| Author |
Tor/Google Groups?
|
|
| TwistyCreek 2006-08-26, 7:15 am |
| Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
and almost as anon.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-08-26, 1:12 pm |
| TwistyCreek wrote:
> Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
> and almost as anon.
Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
those.
Side note: The FoxyProxy extension looks very appealing at first
glance, but I believe it would be a bad thing. Setting individual sites
to be anonymized or not completely ignores things like hot linking that
cause your browser to look to another site for some of the page
content. You could be outed by visiting a page that called content from
a site that wasn't in your list. 
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-08-26, 7:13 pm |
| > Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
> around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
> as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
> content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
> those.
I use Tor + Privoxy via Firefox, and I turn off Java, and also
set Firefox to delete data, cookies etc after shutdown.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-08-26, 7:13 pm |
| On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 20:16:26 +0000, TwistyCreek wrote:
>
> I use Tor + Privoxy via Firefox, and I turn off Java, and also set Firefox
> to delete data, cookies etc after shutdown.
You need to turn off javascript as well.
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The
> original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is
> unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other than
> alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for abuse
> and hashcash info.
| |
| Anonymous via Panta Rhei 2006-08-27, 1:13 pm |
| > >> Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
>
> You need to turn off javascript as well.
or use the noscript extension for selective control:
http://www.noscript.net/whats
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-08-27, 7:13 pm |
| > or use the noscript extension for selective control:
>
> http://www.noscript.net/whats
I was about to install the plugin when I noticed
it's unsigned.
| |
| Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer 2006-08-27, 7:13 pm |
| On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:43:10 +0000, TwistyCreek wrote:
>
> I was about to install the plugin when I noticed it's unsigned.
I have never installed anything that was signed and never have problems.
| |
|
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote in
news:P1TVOBT238956.6549768519@twistycreek.com:
>
> I was about to install the plugin when I noticed
> it's unsigned.
The problem there is that I've never seen a *signed* Firefox / Mozilla
plugin...
- --
http://blog.peculiarplace.com
http://lurasbookcase.com
http://purrfectdomains.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQEVAwUBRPI7NHV+YnyE1GYEAQLh8ggAn7aDuoVH
X10IR8Mgt66lBGU0laUOQOtC
pEz4AqYEkWas/Ynt/MDk1c9bpBC+4mXcA/V8fcXXgCQeWkv1cup6qD7qKKAGuCwe
Zmxgy3qLP4Q6IH9qxhy/ FXjRoyFI07I76DqnOwiF5vlM9MWztB2Hz4mDDMSt
vLb8
e3IvMwyj6r7PYHoIK74OeddQggzFoQNUNO4NUchD
Jt71ljfCYYIB4YPZyKOOwFX4
POSVMYQ14I0TwVzz16w5PXooibpcAtnlOUmy1Zc+
lailNdsS02OZPV7p3JhaNa0o
G988KSRceFd/sKlpgkHNf/BddFPIo/+ajsw41BT8mMeVM7uWXh9LyA==
=f2W4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous 2006-08-28, 7:13 am |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
> Yes, but be sure your browser wears protection any time it's poking
> around in Google. Or anywhere really. Turn off or filter as much crap
> as you can using your browser's settings, use Privoxy or some other
> content scrubber, or read up regarding the Firefox extensions and use
> those.
Clear cookies frequently.
> Side note: The FoxyProxy extension looks very appealing at first
> glance, but I believe it would be a bad thing. Setting individual sites
> to be anonymized or not completely ignores things like hot linking
> that
and third-party cookies
> cause your browser to look to another site for some of the page
> content. You could be outed by visiting a page that called content from
> a site that wasn't in your list.
and other sneaky things too, I'm sure!
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-08-28, 1:16 pm |
| > Seems like a lot less hassle than Stunnel-Tor-Socks-JBN
> and almost as anon.
Would this system apply to setting up an anonymous blog?
I'd like to blog but I need pretty assured anonymity.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-08-28, 1:16 pm |
| In article < d9d72254304c3329bb5c02513dad42eb@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
> Would this system apply to setting up an anonymous blog?
