|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > October 2007 > Pedophile Clown Arrested With "Evidence Eliminator" on his laptop
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Pedophile Clown Arrested With "Evidence Eliminator" on his laptop
|
|
| Nomen Nescio 2007-10-11, 1:13 am |
| Springfield man, a former cop and clown, faces child-porn charges
Oct 10, 2007 @ 09:30 AM
By Sarah Antonacci
GATEHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
SPRINGFIELD -
http://www.rrstar.com/homepage/x368603386
A Springfield man who has been a clown, magician, police officer,
minister, youth counselor and Big Brother volunteer was arrested Tuesday
on charges of sex tourism and possessing child pornography.
A. Paul Carlock Jr., 57, of the 2300 block of Hedge Lane was arrested in
Springfield after an investigation sparked by immigration and Homeland
Security officers in June upon his return to the United States from a
trip to the Philippines.
According to an affidavit filed in federal court, Carlock was stopped at
the San Francisco airport June 12 after returning from the Philippines.
At the airport, Carlock reportedly told immigration officers he had been
working as a clown at the House of Joy orphanage in San Isidro, a city
in the Philippines.
Because he was traveling from a country considered to be high-risk for
child sex tourism and he had direct contact with children, the officers
asked to look at Carlocks digital camera and his computer. When they
searched the computers, they said they found numerous pictures of nude
young boys.
The boys were depicted playing, showering, and sitting clothed but with
their genitals visible. Some were posing, while others did not seem to
be aware they were being photographed, the affidavit stated.
When boys at House of Joy were interviewed in the Philippines in
September, three boys indicated they had been asleep and awakened to
find Carlock fondling them.
Carlock initially told investigating officers that the images on his
computer and camera were photos he had intended to edit so theyd be
appropriate to show at his church. He said the photos showed that the
boys were too poor to afford clothes and that he photographed the naked
boys because thats how they live, the affidavit said.
However, officials found one image marked as "edited," in which the only
change was that the edited version had been enlarged, according to the
affidavit.
Officials also allegedly discovered a program on Carlocks computer
called Evidence Eliminator, which authorities said is marketed as
being able to erase images from computers to the extent that
investigators cannot retrieve them. Carlock reportedly said he used
Evidence Eliminator on the advice of a co-worker who said it could be
used to clean out files he no longer uses.
A search warrant executed at Carlocks Springfield home Sept. 28 found
at least 21 other child pornographic movies, the affidavit said.
Carlock reportedly told investigators he had traveled to House of Joy
before and that he also had visited an orphanage in Mexico in 2002,
where he clowned in order to cheer up orphans.
A Web site indicates Carlock and his wife go by the names of Klutzo
and Smilee when performing as clowns and that they have been in the
clowning business for at least 10 years.
The site says the couple provides the very best in family
entertainment and that vacation Bible schools, Sunday school emphasis,
and childrens church are our specialty.
Paul Carlock also performs as Professor Paul the Magician, according
to the affidavit.
Federal authorities said Carlock spent more than 20 years in law
enforcement. His resume reportedly includes: three years as a juvenile
counselor with the Illinois Department of Corrections; six years as a
trainer with the Illinois Department of Corrections; six years as a
Springfield police officer, including four as a youth division
detective; six years with the Illinois Department of Revenue; four years
with the Illinois Department of Public Health in the child health
division; and a period as a Grandview police officer, including several
years as that departments juvenile officer.
Carlock also is an ordained minister, originally with the Church of
Nazarene and currently with the Missionary Church International.
Carlock also volunteered with Big Brothers/Big Sisters for about two
months before he came under investigation. The 6-year-old boy assigned
as Carlocks Little Brother reportedly told police Carlock had never
touched him, but that Carlock had given him two movies one of the two
of them fishing together and a second that showed naked pictures of boys
and girls. Investigators retrieved the DVDs, the affidavit said.
Denise Corcoran-Schainker of Big Brothers/Big Sisters said the
organization carefully checks the backgrounds of adult volunteers.
We run three background checks on all of our volunteers, and all of his
background checks cleared, she said. We do all we can to make sure a
childs safety is never jeopardized. We were fortunate the feds became
involved in such an early time frame.
In December 1986, Carlock wrote a letter to the State Journal-Register
complaining about a cartoon. In the letter, he said he was a
conservative Christian and not ashamed of the fact.
I am not in favor of censorship, but do feel that far too much smut
has been poured into the minds of Americans by all forms of media, he
wrote.
I have spent the past 16 years in law enforcement and related
professions. I have spoken with victims and offenders and have read many
case histories in which pornographic materials played an overwhelming
role in the events that have left lives shattered and homes broken.
Later in the letter, he wrote: Why is it so unreasonable to assume the
government has the right to protect the public from the harmful effects
of pornography (especially in light of the vast amounts of evidence to
support this claim)?
