| Author |
dont make me laugh
|
|
| Nomen Nescio 2006-08-31, 1:15 pm |
| network noodles wrote:
"You little punk, I won't even waste the effort of backtracing you through the network."
Because this dickhead supposedly works for an ISP he thinks he can 'backtrace' my posts. What a ignorant sap. I bet he is just a body that answers the phones and does customer service. But he is trying to make out that he is some kind of technical whizz.
XXXXing gook.
You got a real chip on your shoulder, you little XXXXing prick.
| |
| network_noadle 2006-08-31, 1:15 pm |
|
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> network noodles wrote:
>
> "You little punk, I won't even waste the effort of backtracing you through the network."
Learn to quote properly.
I didn't write that.
> Because this dickhead supposedly works for an ISP he thinks he can 'backtrace' my posts.
No, I said I wasn't going to waste the effort trying.
> What a ignorant sap.
About many things. Just like everyone else. Knowing the limits of
your own knowledge and knowing when to say 'I don't know' is a key
skill in building a reputation as someone who knows what he knows, and
isn't afraid to admit to not being omniscient.
> I bet he is just a body that answers the phones and does customer service.
Nope, never did that. Just network geeking and other customer facing
application development.
Oh, and diagnosing major outages in the service provisioning systems.
(Usually a static data glitch in the database.)
> But he is trying to make out that he is some kind of technical whizz.
Only after you're selective editing and resinning of what I actually
wrote.
> XXXXing gook.
What makes you think I'm a sexy Vietnamese? Oh, you're calling me
names. Well, that really advances your argument.
Argument? What am I saying. You're just an abuse generator shell
script, aren't you?
> You got a real chip on your shoulder, you little XXXXing prick.
Penis envy. How mature.
network_noadle
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2006-08-31, 1:15 pm |
| "network_noadle" <william.noad@UK.IBM.com> wrote:
>
> No, I said I wasn't going to waste the effort trying.
A cheesy way of trying to tap dance around your threats to trace
someone through the remailer network. Obviously you know you can't,
but you threaten it anyway. Which makes this statement nothing but
empty rhetoric......
> About many things. Just like everyone else. Knowing the limits of
> your own knowledge and knowing when to say 'I don't know' is a key
> skill in building a reputation as someone who knows what he knows, and
> isn't afraid to admit to not being omniscient.
How quaint. Ranting on the ethics of admitting your limitations, after
claiming to be able to perform tasks nobody else on earth can but not
being "motivated" enough to bother with it.
What a laughable hypocrite you are.
| |
| network_noadle 2006-08-31, 1:15 pm |
|
Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> "network_noadle" <william.noad@UK.IBM.com> wrote:
>
>
> A cheesy way of trying to tap dance around your threats to trace
> someone through the remailer network.
Once again you are deliberately misinterpreting what I said. There
never was a threat to trace you. I know that its a WOMBAT trying to
backtrace through a remailer network, so I'm not going to waste the
effort trying. That's all I said. How did you construe that as a
threat to carry out the impossible?
You are selectively misquoting and misinterpreting simple statements of
fact. That in itself weakens any argument you might be making.
> Obviously you know you can't,
> but you threaten it anyway. Which makes this statement nothing but
> empty rhetoric......
Having established a false premise, you use it to belittle me.
Unsuccessfully, since the premise was clearly false.
Attacking an argument ad hominem is (in most cases) indication that the
attacker has nothing to back their own position, and is instead
attempting disprove my position by discrediting me.
> How quaint. Ranting on the ethics of admitting your limitations, after
> claiming to be able to perform tasks nobody else on earth can but not
> being "motivated" enough to bother with it.
Once again you use the false premise you established (or rather failed
to establish), this time to claim I am exagerating my own abilities,
which I didn't.
> What a laughable hypocrite you are.
Your conclusion, based on your false premises is, clearly untrue.
The case for the defence rests.
network_noadle
| |
| erewhon 2006-08-31, 7:19 pm |
|
>
> What makes you think I'm a sexy Vietnamese?
Do you think he meant 'Spook'?
I have no desire to think of you as 'sexy Vietnamese'!
| |
| network_noadle 2006-08-31, 7:19 pm |
|
erewhon wrote:
> Do you think he meant 'Spook'?
Doubt it. I've never worked for the security services and I'm still
breathing.
> I have no desire to think of you as 'sexy Vietnamese'!
I'd be more concerned if you admitted to harbouring such a desire, but
that's just me.
network_noadle
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-09-01, 1:16 am |
| On 31 Aug 2006, "network_noadle" <william.noad@UK.IBM.com> wrote:
>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>Learn to quote properly.
>I didn't write that.
>
>
>No, I said I wasn't going to waste the effort trying.
please, try. I'd like to see the results.
| |
| SubKool_Ntrance 2006-09-01, 1:15 pm |
|
network_noadle wrote:
> Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
<snip>
> Your conclusion, based on your false premises is, clearly untrue.
>
> The case for the defence rests.
>
> network_noadle
>
Noadle, dont feed the fools lol.
David
| |
| network_noadle 2006-09-01, 1:15 pm |
| SubKool_Ntrance wrote:
> Noadle, dont feed the fools lol.
>
> David
It's been a while, don't spoil my fun!
network_noadle
| |
| SubKool_Ntrance 2006-09-01, 1:15 pm |
|
network_noadle wrote:
> SubKool_Ntrance wrote:
>
>
> It's been a while, don't spoil my fun!
