| Simpleton 2006-07-31, 7:13 am |
| In article <de8802d678e0e669aa207adf5c001be8@dizum.com>
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> I've been holding my tongue, but enough is enough. The bashing cotse is
> taking in here is completely undeserved. It is quite obviously the
> result of a jealous individual who runs a competing service.
>
> I use cotse for many things, first and foremost is the e-mail service.
> There is no one else that even comes close to cotse's e-mail. The
> flexibility is amazing, the unlimited addresses awesome, and the
> anti-spam features perfect. I like the fact I can choose from many
> different domains and even use my own (every one of my domains e-mail is
> now handled by cotse. I just transferred the last one last week). I
> like being able to redirect important e-mail to my phone or another
> account. I like the automatically expiring addresses. I like that no
> matter what I want to do with my e-mail there is some way for me to do
> it. If you've liked anything that cotse has developed and released,
> like news2remail, just picture that ingenuity focused on e-mail, the
> result is nothing short of incredible. As an e-mail service alone and
> even if it was not a privacy service it would be well worth the money.
>
> I also use cotse's SSH and proxies. I find them very useful. I know at
> this point some one is going to say "enjoy being logged", but I've read
> the page on cotse about it. Privacy.li is twisting things in an attempt
> to detract from them. Cotse does not log the content of anything.
> Their logs are security and performance related. They do not contain
> anything that identifies me with where I went. I think privacy.li is
> counting on those who know little and won't read or understand the
> details posted. I mentioned to Steve that he should rewrite it to be
> less technical and focus more on how they don't log anything user
> related. He didn't seem to think anything was wrong with the way he
> descibed it, I disagree, I think it allows people like privacy.li to
> twist it knowing it's too technical for most to understand.
>
I personally think that all the anti-cotse, pro privacy.li
threads were started by someone that doesn't work for either
one. I think it's a troll that started it just for shits and
giggles, and all the morons got suckered right into the
infighting, sticking up for one or the other.
When things are slow, and there's no animosity in the groups,
I'll bet it happens again; someone will start an anti-cotse or
anti-privacy.li thread, and sit back and watch all the drama.
|