Carlock told investigators that his children are grown and said in court
Tuesday that his wife had filed for divorce earlier that day. Sangamon
County court records could not be accessed to verify that.
Sarah Antonacci can be reached at 217-788-1529 or sarah.antonacci@sj-r.com.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-10-11, 1:14 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Nomen Nescio schreef:
[snip]
> Officials also allegedly discovered a program on Carlockâs computer
> called âEvidence Eliminator,â which authorities said is marketed as
> being able to erase images from computers to the extent that
> investigators cannot retrieve them. Carlock reportedly said he used
> Evidence Eliminator on the advice of a co-worker who said it could be
> used to clean out files he no longer uses.
He should have used "Pedo Protector" instead. It is much better than
Evidence Eliminator and produces higher quality images that thwart
tempest attacks.
That said, it is really sad that pedophiles act out their fantasies.
hi,
Thomas
- --
A society with suicide bombers
is a polite society
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRw4gjQEP2l8iXKAJAQE12AMgkmjvX/hinaQzJfBukndoOz+E3xSRiBF4
2FnHTdLSbaWlsf07PZKBj97tQe94fBxTw8hDcab0
A6i9QhPz0cv3inZj9wIm8J0M
kT7ylJiC/b9wTNupYqzzkc592QzbcgkO6kHovg==
=B0g9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-11, 7:13 pm |
| Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Springfield man, a former cop and clown, faces child-porn charges
> Officials also allegedly discovered a program on Carlock's computer
> called "Evidence Eliminator"....
That should make the privacy.LIE XXXXwits REAL proud since they're
still scamming and spamming for that piece of shit program.
Maybe the sick XXXX that got busted was one of their customers as a
matter of fact...
Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Bytes: 186644
Lines: 1434
Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels, www.privacy.li
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-12, 1:16 am |
| Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in
news:1e26a4f3c0d6f78d7c72e477f1a37795@re
mailer.metacolo.com:
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>
>
> That should make the privacy.LIE XXXXwits REAL proud since they're
> still scamming and spamming for that piece of shit program.
>
> Maybe the sick XXXX that got busted was one of their customers as a
> matter of fact...
>
> Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg"
> yEnc (1/1) From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
> Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
> Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
> Bytes: 186644
> Lines: 1434
> Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels,
> www.privacy.li Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
> Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
> X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST
> www.CosmicWolf.com) X-No-Archive: yes
> X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
>
>
I didn't see this picture. Did you?
| |
| Anonymous Remailer (austria) 2007-10-12, 7:14 am |
|
Anonymous wrote:
> Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote in
> news:1e26a4f3c0d6f78d7c72e477f1a37795@re
mailer.metacolo.com:
>
> I didn't see this picture. Did you?
Yes. Just enough to become ill. :-(
It's a series of a 12-13 year old girl. Probably the pervert's own
daughter, or a close family friend's (apparently taken in the girl's
bedroom). This message is the "teaser". It, and all this sicko's
headers along with all the rest of the filth coming from privacy.LIE
are archived on a site I don't care to disclose at the moment.
Apparently they've been being scrutinized for quite some time now from
both the outside and the inside.
Here's some headers from a "lolita" series posted clear back in 2004
just to give some perspective on how long these sick bitches have been
in the kiddie porn distribution business....
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-33.jpg" 35.0 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:45 +1200
Message-ID: <aom9i0dqsmo80dsdcr65l85c50qk2trmuk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 289
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-39 (1).jpg" 38.5 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:56 +1200
Message-ID: <eom9i0p9qs4k3u3vv2fa8umlrsfcroditf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 318
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Privacy.LIE is a pure Internet shit hole. The lowest of the low, the
scum of the earth. If they're not engaging in their favorite past time
of trading child pornography they're openly spreading their brand of
racism or promoting theft and fraud.
But their time of reckoning and retribution is coming I suspect, because
someone has collected a mind boggling amount of dirt on them. ;-)
| |
| Just this guy... 2007-10-12, 1:12 pm |
| In article < bdba488bd85eb0f98e061dcb979a7191@remaile
r.privacy.at>
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
> Privacy.LIE is a pure Internet shit hole. The lowest of the low, the
> scum of the earth. If they're not engaging in their favorite past time
> of trading child pornography they're openly spreading their brand of
> racism or promoting theft and fraud.
>
> But their time of reckoning and retribution is coming I suspect, because
> someone has collected a mind boggling amount of dirt on them. ;-)
Someone, eh?
;-)
| |
| John Doe 2007-10-13, 1:14 am |
|
that's really bad news.... cotse.net lost a valuable client.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Springfield man, a former cop and clown, faces child-porn charges
> Oct 10, 2007 @ 09:30 AM
> By Sarah Antonacci
> GATEHOUSE NEWS SERVICE
> SPRINGFIELD -
>
> http://www.rrstar.com/homepage/x368603386
>
> A Springfield man who has been a clown, magician, police officer,
> minister, youth counselor and Big Brother volunteer was arrested Tuesday
> on charges of sex tourism and possessing child pornography.
