Anonymous Servers - Re: www.findnot.com

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > June 2006 > Re: www.findnot.com





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: www.findnot.com
Nomen Nescio

2006-06-28, 1:14 pm

traveler 66 wrote:

>
> "Stephen K. Gielda" <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1f0bfc3efadb5799897a3@news.newsreader.com...
> a
> really
> the
> t
>
> No you weren't, anonymizer was, they were the first company to
> develope the secure tunnel years ago. Up until about a year ago, you
> didn't even offer a secure tunnel.


Your reading comprehension sucks donkey balls. Almost as bad as your
spelling.

Cotse was the first to offer any of it WITHOUT ALL THE BULLSHIT.
Anonymizer saw that business model and followed suite.

>
>
> The only uproar is the one you and your trolls cause when you play
> your self righteous card.


False. the only uproar is about your lies, your deceptions, and now
your failure. <snicker>

Other honest privacy services have no problem at all here. Just the few
who claim they can perform magic, and use ignorant little puppets
like you to disrupt newsgroups to cover up the fact that they can't
when intelligent people point it out.

Guess what puppet, you're losing. Cotse is still here and TWO of your
snake oil services just bit the dust. Gone.

I'm almost surprised we haven't seen more people screaming about
loosing their money, except that when you thhink about it, we probably
won't because they didn't have any business to begin with. People can
spot a snake when they see one with a little help, and they don't
usually associate themselves with them.

>
> So do others, they just don't troll the way you and your trolls do,


No they don't liar, they fame false, impossible claims like "can't be
traced" and "totally anonymous". Things they can never provide no
matter how many times shills like you screech "can to" with no evidence
at all. They make prejudicial statements about certain jurisdictions to
play on the fears of potential customers, then put their own servers in
places that are 100 times WORSE.

Remember your stupid "SSH tunnel" fiasco, and how you swore up and down
everyone looked like they were connected from localhost to any admin?

Remember the command line Steve gave you that proved you wrong, and how
you had to waffle and back peddle with some shit about those commands
"not being installed on your machines"?

You're an incompetent, and a liar. You've been made to look the fool so
many times it's almost TOO pathetic. You're the privacy community's
number one village idiot, court jester, and football all rolled up into
one, and you show no signs of ever eve TRYING to

> oh yes, other privacy companies do things differently than you do,
> and it's not only one or two of them.
>
>
> Have a nice day slick.


I'm sure he does. Most every day. See, that's how it is when you run an
HONEST business that's still healthy. You don't have t worry about how
you're going to pay for your bandwidth. And you don't have to use
pathetic little puppets to argue your case for you with the same lies
and BULLSHIT they've been spreading for over a year straight after
you've failed miserably.

LOL!

>
>




























































Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com