|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > April 2006 > Double Encrypted Messages from Panta
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Double Encrypted Messages from Panta
|
|
| Covenant PGP2 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| I am getting a double encrypted message from one of my nyms. I'm sure it's the activation email from panta that's required before the account can be used. It starts with:
-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
I don't have GnuPG and created my account using the PGP2 setup. How do I tell panta to only wrap my messages with PGP? I did edit my nym with a -cryptrecv switch. However, I still can't decrypt the messages coming from that account. I have successfully cr
eated a second account, with an activation email sent back to me as valid. I am now going to determine if the second account is in fact active.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Covenant PGP2 schreef:
> I am getting a double encrypted message from one of my nyms. I'm sure it's the activation email from panta that's required before the account can be used. It starts with:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> I don't have GnuPG and created my account using the PGP2 setup. How do I tell panta to only wrap my messages with PGP? I did edit my nym with a -cryptrecv switch. However, I still can't decrypt the messages coming from that account. I have successfully
created a second account, with an activation email sent back to me as valid. I am now going to determine if the second account is in fact active.
####
ATTN: If you use PGP 2.6.x you have to include "PGP2" into the userid of
you PGP key so the replies of the server will be encrypted in PGP2
compatibility mode.
####
Source: https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/nymserver
hth,
Thomas
- --
Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
shout"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBREu+wgEP2l8iXKAJAQFKTgMghMtgL20g
sKmfWoZSvw9Coenr1wHYAdbo
8YXUDyedK3kVqMcz6w02ke08cXb3m9QkRqOIuDcw
E41MA7dWb+b9yBY1880n6gBE
w5JHY1Ls6PxLgBAKaKcDL3YFvKy5ljQ4E8Mcug==
=eYLd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| George Orwell 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>I am getting a double encrypted message from one of my nyms. I'm sure it's
>the activation email from panta that's required before the account can be
>used. It starts with:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
>I don't have GnuPG and created my account using the PGP2 setup. How do I
>tell panta to only wrap my messages with PGP? I did edit my nym with a
>-cryptrecv switch. However, I still can't decrypt the messages coming from
>that account. I have successfully created a second account, with an
>activation email sent back to me as valid. I am now going to determine if
>the second account is in fact active.
This is (one of the reasons) why Quacksilver sucks. This stuff is all
user-transparent and quite painless under JBN.
| |
| Covenant PGP2 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote in message news:444bbea5$0$31639$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Covenant PGP2 schreef:
created a second account, with an activation email sent back to me as valid. I am now going to determine if the second account is in fact active.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> ####
> ATTN: If you use PGP 2.6.x you have to include "PGP2" into the userid of
> you PGP key so the replies of the server will be encrypted in PGP2
> compatibility mode.
> ####
>
> Source: https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/nymserver
>
> hth,
> Thomas
> - --
> Robert Heinlein: "When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and
> shout"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iQB5AwUBREu+wgEP2l8iXKAJAQFKTgMghMtgL20g
sKmfWoZSvw9Coenr1wHYAdbo
> 8YXUDyedK3kVqMcz6w02ke08cXb3m9QkRqOIuDcw
E41MA7dWb+b9yBY1880n6gBE
> w5JHY1Ls6PxLgBAKaKcDL3YFvKy5ljQ4E8Mcug==
> =eYLd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I did insert PGP2 into my user id for the question nym, yet I am still getting double encrypted messages with the inside message being encrypted with GnuPG.
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
>I did insert PGP2 into my user id for the question nym, yet I am still
>getting double encrypted messages with the inside message being encrypted
>with GnuPG.
The innermost layer of encryption should be encrypted to the key you sent
to the nymserver. If it isn't you're doing something wrong.
When PGP 6.5.8(ckt) is available for free on the internet, why the hell you
insist on GPG is beyond me.
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Non scrivetemi wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
>The innermost layer of encryption should be encrypted to the key you sent
>to the nymserver. If it isn't you're doing something wrong.
>
>When PGP 6.5.8(ckt) is available for free on the internet, why the hell you
>insist on GPG is beyond me.