>
> A. Paul Carlock Jr., 57, of the 2300 block of Hedge Lane was arrested in
> Springfield after an investigation sparked by immigration and Homeland
> Security officers in June upon his return to the United States from a
> trip to the Philippines.
>
> According to an affidavit filed in federal court, Carlock was stopped at
> the San Francisco airport June 12 after returning from the Philippines.
> At the airport, Carlock reportedly told immigration officers he had been
> working as a clown at the House of Joy orphanage in San Isidro, a city
> in the Philippines.
>
> Because he was traveling from a country considered to be high-risk for
> child sex tourism and he had direct contact with children, the officers
> asked to look at Carlockâs digital camera and his computer. When they
> searched the computers, they said they found numerous pictures of nude
> young boys.
>
> âThe boys were depicted playing, showering, and sitting clothed but with
> their genitals visible. Some were posing, while others did not seem to
> be aware they were being photographed,â the affidavit stated.
>
> When boys at House of Joy were interviewed in the Philippines in
> September, three boys indicated they had been asleep and awakened to
> find Carlock fondling them.
>
> Carlock initially told investigating officers that the images on his
> computer and camera were photos he had intended to edit so theyâd be
> appropriate to show at his church. He said the photos showed that the
> boys were too poor to afford clothes and that he photographed the naked
> boys because âthatâs how they live,â the affidavit said.
> However, officials found one image marked as "edited," in which the only
> change was that the edited version had been enlarged, according to the
> affidavit.
>
> Officials also allegedly discovered a program on Carlockâs computer
> called âEvidence Eliminator,â which authorities said is marketed as
> being able to erase images from computers to the extent that
> investigators cannot retrieve them. Carlock reportedly said he used
> Evidence Eliminator on the advice of a co-worker who said it could be
> used to clean out files he no longer uses.
>
> A search warrant executed at Carlockâs Springfield home Sept. 28 found
> at least 21 other child pornographic movies, the affidavit said.
>
> Carlock reportedly told investigators he had traveled to House of Joy
> before and that he also had visited an orphanage in Mexico in 2002,
> where he clowned in order to cheer up orphans.
>
> A Web site indicates Carlock and his wife go by the names of âKlutzoâ
> and âSmileeâ when performing as clowns and that they have been in the
> clowning business for at least 10 years.
>
> The site says the couple provides the âvery best in family
> entertainmentâ and that âvacation Bible schools, Sunday school emphasis,
> and childrenâs church are our specialty.â
>
> Paul Carlock also performs as âProfessor Paul the Magician,â according
> to the affidavit.
>
> Federal authorities said Carlock spent more than 20 years in law
> enforcement. His resume reportedly includes: three years as a juvenile
> counselor with the Illinois Department of Corrections; six years as a
> trainer with the Illinois Department of Corrections; six years as a
> Springfield police officer, including four as a youth division
> detective; six years with the Illinois Department of Revenue; four years
> with the Illinois Department of Public Health in the child health
> division; and a period as a Grandview police officer, including several
> years as that departmentâs juvenile officer.
>
> Carlock also is an ordained minister, originally with the Church of
> Nazarene and currently with the Missionary Church International.
>
> Carlock also volunteered with Big Brothers/Big Sisters for about two
> months before he came under investigation. The 6-year-old boy assigned
> as Carlockâs Little Brother reportedly told police Carlock had never
> touched him, but that Carlock had given him two movies â one of the two
> of them fishing together and a second that showed naked pictures of boys
> and girls. Investigators retrieved the DVDs, the affidavit said.
>
> Denise Corcoran-Schainker of Big Brothers/Big Sisters said the
> organization carefully checks the backgrounds of adult volunteers.
>
> âWe run three background checks on all of our volunteers, and all of his
> background checks cleared,â she said. âWe do all we can to make sure a
> childâs safety is never jeopardized. We were fortunate the feds became
> involved in such an early time frame.â
>
> In December 1986, Carlock wrote a letter to the State Journal-Register
> complaining about a cartoon. In the letter, he said he was a
> conservative Christian and not ashamed of the fact.
>
> âI am not in favor of censorship, but do feel that far too much âsmutâ
> has been poured into the minds of Americans by all forms of media,â he
> wrote.
>
> âI have spent the past 16 years in law enforcement and related
> professions. I have spoken with victims and offenders and have read many
> case histories in which pornographic materials played an overwhelming
> role in the events that have left lives shattered and homes broken.â
>
> Later in the letter, he wrote: âWhy is it so unreasonable to assume the
> government has the right to protect the public from the harmful effects
> of pornography (especially in light of the vast amounts of evidence to
> support this claim)?â
>
> Carlock told investigators that his children are grown and said in court
> Tuesday that his wife had filed for divorce earlier that day. Sangamon
> County court records could not be accessed to verify that.
