Anonymous Servers - Re: www.findnot.com

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > July 2006 > Re: www.findnot.com





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: www.findnot.com
traveler 66

2006-07-09, 1:12 am

On Sat, 8 Jul 2006 14:55:31 -0400 (EDT), Anonyma wrote:

> Path: news.privacy.li!dartmaster!s02-b18.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!204.153.245.137.MISMATCH!pink.octanews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octanews.net!mauve.octanews.net!statler.nntpserver.com!be5.nntpserver.com!not-for-mail
> From: Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca>
> Subject: Re: www.findnot.com
> Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
> X-Mail2News-Contact: mail2newscontact at nerdshack dot com
> Organization: Mail2news - This message came by way of a mail2news service. If something is of great concern, please contact the mail2news operator.
> References: < ebce89080ce0629c73cbbf7b08e1f51d@mixmast
er.it> <DJR4W33U38906.4478009259@twistycreek.com> <1152377016.208361.251390@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
> Message-ID: <e6413e27ddf58a7498623eed2ade41ad@deuxpi.ca>
> Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 14:55:31 -0400 (EDT)
> Lines: 18
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 08 Jul 2006 18:00:48 GMT
> X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
> Xref: news.privacy.li alt.privacy:106537 alt.privacy.anon-server:318691
>
> andocrates@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> The remailer network is exactly the same, and there's a lot less nodes.
>
> Both the Tor and remailer network designs assume there *will* be nodes
> run by attackers. That's why packets/messages are encrypted multiple
> times before they ever leave the user's machine. No Tor or remailer
> entry node can see contents or destination, and no Tor or remailer exit
> can see the origins of any data. Nodes in the middle can see nothing
> but encrypted goop flowing in all different directions.
>
> The remailer network is a bit more hardened because it allows longer
> chains and adds latency, but they're both truly anonymous systems.


Don't forget one thing about the Tor network, it tells you right on their
site not to rely on it if you need strong anonymity, and they just put out
a major upgrade with bug fixes. Having said that, it's still turning out
to be a great privacy tool, and looks like it's only going to get better.
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com