OP uses PI w/ PGP 2.6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBREv2TfRwi/QFFzi5AQEjvwf/XDpLHVJiD2219acTOJZcG12iyM9JZ57M
J7fM2mK3G5F8Ukd7Vf1MjBD8aLNVrWApgPjz1CKW
nqmpKQb+ie+x4oPF+tyXeXW3
J2XUTh8xNLNxmTF5RYLYsXbaqZdyzI1h2XGMleG8
m4QB/m+6ACywUlOGytCENkpG
JjZoKjifyTjiriIMY8mJXqCkd9vsw355UU/1yc64pNvw6mPCnZ+AM9Qr1TrXAtIM
1WgfslSj4Cl28dudi7mhxf462VsAAuVOUlToVze8
MlsodtNPlaZb8j0WrSCTKxux
B/XvdxbfL5t6ctSZ+8hCa7ht6/GFcO3mWR0Q5i+N5dsGMAQF9xwqJg==
=TVfN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 wrote:
>I did insert PGP2 into my user id for the question nym, yet I am still getting
>double encrypted messages with the inside message being encrypted with GnuPG.
"inside" message is encrypt to your nymkey or is conventional?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBREv29fRwi/ QFFzi5AQGjzAf+LnJJJ5bp6BNde9TEsk0t2r5ose
r+dAv0
qlt8ZZ5VjLwhVQOiTrqsUE+Di/XwIyHHYykq0pIYAgK3+Shvl+OMnxLuVbGGkKg6
4YSNYABoasKmsSujVRZS7rNPIpioEx7v3tElU1xy
VY+/dewkJUMgm2LcuKFfI5iW
+9Jkcwas+I4BBJQxTEKpNxJj9YA8bNHZIxLs2Dhj
dyJ6w4eQeDN2gwheLNd9T1Y1
LDH+7AGvayOouAzhEERFktn8O2YFHA65MkBwhTeU
x3H+D3ByRJEoo0pKI/BpWean
3wcJpTBU+ebtacQBn6YXOOleBwTSgA6C9CckEInw
MJaKQ6ncgd2Knw==
=5pvU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| In article < 52ca7ac01e14a9def2113c476cb2bbe7@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
> This is (one of the reasons) why Quacksilver sucks. This stuff is all
> user-transparent and quite painless under JBN.
You're none to bright, are you? It has nothing to do with QS. The problems
are with PGP 2.6 and Private Idaho.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:40:47 +0000, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
> In article < 52ca7ac01e14a9def2113c476cb2bbe7@mixmast
er.it> George Orwell
> <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
> You're none to bright, are you? It has nothing to do with QS. The problems
> are with PGP 2.6 and Private Idaho.
That's Sassaman again, spreading anti-QS fud. Why to hell a supposedly
responsible individual would make stupid jokes like he does is a puzzle.
I will tell you this, if he continues to have _anything_ to do with
Mixminion, I will stay away from it.
| |
| Thrasher Remailer 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:40:47 +0000, Thrasher Remailer wrote:
>
>
>
>That's Sassaman again, spreading anti-QS fud. Why to hell a supposedly
>responsible individual would make stupid jokes like he does is a puzzle.
>
>I will tell you this, if he continues to have _anything_ to do with
>Mixminion, I will stay away from it.
It's not Sasaman, it's me. It's not a joke, either.
You're doing the same thing that you're accusing this Sassaman of doing,
spreading FUD. So go XXXX yourself.
| |
| A.Melon 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| On 24 Apr 2006, Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
>It's not Sasaman, it's me. It's not a joke, either.
>
>You're doing the same thing that you're accusing this Sassaman of doing,
>spreading FUD. So go XXXX yourself.
Sounds like a hypocrite to me!
| |
| George Orwell 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| "Non scrivetemi" <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
> The innermost layer of encryption should be encrypted to the key you sent
> to the nymserver. If it isn't you're doing something wrong.
>
> When PGP 6.5.8(ckt) is available for free on the internet, why the hell you
> insist on GPG is beyond me.