>
> Sarah Antonacci can be reached at 217-788-1529 or sarah.antonacci@sj-r.com.
>
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-13, 7:14 am |
| John "The Baby Raper" Doe wrote:
<flush privacy.lie pedophile sock puppet drivel>
http://www.cquest.toronto.edu/usene...6-06-10-src.txt
Rank Top 25 rejected by Path origin Count SBI (Rank)
1 news.bt.com.POSTED 11726 11732.16 1
2 postnews3.readnews.com 4710 4744.38 3
3 news.usenethost.com 3050 3050.00 4
4 shaw.ca 2030 5544.03 2
5 newshub.netvisao.pt 1440 1440.00 7
6 news.privacy.li 1324 1324.00 9
*snicker*
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-13, 7:14 am |
| John Doe wrote:
* Privacy.LIE - KiddiePorn2News Gateway *
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-33.jpg" 35.0 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:45 +1200
Message-ID: <aom9i0dqsmo80dsdcr65l85c50qk2trmuk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 289
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-39 (1).jpg" 38.5 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:56 +1200
Message-ID: <eom9i0p9qs4k3u3vv2fa8umlrsfcroditf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 318
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Bytes: 186644
Lines: 1434
Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels, www.privacy.li
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2007-10-13, 7:14 am |
| John Doe wrote:
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my Xnews."
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
"I confessed to enjoying child erotic art."
"No babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the
camera knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies."
Message-ID: <Xns98CB6BDA7BE32Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"As for your insult, most know my prefered age for pics to view are
budding 12 - 14 year olds."
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2007-10-13, 7:14 am |
| John Doe wrote:
Can anyone explain how these headers "don't match up"?
-------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Any Phone Safe?
References:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Message-ID: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
-------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant=C2=A9" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggplant@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
> why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
> terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
> Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
the airwaves.
--------------------------------
From: traveler 66 <nore...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: nore...@nym.alias.net
Organization: Anonymous
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:12:39 -0800
Message-ID: <gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: admi...@privacy.li
On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
> smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
> knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
> phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
> apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
> the airwaves.
Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your area for
you.
---------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
traveler 66 wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=3DC2=3DA9 wrote:
>=3D20
>=3D20
> Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your
> area for you.
Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
don't matter now? A couple dozen?=3D20
How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
LOL!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant=C2=A9" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 16:46:13 GMT
Lines: 49
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> traveler 66 wrote:
20[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
> the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
> so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
> Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
> ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
> don't matter now? A couple dozen?=3D20
> How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
> LOL!
WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse issues).
I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond being
a very satified customer with prili. Nothing has come back to haunt me at
all. Who ever said the laws don't matter? Having to put words in peoples
mouths to try to look wise again I see. When do you offer anything to
help anyone? You're just a troll.
------------------------------------
From: Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca>
X-Anonymous: yes
X-Anon-Help: <http://www.deuxpi.ca/>
<mailto:deuxpi-ad...@deuxpi.ca>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
Message-ID: <29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:23:00 -0500 (EST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Eggplant=3DC2=3DA9 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=3D20
> news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed
> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>=3D20
<CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse
> issues).
>=3D20
> I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=3D20
LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant=C2=A9" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
<29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggpl...@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 21:57:02 GMT
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
news:29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a94d@de
uxpi.ca:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Eggplant=3DC2=3DA9 wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> <CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!
> Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
> So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
> Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
> XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
> sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
> Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=3D20
> LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
Boy are you a moron. I'd use remailers for everything and stay anonymous
if I were going to be 2 people. Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my
Xnews. But I don't use remailers. You're way off base as usual.
-------------------------------------=20
| |
|
|
| traveler 66 2007-10-13, 1:11 pm |
| On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:15:41 -0400, John Doe wrote:
> that's really bad news.... cotse.net lost a valuable client.
>
That's about the size of it.
Flush/trolls/spammers
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-14, 1:14 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my Xnews."
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
"I confessed to enjoying child erotic art."
"No babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the
camera knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies."
Message-ID: <Xns98CB6BDA7BE32Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"As for your insult, most know my prefered age for pics to view are
budding 12 - 14 year olds."