> I'd like to blog but I need pretty assured anonymity.
This blog is anonymous if you email your postings to it via a remailer.
http://apa-s.blogspot.com/
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-08-28, 1:16 pm |
| On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:59:26 +0200, George Orwell wrote:
>
> Would this system apply to setting up an anonymous blog? I'd like to blog
> but I need pretty assured anonymity.
See http://www.eelbash.org/blogs.
| |
| Anonymous 2006-08-28, 7:13 pm |
| On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>Would this system apply to setting up an anonymous blog?
>I'd like to blog but I need pretty assured anonymity.
>
>.
check out http://www.eelbash.org/blogs
100% fully anonymous blogging
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-08-30, 1:14 pm |
| > This blog is anonymous if you email your postings to it via a remailer.
> http://apa-s.blogspot.com/
How exactly do you post a message to apa-s.blogspot?
What 'To:' header do you use?
| |
| George Orwell 2006-08-30, 1:14 pm |
| In article < 54e43567a45eb9425dfdd145982c1fc1@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>
>
> How exactly do you post a message to apa-s.blogspot?
> What 'To:' header do you use?
apasblog.apasblog
at
blogger.com
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2006-08-30, 1:14 pm |
| On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:45:11 +0200, George Orwell wrote:
>
> How exactly do you post a message to apa-s.blogspot?
> What 'To:' header do you use?
It doesn't make sense to use it, if it can even be used, when
http://www.eelbash.org/blogs is available. The eelbash blog works the same
way invisiblog did, is simple to use, and your blogs are completely
untraceable.
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-08-30, 7:13 pm |
| In article < 72e8d3e74c5c58ed26c9da0a926954d4@remaile
r.cyberiade.it>
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:45:11 +0200, George Orwell wrote:
>
>
> It doesn't make sense to use it, if it can even be used, when
> http://www.eelbash.org/blogs is available.
This assumes you trust eelbash.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-08-30, 7:13 pm |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> In article < 72e8d3e74c5c58ed26c9da0a926954d4@remaile
r.cyberiade.it>
> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
>
> This assumes you trust eelbash.
I refuse to use ANY Eeltard services on principal, even if they can be
used safely. It would be like patronizing a business owned by a child
molester just because you're over 18.
No way. No how. Never.
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2006-08-30, 7:13 pm |
| On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:18:17 -0600, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> In article < 72e8d3e74c5c58ed26c9da0a926954d4@remaile
r.cyberiade.it>
> Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
>
> This assumes you trust eelbash.
The nice thing is that it does not assume that. You don't have to trust
anybody. Just use the remailer system and you can post your blog entries
and nobody will know who posted them.
If you want to read them or even go to the site you should use tor. I know
I would.
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-08-31, 1:16 am |
| On 31 Aug 2006, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
<anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:18:17 -0600, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
>
>
>The nice thing is that it does not assume that. You don't have to trust
>anybody. Just use the remailer system and you can post your blog entries
>and nobody will know who posted them.
>
>If you want to read them or even go to the site you should use tor. I know
>I would.
... and turn off cookies, java, javascript, flash, Etc. Etc.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-08-31, 1:16 am |
| > How exactly do you post a message to apa-s.blogspot?
> What 'To:' header do you use?
You can set up an anonymous blog on your own.
*Set up Tor/Privoxy.
*Set up a throwaway email account.
*Register on Blogger.
*Use your email account to post blogs.
This will be anonymous and mostly untraceable.
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-08-31, 7:14 am |
| On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>You can set up an anonymous blog on your own.
>
>*Set up Tor/Privoxy.
>*Set up a throwaway email account.
>*Register on Blogger.
>*Use your email account to post blogs.
>
>This will be anonymous and mostly untraceable.
>
>.
Sorry. "Mostly untraceable" is not good enough.
| |
| George Orwell 2006-08-31, 7:14 am |
| > Sorry. "Mostly untraceable" is not good enough.
So why are you posting through remailers?
You have no absolute proof that remailer
messages cannot be traced, therefore your
comment is bogus.
|
|
|
|