>
I can't speak for the op, but *I* insist on GPG because I've never seen a linux version of 6.5.8 ckt. That, and I believe that the open pgp standard is a good idea.
| |
| No Spam 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
|
"George Orwell" <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote in message
news:52ca7ac01e14a9def2113c476cb2bbe7@mi
xmaster.it...
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
> This is (one of the reasons) why Quacksilver sucks. This stuff is all
> user-transparent and quite painless under JBN.
>
You are one dumb shit, but every group needs a village idiot.
| |
| panta-admin 2006-04-24, 8:06 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi !
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>I am getting a double encrypted message from one of my nyms. I'm sure it's
>the activation email from panta that's required before the account can be
>used. It starts with:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
>I don't have GnuPG and created my account using the PGP2 setup. How do I
>tell panta to only wrap my messages with PGP? I did edit my nym with a
>-cryptrecv switch. However, I still can't decrypt the messages coming from
>that account. I have successfully created a second account, with an
>activation email sent back to me as valid. I am now going to determine if
>the second account is in fact active.
The Version line does not really matter, its just a comment.
Its the packet format of the encryption layer that was changed after PGP2.x
You should be able to decrypt the GnuPG message with PGP2, as my nymserver
will use the old packet format if you included PGP2 into your userID. As a
general note, GnuPG is perfectly compatible with PGP, as they both use the
same encryption standard (OpenPGP).
Why it is wrapped into two layers I dont know, but you got one nym working
so I am sure you will find out.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
panta-admin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBREx/ M9crLUqmoDLIEQL+rwCgzQZpqVeh+6yJUCg4Oioe
Onqj+GkAniIi
PyV2ynZMZBMXhaxzEJboX5tn
=RviT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-04-27, 6:54 am |
| In article <8a31a815b912accc8b7d4aa2cff7bc28@pseudo.borked.net>
admin <admin@eelbash.org> wrote:
>
>
> That's Sassaman again, spreading anti-QS fud. Why to hell a supposedly
> responsible individual would make stupid jokes like he does is a puzzle.
You're not very good at this, eelbash.
Len Sassaman *likes* QS. He has helped Richard to get it working with
Mixmaster, is fully supportive of QS, and loves the fact that someone
is still developing a windows mixmaster client. Richard, the author of
QS, considers Len a friend.
If you're going to try and copy Frog, at least get it right. Frog was
claiming that Len spread anti-*JBN2* fud, not anti-QS fud. You really
can't get anything right.
> I will tell you this, if he continues to have _anything_ to do with
> Mixminion, I will stay away from it.
Good, please do. Nobody wants you anywhere near Mixminion, eelbash.
| |
| Covenant PGP2 2006-04-29, 1:12 pm |
| "panta-admin" <anonymous@panta-rhei.dyndns.org> wrote in message news:M3DBORTY38831.3657523148@anonymous.poster...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi !
>
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Covenant PGP2 <covenant@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
>
> The Version line does not really matter, its just a comment.
> Its the packet format of the encryption layer that was changed after PGP2.x
> You should be able to decrypt the GnuPG message with PGP2, as my nymserver
> will use the old packet format if you included PGP2 into your userID. As a
> general note, GnuPG is perfectly compatible with PGP, as they both use the
> same encryption standard (OpenPGP).
>
> Why it is wrapped into two layers I dont know, but you got one nym working
> so I am sure you will find out.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Cheers,
> panta-admin
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQA/AwUBREx/ M9crLUqmoDLIEQL+rwCgzQZpqVeh+6yJUCg4Oioe
Onqj+GkAniIi
> PyV2ynZMZBMXhaxzEJboX5tn
> =RviT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
> is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
> than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
> for abuse and hashcash info.
>
Panta Admin and others, I have got one of my nyms working and I will attempt to create another one. I want to thank everyone for helping me resolve my issues. I like Private Idaho and would really like to stay with this application as long as possible, wh
ich means that I need to stay with PGP 2.6.X. It's unfortunate that I opened up a hornets nest with my questions to the group.
|
|
|
|
|