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-14, 1:14 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
* Privacy.LIE - KiddiePorn2News Gateway *
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-33.jpg" 35.0 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:45 +1200
Message-ID: <aom9i0dqsmo80dsdcr65l85c50qk2trmuk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 289
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-39 (1).jpg" 38.5 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:56 +1200
Message-ID: <eom9i0p9qs4k3u3vv2fa8umlrsfcroditf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 318
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Bytes: 186644
Lines: 1434
Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels, www.privacy.li
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-14, 1:14 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
* Privacy.LIE number 6 on abuse list. *
Rank Top 25 rejected by Path origin Count SBI (Rank)
1 news.bt.com.POSTED 11726 11732.16 1
2 postnews3.readnews.com 4710 4744.38 3
3 news.usenethost.com 3050 3050.00 4
4 shaw.ca 2030 5544.03 2
5 newshub.netvisao.pt 1440 1440.00 7
6 news.privacy.li 1324 1324.00 9
http://www.cquest.toronto.edu/usene...6-06-10-src.txt
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 caterwauled:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE - KiddiePorn2News Gateway *
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-33.jpg" 35.0 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:45 +1200
Message-ID: <aom9i0dqsmo80dsdcr65l85c50qk2trmuk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 289
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-39 (1).jpg" 38.5 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:56 +1200
Message-ID: <eom9i0p9qs4k3u3vv2fa8umlrsfcroditf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 318
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Bytes: 186644
Lines: 1434
Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels, www.privacy.li
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
| |
|
|
| Anonymous 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 cried:
<FLUSH!>
Can anyone explain how these headers "don't match up"?
-------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Any Phone Safe?
References:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Message-ID: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
-------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggplant@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
> why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
> terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
> Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
the airwaves.
--------------------------------
From: traveler 66 <nore...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: nore...@nym.alias.net
Organization: Anonymous
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:12:39 -0800
Message-ID: <gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: admi...@privacy.li
On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant© wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
> smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
> knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
> phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
> apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
> the airwaves.
Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your area for
you.
---------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
traveler 66 wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your
> area for you.
Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
LOL!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 16:46:13 GMT
Lines: 49
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> traveler 66 wrote:
20[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
> the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
> so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
> Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
> ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
> don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
> How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
> LOL!
WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse issues).
I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond being
a very satified customer with prili. Nothing has come back to haunt me at
all. Who ever said the laws don't matter? Having to put words in peoples
mouths to try to look wise again I see. When do you offer anything to
help anyone? You're just a troll.
------------------------------------
From: Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca>
X-Anonymous: yes
X-Anon-Help: <http://www.deuxpi.ca/>
<mailto:deuxpi-ad...@deuxpi.ca>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
Message-ID: <29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:23:00 -0500 (EST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
> news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed
> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>=20
<CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse
> issues).
>=20
> I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
<29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggpl...@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 21:57:02 GMT
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
news:29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a94d@de
uxpi.ca:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> <CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!
> Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
> So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
> Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
> XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
> sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
> Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
> LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
Boy are you a moron. I'd use remailers for everything and stay anonymous
if I were going to be 2 people. Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my
Xnews. But I don't use remailers. You're way off base as usual.
-------------------------------------
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| John Doe yapped:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE - KiddiePorn2News Gateway *
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-33.jpg" 35.0 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:45 +1200
Message-ID: <aom9i0dqsmo80dsdcr65l85c50qk2trmuk@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 289
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Path: news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
From: Argus <bone@innominate.com>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.ll-series
Subject: aLL the other LLs I have....(for MoreOrLess) - "ll-n4-39 (1).jpg" 38.5 kBytes yEnc
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 04:53:56 +1200
Message-ID: <eom9i0p9qs4k3u3vv2fa8umlrsfcroditf@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Lines: 318
Organization: news.privacy.li
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Subject: A Flavor of Bunny set 60 (005,107), "kleenxBuMod60095.jpg" yEnc (1/1)
From: 23hu@vishnu.hk (Dr. Hu)
Date: 09 Feb 2007 22:26:20 GMT
Message-ID: <45ccf4fa$0$9308$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
Bytes: 186644
Lines: 1434
Organization: Privacy.li- Anonymous news through SSH2-Tunnels, www.privacy.li
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.pictures.webeweb
Sender: 23hu@vishnu.hk
X-Newsposter: YENC-POWER-POST-A&A-v11b (Modified POWER-POST www.CosmicWolf.com)
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:15:41 -0400, John Doe wrote:
>
> That's about the size of it.
Is that what you tell the children you molest you filthy XXXXing baby
raper?
>
> Flush/trolls/spammers
| |
|
|
| Anonymous Sender 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| John Doe blubbered:
<FLUSH!>
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my Xnews."
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
"I confessed to enjoying child erotic art."
"No babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the
camera knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies."
Message-ID: <Xns98CB6BDA7BE32Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"As for your insult, most know my prefered age for pics to view are
budding 12 - 14 year olds."
