Anonymous Servers - Re: Action No. 07 CV8537 (DC)

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > November 2007 > Re: Action No. 07 CV8537 (DC)





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Action No. 07 CV8537 (DC)
we got him

2007-11-26, 7:12 pm

cc: Jerry B. at pr (if he could but stop chuckling for a moment)

On Mon, 26 Nov. 2007 05:18:34 -0800, samsloan <samhsloan@gmail.com> wrote
in article
<036e0640-ee08-4efd-be3e-a3f818252e88@e1g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>:
> Paul Truong sent this one too. Note that the non-disclosed header
> says:
> X-Comment: Patriot Act X-tracker header is injected to identify the
> sender to appropriate authorities
> Also, the IP address is the same.
> So, we got him.
> Sam Sloan


On Mon, 26 Nov. 2007 05:05:57 -0800, samsloan <samhsloan@gmail.com> wrote
in
article
<aa27d1a2-816c-4e90-b2de-39d97a43d48e@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com>:
> I will tell you what this means, or at least what I think this means.
> It means that Paul Truong posted this. Take a look at the top part,
> especially at:

/|\/|\/|\/|\/|\/|\
> X-NNTP-Posting-Host-bak: 75.111.194.9
> That shows that it came from Paul Truong's computer.
> Take a look at my letter to Judge Chin. It says that the two IP addresses
> that Paul Truong posted from were:
> 129.118.87.222
> 75.111.194.9

? The top IP address is a Texas Tech university computer. The second one
> is probably Paul Truong's laptop, which is also where the above anonymous
> posting came from.
> Sam Sloan


Hey, that is great work, Sam. You outwitted all of them. You showed 'em but
good.

Just one teensy-weensy, itsy-bitsy, totally inconsequential matter (now I
have been emailed the interface to post to the NG).

Employ exactly the same reliable detective method that you used above, but
this time use it to check the IP address from whence this message (by that
I mean the one you are reading right now) itself apparently emanated.

I will save you the bother of looking. It says-
X-NNTP-Posting-Host-bak: 69.120.149.154
That is your PC, Sam. The one you are logged on to. The one in the Bronx
that I pinged a few minutes back. All the other IP addresses shown concur.

The User-Agent header (both versions) agrees perfectly with the one from
your postings supra.

Be sure to read the X-Comment: header too, Patriot is so anti-Libertarian.

Did you just prove you are the Fake Sam Sloan? No. Does it prove I sneaked
into your room to make the posting? No. IPs are easy to spoof. Your IP +
User-Agent-based method used to identify PT is totally unreliable and
proves nothing but that you do not have a clue and that your expert is not
an expert. You do not need to claim it was your room-mate or your dog, both
of us already know this message was not written by you, even though your
own method says otherwise.

Paul and Susan might even send you their thanks for winning their case for
them.

Great work, Sam, as I said above. [/sarcasm]

Now I see why trfss called the thread-
"paul truong's great mistake - but sam slipped too"
I am still not sure whether you really were as dumb as to fall for that IP
spoof or are just deliberately playing the XXX again. I speak as one of
your many lifelong supporters, defenders, apologists, which hopefully does
not narrow the field too much.

That is not even starting on the trojan theory. If you had used Trojans,
the world would be a mighty different place. Who infected PT's Tablet may
remain one of those great unsolved mysteries. I am sure it was not you. Not
your style.

Don't get me wrong. I'm glad the Fake Sam Sloan is dead. He, she, it or
them, an Orient Express pullman car full of jerks, was or were making the
NG even more unreadable than you ever managed (I stopped reading it as a
result). Many of its droppings were goddamn offensive, few even remotely
funny, unfair (even?) to you and the collateral damage was wholly
unacceptable.

Ask our pal Mottershead to work out who were the only 2 prolific regular
contributors to rgcp to both never get attacked and never get forged by the
FSS. One is just too obvious. If FSS really was PT (as different from just
the PC of PT) FSS would have been sure to insult this sycophant at least
once if only to throw people off the scent. Just too obvious.

I trust Judge Chin will overlook the provocative typo "Dear Honolable Sir".
Drop the case. You made your point. Discovery will turn up things on your
PCs that you never imagined were (still?) there. Especially drop the suit
against any riled, crazed billy-badger who is digging away as we write. He
has learned his lesson.

Go on. Do as Moskow asked us. Show them your class, Sam. Do as your late
distinguished mother would have done and would have had you do. Take off
the cape and be a real Islamic super-hero. Stop wearing those rediculous
underpants on the outside of your jumpsuit. Drop it. The suit. Not the
pants, even ALJ Pearson's.

For old times' sake, don't play it again, Sam.

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com