| TwistyCreek 2006-07-31, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
>
> This logging policy is deceiving and open to a cotse interpretation, they
You mean like the "interpretation" that Adminus using his logs to track
down visitors isn't really "logging"?
ROTFL!
> can co-relate your web activity with the logs they keep. They aren't
WTF is "co-relate" you illiterate buffoon? Do you me correlate? So
you're trying to say Cotse can "correlate" your activity with they logs
they admit keeping? But Privacy.LIE can't with the logs they claimed
not to keep but got caught red handed actually USING?
Your "logic" is almost as consistent as it is dull witted. But it makes
for an easy target anyway. 
> saying that are they, your lies to ppl are getting exposed my friend. Did
What lies? What has been exposed?
Nothing Cotse has said or done, that's for sure. And chanting "is too"
over and over won't change it. the only ones getting exposed here are
the snake oil services who make promises they can never keep. the
miscreants who liek to their customers, and the idiots who are too
damned blind or stupid to not see it, and make the mistake of repeating
the lies.
> you think it was me with the spam? You're wrong. If I have a comment to
> make about your logging I'll make it with my own handle, unlike you and
> your trolls. And the fact is that cotse logs, period.
So does Privacy.LIE, Twitlight, and all the rest. Some are honest
about it, some aren't, and some have already been busted on their
dishonesty. And if the others make a single slip they'll be nailed to
the cross along side the ones that have already been exposed.
Get use to the idea.
|