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 screeched:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE number 6 on abuse list. *
Rank Top 25 rejected by Path origin Count SBI (Rank)
1 news.bt.com.POSTED 11726 11732.16 1
2 postnews3.readnews.com 4710 4744.38 3
3 news.usenethost.com 3050 3050.00 4
4 shaw.ca 2030 5544.03 2
5 newshub.netvisao.pt 1440 1440.00 7
6 news.privacy.li 1324 1324.00 9
http://www.cquest.toronto.edu/usene...6-06-10-src.txt
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| John Doe lied:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE number 6 on abuse list. *
Rank Top 25 rejected by Path origin Count SBI (Rank)
1 news.bt.com.POSTED 11726 11732.16 1
2 postnews3.readnews.com 4710 4744.38 3
3 news.usenethost.com 3050 3050.00 4
4 shaw.ca 2030 5544.03 2
5 newshub.netvisao.pt 1440 1440.00 7
6 news.privacy.li 1324 1324.00 9
http://www.cquest.toronto.edu/usene...6-06-10-src.txt
| |
| George Orwell 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| John Doe moaned:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE Pedophile Speaks Out *
Path: s03-b20.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Privacy.li - From someone with more at stake than these morons.
From: Eggplant <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <Xns980B9A0BEB013Eggplant@63.218.45.254> <a92c46ee84bf92e7b8cd61b411098307@deuxpi.ca> <44c6c9c5$0$15913$450c70f1@news.privacy.li> <de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 26 Jul 2006 12:46:52 GMT
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> nos...@trilightzone.org wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Your happy customer is a confessed child molester.
Wrong idiot. I confessed to enjoying child erotic art. That has nothing
to do with either sex nor molestation except in the perverted minds of
those so conditioned they can't see anything in nudity beyond sex. The
problem is in your own mind. Don't put words in my mouth.
> Please don't let that stop you from rushing to a perverts' defense.
> It's better bad press than anyone else could ever come up with.
The perversion is in your own outlook.
> Everyone take note of what privacy.lie sock puppets stand up for.
> Baby rapers.
Never raped anyone. And define babies. You know nothing but cliches. No
babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the camera
knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies.
And you're so far off topic it's obvious you're grasping at straws. The
topic is privacy and anonimity.
---cut---
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| traveler 66 babbled:
<FLUSH!>
* Privacy.LIE Pedophile Speaks Out *
Path: s03-b20.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Privacy.li - From someone with more at stake than these morons.
From: Eggplant <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <Xns980B9A0BEB013Eggplant@63.218.45.254> <a92c46ee84bf92e7b8cd61b411098307@deuxpi.ca> <44c6c9c5$0$15913$450c70f1@news.privacy.li> <de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 26 Jul 2006 12:46:52 GMT
Lines: 34
X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> nos...@trilightzone.org wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Your happy customer is a confessed child molester.
Wrong idiot. I confessed to enjoying child erotic art. That has nothing
to do with either sex nor molestation except in the perverted minds of
those so conditioned they can't see anything in nudity beyond sex. The
problem is in your own mind. Don't put words in my mouth.
> Please don't let that stop you from rushing to a perverts' defense.
> It's better bad press than anyone else could ever come up with.
The perversion is in your own outlook.
> Everyone take note of what privacy.lie sock puppets stand up for.
> Baby rapers.
Never raped anyone. And define babies. You know nothing but cliches. No
babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the camera
knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies.
And you're so far off topic it's obvious you're grasping at straws. The
topic is privacy and anonimity.
---cut---
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2007-10-14, 7:13 am |
| John Doe babbled:
<FLUSH!>
Can anyone explain how these headers "don't match up"?
-------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Any Phone Safe?
References:
X-No-Archive: Yes
Message-ID: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:30:08 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
-------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggplant@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT
Lines: 17
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Other than having crypto phones on each end what's the safest, most
> anonymous phone you can own nowadays? Is cell safer than landline? Why or
> why not. Anyone who believes that the government only listens to
> terrorists I think is really taking a big risk especially if they are on
> Bush's black list (I am sure he has one).
The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
the airwaves.
--------------------------------
From: traveler 66 <nore...@nym.alias.net>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.14.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Reply-To: nore...@nym.alias.net
Organization: Anonymous
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:12:39 -0800
Message-ID: <gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Lines: 21
X-Complaints-To: admi...@privacy.li
On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant© wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
> news:b61949089c833bede77f7815a32964d7@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within the
> smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> The problem with cell phones is the "implied consent" laws. You are
> knowingly using a portable transmitter/reciever. Anything done on a cell
> phone can be used in court without any privacy protection laws that would
> apply to landlines. No warrant necessary because it was sent openly over
> the airwaves.
Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your area for
you.
---------------------------------------
From: Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
Message-ID: <1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
traveler 66 wrote:
> On 15 Feb 2007 13:46:37 GMT, Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Why don't you post your address here, I'll look up the law in your
> area for you.
Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
LOL!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 16:46:13 GMT
Lines: 49
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> traveler 66 wrote:
20[vbcol=seagreen]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Do you mean "look up" as in the way you ignore and deny the laws in all
> the cheap hosting privacy SHIT HOLES where you rent server space just
> so you can swindle people with your off-shore lies?
> Slimy asslickers like you offering legal research assistance is BEYOND
> ironic. How many times have you tried to tell us local laws and MLATS
> don't matter now? A couple dozen?=20
> How's it feel to have your bullshit come back to haunt you? Hmmmmm?
> LOL!
WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse issues).
I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond being
a very satified customer with prili. Nothing has come back to haunt me at
all. Who ever said the laws don't matter? Having to put words in peoples
mouths to try to look wise again I see. When do you offer anything to
help anyone? You're just a troll.
------------------------------------
From: Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca>
X-Anonymous: yes
X-Anon-Help: <http://www.deuxpi.ca/>
<mailto:deuxpi-ad...@deuxpi.ca>
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
Message-ID: <29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:23:00 -0500 (EST)
Mail-To-News-Contact: a...@dizum.com
Organization: mail2n...@dizum.com
Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in=20
> news:1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0b0e@di
zum.com:A vortex formed
> within the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
>=20
<CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> WTF are you talking about (in your further attempts to confuse
> issues).
>=20
> I don't have a server, nor am I connected to anyone who does beyond
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
-------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.privacy
Subject: Re: Any Phone Safe?
From: "Eggplant©" <vegetab...@theguarden.com>
References: <b61949089c833bede77f7815a3296...@dizum.com>
<Xns98D83ADFDB7DCEggpl...@63.218.45.252>
<gzxeevjdr3jk.1udn2x095zaia$....@40tude.net>
<1af100c765b949c399bfc6d598ce0...@dizum.com>
<Xns98DF50B8F10BAEggpl...@63.218.45.254>
<29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a...@deuxpi.ca>
Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggpl...@63.218.45.252>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.03.24
X-No-Archive: yes
Date: 22 Feb 2007 21:57:02 GMT
Lines: 36
X-Complaints-To: a...@newshosting.com
Anonyma <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca> wrote in
news:29162e230034491ac10bfc386356a94d@de
uxpi.ca:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> Eggplant=C2=A9 wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> <CLIP>
[vbcol=seagreen]
> ROTFLMAO!!!!!
> Forget to change socks there, asslicker?
> So it turns out the "traveler" puppet is also a pedoXXXX pervert called
> Eggfart. That explains a lot. You were always "both" just a couple of
> XXXXtarded asslickers. It's good to know Privacy.LIE and its twin
> sister scam services have such a distinguished customer base.
> Owned by perverted racists..... patronized by racist perverts.=20
> LOL! Outstanding. Thank you. LOL!!
Boy are you a moron. I'd use remailers for everything and stay anonymous
if I were going to be 2 people. Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my
Xnews. But I don't use remailers. You're way off base as usual.
-------------------------------------
| |
|
|
| Anonymous 2007-10-14, 1:14 pm |
| traveler 66 farted:
<FLUSH!>
Message-ID: <Xns98DF8560483E1Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"Yeah, I've forgotten to change nics on my Xnews."
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167>
"I confessed to enjoying child erotic art."
"No babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the
camera knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies."
Message-ID: <Xns98CB6BDA7BE32Eggplant@63.218.45.252>
"As for your insult, most know my prefered age for pics to view are
budding 12 - 14 year olds."
| |
| George Orwell 2007-10-15, 1:12 am |
| traveler 66 wrote:
* Privacy.LIE Pedophile Speaks Out *
Path:
s03-b20.iad01!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post01.iad01!news.privacy.li!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.privacy Subject: Re: Privacy.li - From someone with
more at stake than these morons. From: Eggplant
<vegetab...@theguarden.com> References:
<Xns980B9A0BEB013Eggplant@63.218.45.254>
<a92c46ee84bf92e7b8cd61b411098307@deuxpi.ca>
<44c6c9c5$0$15913$450c70f1@news.privacy.li>
<de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@dizum.com> Organization: 60's Burnout
Message-ID: <Xns980C4455F4457Eggplant@66.250.146.167> User-Agent:
Xnews/5.03.24 X-No-Archive: yes Date: 26 Jul 2006 12:46:52 GMT Lines:
34 X-Complaints-To: admin01@privacy.li
Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in
news:de83075caa71347262a8da85a5c70114@di
zum.com:A vortex formed within
the smokey haze of my alledged mind and became this:
> nos...@trilightzone.org wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Your happy customer is a confessed child molester.
Wrong idiot. I confessed to enjoying child erotic art. That has nothing
to do with either sex nor molestation except in the perverted minds of
those so conditioned they can't see anything in nudity beyond sex. The
problem is in your own mind. Don't put words in my mouth.
