|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > June 2006 > Eelbash and his UDP Dizum campaign - revisited.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Eelbash and his UDP Dizum campaign - revisited.
|
|
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-06-24, 7:12 pm |
| Imagine that, our old buddy Jiang at it again. And using Dizum's M2N no
less, after his blew up on him.
Talk about your childish psycho....
****************
Path: <...> news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
Message-ID: <533GDX4V38892.6709953704@anonymous.poster>
From: admin <admin@eelbash.org>
Newsgroups: alt.hacker
Subject: [PING] HiEv
Date: 24 Jun 2006 21:06:14 -0000
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Remailer-Contact: Anonymous Mailer <DingoAdmin@DingoRemailer.com>
X-Spam-Processed: dingoremailer.com, Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:06:18 -0500
(not processed: recipient mail2news@anon.lcs.mit.edu in exclude file)
X-Return-Path: dingobounce@dingoremailer.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: mail2news@dizum.com
Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
Please email me at admin@eelbash.org, I think we can UDP Dizum.
****************
| |
|
| Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> Imagine that, our old buddy Jiang at it again. And using Dizum's M2N no
> less, after his blew up on him.
>
> Talk about your childish psycho....
>
> ****************
>
> Path: <...> news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
> Message-ID: <533GDX4V38892.6709953704@anonymous.poster>
> From: admin <admin@eelbash.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.hacker
> Subject: [PING] HiEv
[snip]
Well, it's not like the moron fooled anyone.
As the ping-ee it took me less than a minute to confirm that the post
was a cheesy forgery.
--
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence
has its limits.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-06-25, 7:17 pm |
|
Eelbash admin - is this genuine? Are you trying to UDP Dizum again?
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>Imagine that, our old buddy Jiang at it again. And using Dizum's M2N no
>less, after his blew up on him.
>
>Talk about your childish psycho....
>
>****************
>
>Path: <...> news.dizum.com!sewer-output!mail2news
>Message-ID: <533GDX4V38892.6709953704@anonymous.poster>
>From: admin <admin@eelbash.org>
>Newsgroups: alt.hacker
>Subject: [PING] HiEv
>Date: 24 Jun 2006 21:06:14 -0000
>X-No-Archive: yes
>X-Remailer-Contact: Anonymous Mailer <DingoAdmin@DingoRemailer.com>
>X-Spam-Processed: dingoremailer.com, Sat, 24 Jun 2006 16:06:18 -0500
> (not processed: recipient mail2news@anon.lcs.mit.edu in exclude file)
>X-Return-Path: dingobounce@dingoremailer.com
>X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: mail2news@dizum.com
>Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@dizum.com
>Organization: mail2news@dizum.com
>
>Please email me at admin@eelbash.org, I think we can UDP Dizum.
>
>****************
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-06-26, 1:12 am |
| HiEv wrote:
Added AH, FUP set to AP/APAS....
> Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Well, it's not like the moron fooled anyone.
>
> As the ping-ee it took me less than a minute to confirm that the post
> was a cheesy forgery.
I'll bet you have no idea who you're dealing with here. It wouldn't be
the first time he's forged posts from himself or trotted out sock
puppets to try and make a point. And it wouldn't be the first time he's
gone on a crusade against Dizum. In fact it's been theorized he flooded
the privacy groups in an almost identical way to what you are/were
experiencing in alt.hacker. The References header anomalies you noted
are straight out of a script he "borrowed" from another anonymous
poster and then mangled, in fact.
He's been caught red handed trying to surreptitiously run multiple
remailers for the purposes of tracking posters, accused innocent people
because he's so incompetent his snooping lead him to incorrect
conclusions, and filtered and edited other peoples messages.
You apparently have no valid contact info in your posts, so it wouldn't
surprise me or probably anyone else to find that the miscreant did post
anonymously and fail to sign a post just so he could get someones
attention and still be able to disclaim it later. The last attempt sort
of "backfired", if you catch my drift. ;)
Jiang apparently has absolutely noting in the world to do but sit at a
keyboard and figure out new ways to meddle in the remailer network.
Could it be a "forgery"? Yeah, it could. Is it likely? I'd give it
about an 80/20 chance against.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| |
|
| Non scrivetemi wrote:
> HiEv wrote:
>
> Added AH, FUP set to AP/APAS....
Actually, you either didn't set the followups or they got stripped out.
>
> I'll bet you have no idea who you're dealing with here.
[snip]
Nope, and I have no idea who you are either or why I should take your
word on what you say.
Frankly, it sounded like you weren't too sure of who that was either.
All I can say is that it didn't look like the Eelbash admin, and I'm not
going to try to make a bigger conspiracy out of it than that.
--
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence
has its limits.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-06-26, 1:12 am |
| TwistyCreek wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Nope, the Eelbash admin pgp-signs all his posts. that is not signed
> and is therefore phfony
that's exactly what eelbash would say....
>
>
>
>
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-06-26, 7:13 am |
| In alt.privacy.anon-server,alt.privacy,alt.hacker, spam@someoneelse.invalid
wrote:
>Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
>Actually, you either didn't set the followups or they got stripped out.
>
>[snip]
>
>Nope, and I have no idea who you are either or why I should take your
>word on what you say.
>
>Frankly, it sounded like you weren't too sure of who that was either.
>
>All I can say is that it didn't look like the Eelbash admin, and I'm not
>going to try to make a bigger conspiracy out of it than that.
>
A wise statement from a wise man. Well said. BTW, I agree.
|
|
|
|
|