| Edward Langenback 2006-07-09, 1:12 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2006-07-08, Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
> andocrates@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> The remailer network is exactly the same, and there's a lot less nodes.
>
> Both the Tor and remailer network designs assume there *will* be nodes
> run by attackers. That's why packets/messages are encrypted multiple
> times before they ever leave the user's machine. No Tor or remailer
> entry node can see contents or destination, and no Tor or remailer exit
> can see the origins of any data. Nodes in the middle can see nothing
> but encrypted goop flowing in all different directions.
"Encrypted Goop" *cackle* I love these new technical terms. Seriously
though, 'trust' is not something that remailer network uses and I rather
doubt that Tor puts much stock in it either. Freenet even less.
> The remailer network is a bit more hardened because it allows longer
> chains and adds latency, but they're both truly anonymous systems.
- --
apostle AT peculiar.homeip.net Encrypted email only @ this address
key-id: 0x72A69CD5 or 0x84D46604 Non-encrypted mail deleted unread.
http://peculiarplace.com/mixminion-message-sender/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
iQEVAwUBRLAbI3V+YnyE1GYEAQKLnwgAq45dUDUV
vJlR1sWyl9sGnfDyjTRfpvVn
KWzlxC/Y+lpAhGxnPey9jS7/ p1EvlCzuVd7O+KRHrDhAnEcJad5gMF+SIXsGAJdi
2QJEp4MEsUuhcPeUDC7aEONmVNZmHKLQA2axIcos
0ta8vGjmssumDSHXAEChJ8gJ
qq++/lQROy7kGJ1kBcAhej7p/gGst0Eb53oGA9XWyicbVA34XSyUDI/2lUSCcdJE
trtawZQ98bi+QtTmL8ahJa+0tCl6aE90i5XHr9zx
u6nKVNlua2fSXLzYvpj9Cx2h
JJFxmptjpvSrOdmSproQd5Aet04XSJLzv6EF1X5U
JWyhLQVINKJw8Q==
=ETja
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|