> Please don't let that stop you from rushing to a perverts' defense.
> It's better bad press than anyone else could ever come up with.
The perversion is in your own outlook.
> Everyone take note of what privacy.lie sock puppets stand up for.
> Baby rapers.
Never raped anyone. And define babies. You know nothing but cliches. No
babies in my posts. Young and adolescent girls showing off for the
camera knowing exactly what they're doing are not babies.
And you're so far off topic it's obvious you're grasping at straws. The
topic is privacy and anonimity.
---cut---
Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
| |
| OldSage 2007-10-17, 7:14 am |
| In article < 1e26a4f3c0d6f78d7c72e477f1a37795@remaile
r.metacolo.com>,
Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
> Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
>
>
> That should make the privacy.LIE XXXXwits REAL proud since they're
> still scamming and spamming for that piece of shit program.
>
> Maybe the sick XXXX that got busted was one of their customers as a
> matter of fact...
>
you call him a sick XXXX but you should not take the news report at
face value. Ideally, in any democracy populated by fair-minded
individuals, you should wait for a conviction or acquittal. At the very
least, you should analyze the report with a jaundiced eye. There are
clear inconsistencies and other flags that suggest to me that the guy
might have done nothing illegal. You owe it to your fellow man not to
join the mindless, putrid morons baying for blood outside the
courthouse _before_ a trial. In the case of this guy, I seriously doubt
there will even be a trial.
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-19, 1:15 pm |
| OldSage wrote:
> In article < 1e26a4f3c0d6f78d7c72e477f1a37795@remaile
r.metacolo.com>,
> Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> you call him a sick XXXX but you should not take the news report at
> face value. Ideally, in any democracy populated by fair-minded
> individuals, you should wait for a conviction or acquittal. At the very
> least, you should analyze the report with a jaundiced eye. There are
> clear inconsistencies and other flags that suggest to me that the guy
> might have done nothing illegal. You owe it to your fellow man not to
> join the mindless, putrid morons baying for blood outside the
> courthouse _before_ a trial. In the case of this guy, I seriously doubt
> there will even be a trial.
Why? Think he's going to kill himself or something?
And while you're at it, what are these "clear inconsistencies" you're
talking about? The part where he had full frontal nude pictures of
young boys, and when asked about it those boys said he woke them up in
the middle of the night by fondling them? Or maybe the "more than 21
child pornography videos" they found at his house upon further
investigation somehow doesn't "jive" with what a child molester might
do in your mind?
No, you're just one of them pedophile apologists aren't you sonny?
Probably baby raping scum yourself. Next you'll be telling us the poor
misunderstood soul is an art collector or something, won't you?
Save your breath scumbag. The only thing more satisfying than thinking
that this piece of shit might not make it to trial because of a suicide
is thinking he might not make it due to a homicide, and as far as the
civilized world is concerned.... you can join him either way.
| |
| Anonymous 2007-10-19, 7:11 pm |
| OldSage wrote:
> In article < 1e26a4f3c0d6f78d7c72e477f1a37795@remaile
r.metacolo.com>,
> Anonymous Sender <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> you call him a sick XXXX but you should not take the news report at
> face value. Ideally, in any democracy populated by fair-minded
> individuals, you should wait for a conviction or acquittal.
And then stab the sick XXXX in his liver so he dies a slow painful
death.
Go make your pedo apologist pleas somewhere else, freak.
| |
| Glenn P., 2007-10-21, 7:11 pm |
| On 11-Oct-07 at 3:40am +0200, <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> ...Officials also allegedly discovered a program on Carlock's computer
> called "Evidence Eliminator," which authorities said is marketed as
> being able to erase images from computers to the extent that
> investigators cannot retrieve them. Carlock reportedly said he used
> Evidence Eliminator on the advice of a co-worker who said it could
> be used to clean out files he no longer uses.
Well, let that be a lesson to him: no "freespace wiper" program (which
is in this case how he was using "Evidence Eliminator") in the World
will be of any help to you, if you do not delete the offending file(s)
first!!!
(Of course -- ahem! -- DELETING the pix was hardly his intention! What
he REALLY wanted was a good *encryption* program, which would have been
of infinitely more use to him.)
Aren't you glad that pedophiles tend to be so stupid? 
-- _____ %%%%%%%%%%% "Glenn P.," <C128UserDELETE-THIS@FVI.Net> %%%%%%%%%%%
{~._.~} -----------------------------------------------------------------
_( Y )_ "Handsome, pretty, handsome Dr. Smith! He make nose wiggle!"
(:_~*~_ -----------------------------------------------------------------
(_)-(_) The Lady Of The Green Mist (From "Lost In Space")
:: Take Note Of The Spam Block On My E-Mail Address! ::
| |
|
|
|
|
|