>
> network_noadle
*They* dont change lol. Same foolish monkeys, same poo-fiend idiot
arguments started over nothing. But, by all means, throw them a leg lol.
David
| |
| network_noadle 2006-09-03, 7:15 pm |
| SubKool_Ntrance wrote:
> *They* dont change lol. Same foolish monkeys, same poo-fiend idiot
> arguments started over nothing. But, by all means, throw them a leg lol.
Oh well. I'll soon get bored with baiting this specific troll, he's
not interesting enough.
network_noadle
| |
|
|
>A cheesy way of trying to tap dance around your threats to trace
>someone through the remailer network. Obviously you know you can't,
>but you threaten it anyway. Which makes this statement nothing but
>empty rhetoric......
You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
an hour or several days but it can be traced.
EZoto
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-09-03, 7:15 pm |
| On Sun, 03 Sep 2006, EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
>just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
>an hour or several days but it can be traced.
>
>EZoto
That's bullshit. You are just one of those useful idiots the govenrments of
the world love so much. You believe they can do the impossible, just
because they are "the government".
You really should educate yourself a little more before shooting off your
mouth. But that's just not the way they do it in New Jersey, is it? All
mouth.
| |
|
|
Like I said. What's your excuse.
EZoto
| |
| George Orwell 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| EZoto wrote:
>
>
> You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
> just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
> an hour or several days but it can be traced.
ROTFLMAO!
Got any bridges for sale?
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| EZoto wrote:
> You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
> just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
> an hour or several days but it can be traced.
, ,
|\ /|
\ `-.\ \/ /.-' /
\_ / \ _/
__.--/ __ __ \--.__
`\__.| (. .) |.__/`
| /\ | ___ )
\ | | / ___ /,--.\ ( )
|_/ \_|.......---''`` ``-./ | \\___//
/ \ ` | '---'
\ ^ ^ / \
\ .-''-._/ |
'``''`` / |
| | \
| \ | |
\ \ \ \ |
`._\ / _\ /
\ \ /'''-------\ '-. \
\ \ | / / \ | ( )
( ( | / ' | | ( ) (
| | | / / | | ) _ )
| | | _/ .` / / ( \_
_| _| | / ( _/ / _(_\ \)_
/ / ( ---` / ( (____\___)
---|___\ |___\
| |
| Anonymous Remailer (austria) 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
|
In article <0rnmf21t0kbi3v7intc8ivj88153m74nep@4ax.com>
EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
> just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
> an hour or several days but it can be traced.
>
> EZoto
BWAHAHA!
God how I love Usenet!
| |
|
|
Well, well, well. If you just post the right thing you can bring all
the trolls out in one herd. All you trolls look like pidgeons all
coming for the bread.
LOL
EZoto
| |
| Anonymous 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| In article <povmf2h6r14kq5fuonman74gia6aog8org@4ax.com>
EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Well, well, well. If you just post the right thing you can bring all
> the trolls out in one herd. All you trolls look like pidgeons all
> coming for the bread.
>
> LOL
>
> EZoto
I assume bread = your stupidity.
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| EZoto wrote:
>
> Well, well, well. If you just post the right thing you can bring all
> the trolls out in one herd. All you trolls look like pidgeons all
> coming for the bread.
You might have gotten away with this "just trollin'" ploy, if you hadn't
been trying to defend your glaring ignorance since 2003.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
> In article <0rnmf21t0kbi3v7intc8ivj88153m74nep@4ax.com>
> EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Lack of clue noted.
This "Ezoto" character has made the same claim for years now. Of course
just like every other blow hard he can't seem to even describe how to
get the job done never mind actually demonstrate. There's always just
"ways to do it". *laugh*
| |
| TwistyCreek 2006-09-04, 1:13 am |
| On Sun, 03 Sep 2006, EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>You know you can be traced no matter what remailer you use. That is
>just a myth. The problem is the time spent in doing it. It can take
>an hour or several days but it can be traced.
>
>EZoto
Please. I would LOVE to see a demonstration of your ability to trace
remailer messages to their origin.
Feel free to demonstrate by tracing this message, posted as a followup to
your <0rnmf21t0kbi3v7intc8ivj88153m74nep@4ax.com> via a chain of three
anonymous remailers.
When your trace is successfull, please give me a phone call and let me
know.
I'll be waiting.
| |
| network_noadle 2006-09-04, 7:13 am |
| EZoto wrote:
> Well, well, well. If you just post the right thing you can bring all
> the trolls out in one herd. All you trolls look like pidgeons all
> coming for the bread.
>
> LOL
Nicely done.
network_noadle
| |
| Frosty 2006-09-04, 1:13 pm |
| As the sun rose on Mon, 4 Sep 2006 03:11:10 +0200 (CEST), the
distinguished and oh so talented "Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
<mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> climbed up to the podium, shuffled
some papers, took a sip of ice water and shouted in a loud voice:
>
>In article <0rnmf21t0kbi3v7intc8ivj88153m74nep@4ax.com>
>EZoto <xeuclidesx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>BWAHAHA!
>God how I love Usenet!
Shit!
I'll bet dude can't even trace me!
--
Si hoc signum legere potes, operis boni in rebus Latinus alacribus et fructuosis potiri potes!
|
|
|
|