Anonymous Servers - FindNot

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > July 2006 > FindNot





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author FindNot
Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-07-02, 7:13 pm

What a bunch of trolls about findnot, they sent me this reply on June
29th, they probably didn't get a chance to answer everyone all at once.......

---------- Original Message -----------[vbcol=seagreen]
> From: "support" <support@findnot.com>
> To: xxxxxxx@hushmail.com (username snipped)
> Sent: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:04:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: service
>
to log in,[vbcol=seagreen]
inconvenience.[vbcol=seagreen]





Anonyma

2006-07-02, 7:13 pm

Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

> What a bunch of trolls about findnot, they sent me this reply on June
> 29th, they probably didn't get a chance to answer everyone all at
> once.......


ROTFLMAO!

Anyone can forge an email, but you're not even good at it. You left out
a whole shit load of headers. Idiot.

>
> ---------- Original Message -----------

What sort of "technical difficulties" hits 30 servers on a dozen
different providers in a bunch of different locations?

The answer is none. Besides being obvious just by looking at it your
forgery doesn't even make any sense.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> to log in,
> inconvenience.
>
>
>
>
>










traveler 66

2006-07-03, 1:12 am

On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:45:59 -0400 (EDT), Anonyma wrote:

> Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
>
> ROTFLMAO!
>
> Anyone can forge an email, but you're not even good at it. You left out
> a whole shit load of headers. Idiot.


Well, now I know why they didn't say anything about it here, what's the
point? Before, after, or sometime in between, it get's called a fake, lol
Ever think an anonymous user might not want you to see their headers, or
that their headers might not have to much info in them?
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
> What sort of "technical difficulties" hits 30 servers on a dozen
> different providers in a bunch of different locations?
>
> The answer is none. Besides being obvious just by looking at it your
> forgery doesn't even make any sense.
>
Borked Pseudo Mailed

2006-07-03, 1:12 am

traveler 66 wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 19:45:59 -0400 (EDT), Anonyma wrote:
>
>
> Well, now I know why they didn't say anything about it here, what's


They didn't say anything about it ANYWHERE you XXXXwit.










traveler 66

2006-07-03, 1:12 am

On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 21:24:48 -0600 (MDT), Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:

> traveler 66 wrote:
>
>
> They didn't say anything about it ANYWHERE you XXXXwit.


It looks like e-mails were sent out "XXXXwit". But I know, all of them
were faked for your viewing pleasure. Go away someplace.
EggplantŠ

2006-07-10, 1:13 am

>
> Well, now I know why they didn't say anything about it here, what's
> the point? Before, after, or sometime in between, it get's called a
> fake, lol Ever think an anonymous user might not want you to see their
> headers, or that their headers might not have to much info in them?
>


OMFG! Are we talking about FindNot or not?! If they can't keep their own
stuff private when there's still one working server (forget where, and only
one) then they're worthless anyway. They'll get it together again or they
won't. But I won't trust it's not a sting from here. But that's just me. Do
what thou wilt.


<Snip>



.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access[vbcol=seagreen]
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com