| Author |
trouble setting up hashcash for panta
|
|
| Anonyma 2006-06-30, 1:13 pm |
| I've installed the hashcash software (on Linux). Panta website
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/hashcash/index.html
says the header should like this
X-Hashcash: 0:03091422:panta-rhei:0d13dc41b034506f
but the program output looks very different!
$ hashcash -m -b 27 -e 60 -X panta-rhei
X-Hashcash: 1:27:060630133253:panta-rhei::kxAsch0XMi3ZUz3r:0aaCL
What am I doing wrong?
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-06-30, 1:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonyma schreef:
> I've installed the hashcash software (on Linux). Panta website
>
> http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/hashcash/index.html
>
> says the header should like this
>
> X-Hashcash: 0:03091422:panta-rhei:0d13dc41b034506f
This is a version 0 token.
> but the program output looks very different!
>
> $ hashcash -m -b 27 -e 60 -X panta-rhei
> X-Hashcash: 1:27:060630133253:panta-rhei::kxAsch0XMi3ZUz3r:0aaCL
This is a version 1 token.
> What am I doing wrong?
Nothing, just a newer version of the client software and an older
version of the panta docs.
There are also three ways of 'compressing' a version 1 token to add to
the confusion (with the -Z option).
See http://hashcash.org/docs/hashcash.html
Thomas
- --
"When paranoia is outlawed .."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRKVBzwEP2l8iXKAJAQG41gMgg2nh7DIi
769ui+HuJE0ZT4BLogJeAnEn
5rrI6Ja8XztZ4obwPnq+wC93mEN4NdRT3lQ2r0L1
0/KgZedLZmSbjWCcXvna00Ws
KGnFBYCKZPslSBy8sjtlzBfZBI3TOs2JVH5EaA==
=HdJv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2006-06-30, 1:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thomas J. Boschloo schreef:
> Anonyma schreef:
[snip][vbcol=seagreen]
On second thought, this is very bad. You created this token on 30th June
2006, 13:32 and 53 seconds. I have no idea how that happened.
Try -z 6
and -a -3d
on top of what you are using
That should give you less chance of partitioning yourself,
Thomas
- --
"When paranoia is outlawed .."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRKVJtwEP2l8iXKAJAQEDSQMfdjCVFxR7
8DDEHdBKGMUmJEwyVAlxx6ka
93MWzZQAjYoWpLJB/ ATF1li7hMcbXveRk+M07CCz1P4lpZaEKOFD7cUd5
7+wlyqi
FpzAXtHFPL0OUtFdaz2PaLdUa9vw05gpHHfntQ==
=WjCy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous via Panta Rhei 2006-06-30, 1:13 pm |
| In article <79e0ea50fc9c61a3950d52553aa14728@deuxpi.ca>
Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
> I've installed the hashcash software (on Linux). Panta website
>
> http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/hashcash/index.html
>
> says the header should like this
>
> X-Hashcash: 0:03091422:panta-rhei:0d13dc41b034506f
>
> but the program output looks very different!
>
> $ hashcash -m -b 27 -e 60 -X panta-rhei
> X-Hashcash: 1:27:060630133253:panta-rhei::kxAsch0XMi3ZUz3r:0aaCL
>
> What am I doing wrong?
Try this:
$ hashcash -m -b 27 -r panta-rhei -e 60 -X
creates something like this:
X-Hashcash: 1:27:060630:panta-rhei::GPwfJQeKnfbNiWTA:000000BqylN
which is exactly how this message got to you.
Hashcash seems to have preference for parameter order and as Thomas said,
version one does look different than version 0.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| Anonyma 2006-06-30, 7:12 pm |
| "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Anonyma schreef:
>
> This is a version 0 token.
>
>
> This is a version 1 token.
>
>
> Nothing, just a newer version of the client software and an older
> version of the panta docs.
Thanks!
Will panta's present remailer/mail2news accept the version 1 token?
> There are also three ways of 'compressing' a version 1 token to add to
> the confusion (with the -Z option).
>
> See http://hashcash.org/docs/hashcash.html
or do I need to add to my own confusion (compress)?
| |
| BiKiKii Admin 2006-06-30, 7:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Anonyma wrote:
>Will panta's present remailer/mail2news accept the version 1 token?
>
Don't think so...
The version of Hachcash (v1.8 ?) supplied with latest source of
Panta's Reliable v1.0.6rc2 is a version which only verifies hashcash
version 0 stamps.
Ciao!
BiKiKii
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRKV5d/Rwi/QFFzi5AQEC0Qf/ZWcK/ALKua4d+157mOH9Y4pO46zk5DzD
OVmWpia8+J9r4cetbpPMjdmbrRYFRLwQkZOYXLZD
4UmlW2/xWmretMkmfRQIGSdY
fpHHPatat04h1gds444gsswxpptviK+G5+aBb+jI
OF69IDCWugRyDkGFupLLppDr
HafMomLDEYNuFBvBMStLNhG7056FvkdSvXthVWm1
U7Ht4DncmaewI3rCmHVKyzdB
KVB+ijhkaIMC5C18hyDBiISYHqy8qMKbE7u6nTah
9AuaE58tqP11AHH55AOvbb1b
UXUpwCNr80Nj/ rH3veTnAOz55FCThvSmqGcD1Et3OI7MHrYuRrp2N
g==
=QPp9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous via Panta Rhei 2006-06-30, 7:12 pm |
| In article <2BE8EF59E4@bikikii.ath.cx>
BiKiKii Admin <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Anonyma wrote:
>
> Don't think so...
>
> The version of Hachcash (v1.8 ?) supplied with latest source of
> Panta's Reliable v1.0.6rc2 is a version which only verifies hashcash
> version 0 stamps.
No, panta definitely *does* take version 1 stamps. This token:
X-Hashcash: 1:27:060624:panta-rhei::9/GRMaLoh1HOpE5J:G0Ox
(compressed with -Z 1) was minted with hashcash v1.22 and is how this
message got here. Panta probably has upgraded hashcash numerous times on
his servers regardless of which version is included in his minter.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
|
|
|
|