Anonymous Servers - Re: Pinging Ken Pangborn

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > August 2006 > Re: Pinging Ken Pangborn





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Pinging Ken Pangborn
\(krp\)

2006-08-24, 7:12 pm


"Borked Pseudo Mailed" <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:b9152264511a18bcd8a64d7a9d99b419@ps
eudo.borked.net...

> Actually you said the following in e-mail to me:
>
> "Okay Rich - let's see. You can contact Detective Dan Toomey of the city
> of
> Bolingbrook, Illinois police department. He's ONE of the detectives in
> several jurisdictions working on the Moore situation. There have been
> several detectives from the Pinellas County Sheriff's department who have
> worked the case as well. I am not free to pass out their names. But Toomey
> has worked the case with Moore for years. He can confirm *****some*****
> things to you." (emphasis mine on the "some")


WHAT did I say? Did I say he will confirm EVERY detail of ALL of it to you
XXXXXXX? He might have confirmed that there was an "INVESTIGATION" not the
DETAILS you demanded. Not especially the way you worded your inquiries. You
chose your wording in your e-mails to them as carefully as you choose them
here. You wanted to provoke a negative response and got your wish - they
wrote you off as an Internet Kook and ignored you.





Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com