Anonymous Servers - Which Remailers Still Working?

Author

Which Remailers Still Working?

DrFaustus

2006-08-13, 1:12 pm

QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.
It seems that the better ones such as twisty and frell are now, for
some reason, out of service.

Readers, kindly post to ng, those few remailers that are still
working, especially those that permit "From".
TIA

John

2006-08-13, 1:12 pm

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:09:15 GMT, DrFaustus
<DrFaustus@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:

>QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.

btw, isn't this a matter of updating the mixmaster files type2.list,
pubring.mix, mlist.txt and rlist.txt?

E.Nigma

2006-08-13, 1:12 pm

In article <2jcud2dkom6q12rl7ihaa9l8iu853psglc@4ax.com>
DrFaustus <DrFaustus@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
|
| QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.
| It seems that the better ones such as twisty and frell are now, for
| some reason, out of service.
|
| Readers, kindly post to ng, those few remailers that are still
| working, especially those that permit "From".
| TIA

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

What, might I ask, has QS got to do with remailers not working? My
QS is working quite well and has nothing to do with whether the
remailers are working or not. Remailers metacola, twisty, dingo, and
quite a few used in random chains are working just fine. The time is
a little lengthy due to latent-time, but all in all I have had no
problem with QS or the working remailers.

E.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3

iQEVAwUBRN9TGNAqdZr/ mrO9AQEhaQf8Cii5eknI1fO8vT1v02LjcVpBj29z
Zayl
j80/uIoQ+E1AISdtI/0RnDi/0/NsE6MIc495asqy++SZSrP0G1FE/GDX2xLBt+hA
O0QpJPhsiVFrKHHTn2EYNdfBPxnyI8ZR6Mkn3u5s
7jCOYLzmLGNdrLxnQVp6/Haw
BrsbZBf0bjr+vPkAFP4poV/ i2wOlFCzA9aV8xWj+LtWklwtv3mcPPqoCqSXCPKJ
v
NenvmGy0U21okBGKsLxAzSjisFzGnOnsD+bxUHcl
zBq46NN2GcC71sYvdHbe62h8
4LQBsRC24noZ6pWgNOI1/vkr7UI+pgWu/jE026I23Yd3zc0+99Bgcg==
=F/4S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

TwistyCreek

2006-08-13, 1:12 pm

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 16:42:26 +0000, E.Nigma wrote:

> In article <2jcud2dkom6q12rl7ihaa9l8iu853psglc@4ax.com>
> DrFaustus <DrFaustus@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
> |
> | QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.
> | It seems that the better ones such as twisty and frell are now, for
> | some reason, out of service.
> |
> | Readers, kindly post to ng, those few remailers that are still
> | working, especially those that permit "From".
> | TIA
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> What, might I ask, has QS got to do with remailers not working? My
> QS is working quite well and has nothing to do with whether the
> remailers are working or not. Remailers metacola, twisty, dingo, and
> quite a few used in random chains are working just fine. The time is
> a little lengthy due to latent-time, but all in all I have had no
> problem with QS or the working remailers.
>
> E.

I just ran a test using the following exit remailers, and the
three m2n gateways below.

All messages made it through the remailers and at least two of
the gateways.

The dizum gateway may have a problem, because the messages going
through austria, eelbash, cripto and metacolo did not make it
through dizum, although they did through the other two gateways.

All in all, it looks like the remailers are back to normal.

austria
banana
bigapple
borked
cripto
cyberiad
deuxpi
dizum
eelbash
george
hastio
metacolo
panta
paranoia
pboxmix
tonga
twisty

mail2news@dizum.com
mail2news@newsanon.org
mail2news@m2n.mixmin.net

George Orwell

2006-08-13, 7:21 pm

In article <2jcud2dkom6q12rl7ihaa9l8iu853psglc@4ax.com>
DrFaustus <DrFaustus@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.

I use QS everyday without a problem. I just keep up with the news here
of which remailers are having a problem and "bar" them until I see news
that they are straightened out again.

Zax

2006-08-14, 7:16 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 01:25:05 +0200 (CEST), George Orwell wrote in
Message-Id: < ce98ebb2ce8ae529be652b22cb3cd496@mixmast
er.it>:

> I use QS everyday without a problem. I just keep up with the news here
> of which remailers are having a problem and "bar" them until I see news
> that they are straightened out again.

Nothing wrong with doing that, but the system should do it for you if
you are maintaining regular stats. Are your MINREL and RELFINAL
parameters set to reasonable values?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBROBHDGoLu9HNUqmMAQoHYwf/XzwZcrskZqaExjhxtAt5GtHJb9YcnXVE
L8ahhUCDQqsitcWBFNHudE3X9YUzgzRRQCWsaghb
ihs6+IT0JpBggUwKSsom8VB4
AbvoJceJtbnDBtacChkrNW/ AqchqWfDdZ4lEKZrIPHUTqIWC5f7S7aFADYn3z1R
E
7ss94zkeLDRAaqTIXQR+NOBYDuphYojc2SI6MlqY
ylNMUJObY4ZgkmnzFjzXsmQN
K5xUmpSv7d5U8uMWMxjDt9BX8modINLH7EGRP/bOlhG9S2lQixuY9SjHg69bPskv
fKt2v3BLkO0WTlFHCMMaNMHBS5jRZPE4Jevc9Kuh
GEIMdC+kAwWtbQ==
=JvaK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
pub 1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>

Anonymous via Panta Rhei

2006-09-05, 1:13 am

In article <2jcud2dkom6q12rl7ihaa9l8iu853psglc@4ax.com>
DrFaustus <DrFaustus@roc.usenetexchange.com> wrote:
>
> QS is almost unusable now, with so many remailers non-functioning.
> It seems that the better ones such as twisty and frell are now, for
> some reason, out of service.
>
> Readers, kindly post to ng, those few remailers that are still
> working, especially those that permit "From".
> TIA

Panta's working.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.