4BfHDHV6GXHi1hvICmW8uxpZ0GkWSMg==
=Ymh2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| In article <4447641a$0$31648$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> rootaccess.sistemas@gmail.com wrote:
>
> It seems that you don't deserve it, but have a look at
> http://www.noreply.org/tls/
>
> On how to get replies, use an exit like Eelbash to allow custom from lines.
>
> Now all you need is an anonymous pop server.
>
>
> Tor is for http mainly and it needs privoxy to be more anonymous.
>
> Hopefully you won't ruin the remailer network for others,
> Thomas
Don't wory about it Thomas. If he does, we'll just sic Twisted-Admin on to
him.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-04-20, 7:05 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> In article <4447641a$0$31648$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
[snip]
>
> Don't wory about it Thomas. If he does, we'll just sic Twisted-Admin on to
> him.
Twisty Admin :-)
Thomas
- --
Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
shout"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB4AwUBREgPgQEP2l8iXKAJAQGFoQMY8rSd56LF
6pf67gjGVfcJ0hXuSLbY6Qa7
w+9S6HLxF4y7SuSBz+awdVIxBzt54Z1PwY+e1Wwc
qr2xRdlP7HAFnqG+3kREiODc
bFX7dmAhgRyH2rKfDnxtVGbsiqDM7ttZnB7t
=2Hp+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| George Orwell 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| In article <4447641a$0$31648$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>
> Tor is for http mainly and it needs privoxy to be more anonymous.
Tor is not for http mainly at all. It supports 99% of TCP connections.
The only ports that are not supplied by anyone is usually port 25 because
of spam, however the tor node 'torture' has allowed port 25 for many
months now.
It also does not need privoxy to be more anonymous. Privoxy just makes
it easier for browsers to use, because it provides them with an HTTP
proxy interface which browsers support. Many browsers don't support
SOCKS.
Privoxy also scrubs some advertisements, but plugins for Firefox and
other browsers generally work better at that.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| George Orwell wrote:
> In article <4447641a$0$31648$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> "Thomas J. Boschloo"
> <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Tor is not for http mainly at all. It supports 99% of TCP connections. The
> only ports that are not supplied by anyone is usually port 25 because of
> spam, however the tor node 'torture' has allowed port 25 for many months
> now.
There's some other things blocked by the default torrc configuration, but
in general you're spot on up to this point. Tor is definitely more than an
HTTP tool, in fact a lot of people use it mostly for things like IRC and
IM. It's a full blown SOCKS proxy with an anonymity bonus. 
> It also does not need privoxy to be more anonymous. Privoxy just makes it
> easier for browsers to use, because it provides them with an HTTP proxy
> interface which browsers support. Many browsers don't support SOCKS.
>
> Privoxy also scrubs some advertisements, but plugins for Firefox and other
> browsers generally work better at that.
Nope. Privoxy does a lot more than scrub advertisements, and a lot more
than any browser can do. Without it you're probably leaking information
like a sieve, and most certainly are with the mainstream browsers.
Does your browser protect you from web bugs and other graphics based
tracking goodies?
Does your browser or plugin allow you to "anonymize" cookies with random
information so that sites which won't work without cookies can still be
accessed anonymously?
Does your browser scrub its own HTTP headers? Can you configure it to NOT
release things like OS and browser versions, or MIME type information
every time it makes a new connection? Or tell it to refuse to forward a
history of where you're coming from? Or a list of plugins you have
installed and running?
Does your browser allow you the flexibility to selectively reject or
accept specific content based on that content AND/OR its source?
There's more, but that's a good start....
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| In-Reply-To: < 7644e4ebb7641441714e65f2fee3d91e@mixmast
er.it>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0
OpenPGP: url=home.hccnet.nl/t.j.boschloo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <444a7910$0$31650$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.92.126.16
X-Trace: 1145731344 news.xs4all.nl 31650 [::ffff:82.92.126.16]:14946
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.privacy.anon-server:434085
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
George Orwell wrote:
> In article <4447641a$0$31648$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Tor is not for http mainly at all. It supports 99% of TCP connections.
> The only ports that are not supplied by anyone is usually port 25 because
> of spam, however the tor node 'torture' has allowed port 25 for many
> months now.
Well, it supports web browsing also.
Check out: http://www.onion-router.net/Summary.html
It was written with web surfing in mind and was also influenced by the
Freedom Network.
http://tor.freehaven.net/cvs/tor/do...tor-design.html
Thomas
- --
Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
shout"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBREp5CgEP2l8iXKAJAQFWZAMfQabjry48
F2NAueGD5+SukTO6SX9jKh5K
VEbRak+wSiv/Av0NyIaJYYoniznR10uwSfaLBQncJr/KTo/pKanMHU78WjQUaC4l
dlHhn0U9a/Msc5zN0bWV30rHa9iDWh2WWxRmMQ==
=oc3r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|