Anonymous Servers - Tor not working

Author

Tor not working

Dantelephoneman

2007-11-29, 1:16 am

Ok, for the last 2 days TOR has not been working.
I have uninstalled and reinstalled TOR, Privoxy, Vidalia, and tor
button.

Please help

Here is my log
Nov 27 23:24:24.463 [Notice] Tor v0.1.2.18. This is experimental
software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity.
Nov 27 23:24:24.473 [Notice] Initialized libevent version 1.3e using
method win32. Good.
Nov 27 23:24:24.583 [Notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050
Nov 27 23:24:24.583 [Notice] Opening Control listener on
127.0.0.1:9051
Nov 27 23:25:23.367 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:23.428 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:24.369 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:24.399 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:25.370 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:25.410 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:26.372 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:26.412 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:27.373 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:27.423 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:28.375 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:28.455 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:29.386 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:29.446 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:30.388 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:30.448 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:30.498 [Debug] new_route_len(): Chosen route length 3 (0
routers available).
Nov 27 23:25:30.548 [Info] new_route_len(): Not enough acceptable
routers (0). Discarding this circuit.
Nov 27 23:25:30.598 [Debug] circuit_increment_failure_count():
n_circuit_failures now 1.
Nov 27 23:25:31.389 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
not handled.
Nov 27 23:25:31.970 [Info] circuit_predict_and_launch_new(): Have 0
clean circs (0 internal), need another exit circ.
Nov 27 23:25:32.040 [Debug] new_route_len(): Chosen route length 3 (0
routers available).
Nov 27 23:25:32.110 [Info] new_route_len(): Not enough acceptable
routers (0). Discarding this circuit.
Nov 27 23:25:32.180 [Debug] circuit_increment_failure_count():
n_circuit_failures now 2.

Dantelephoneman

2007-11-29, 1:16 am

Let me add.

This is on a win XP box

I had TOR working for over a year now

Ryan White

2007-11-29, 7:15 am

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:29:13 -0800 (PST), Dantelephoneman wrote:

> Let me add.
>
> This is on a win XP box
>
> I had TOR working for over a year now

HURRY! pOST BACK YOUR ssn, dob, ip AND WIFE'S SEXUAL PREFERENCES.

i CAN HELP HER.

Thomas J. Boschloo

2007-11-29, 7:11 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Dantelephoneman wrote:
> Ok, for the last 2 days TOR has not been working.
> I have uninstalled and reinstalled TOR, Privoxy, Vidalia, and tor
> button.
>
> Please help
>
> Here is my log
> Nov 27 23:24:24.463 [Notice] Tor v0.1.2.18. This is experimental
> software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity.
> Nov 27 23:24:24.473 [Notice] Initialized libevent version 1.3e using
> method win32. Good.
> Nov 27 23:24:24.583 [Notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050
> Nov 27 23:24:24.583 [Notice] Opening Control listener on
> 127.0.0.1:9051
> Nov 27 23:25:23.367 [Debug] circuit_remove_handled_ports(): Port 80 is
> not handled.

http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/The...irewalledClient
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/The...db23e0a5

Some posters claim privoxy is unsafe to use these days as it hasn't been
updated for over a year. I never bothered to check out these rumors.

hth,
Thomas
- --
A society with suicide bombers
is a polite society
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBR08xTwEP2l8iXKAJAQHG9AMfVmTcPJ4I
jESz8F7PmP6wBlDQB2strPdh
o4wEbS8x42PEetPSovNxpOhtuDHhnkAOA41b/RbHt8OfVWUdVu6DrojXlYxBYnwr
J8tXP4kx8bqw+TXN5iIpdj+HWYW9O09UDiltow==

=JiOT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Anonymous Sender

2007-11-29, 7:11 pm

Thomas J. Boschloo wrote:

> Dantelephoneman wrote:
>
> http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/The...irewalledClient
> http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/The...er/TorFAQ#head-
d74c0f4eda831086b7f9e01a0a810663db23e0a5

>
> Some posters claim privoxy is unsafe to use these days as it hasn't been
> updated for over a year. I never bothered to check out these rumors.

It's not that Privoxy isn't itself safe per say, as much as it is the
fact that Privoxy was never meant to be an anonymity tool and because of
that it need special attention that apparently wasn't paid in full.

It's also a matter of it not being necessary in the first place for many
users, which makes it nothing but a potential liability even if it is
configured properly. And by "properly" I'd almost have to say turning off
all of it's actions and filters entirely, and using it as a transparent
proxy with SOCKS support behind a browser where all the active crap was
also completely disabled, "at the source" so to say.

Sort of what Polipo is, except without the cache. Which I don't
personally trust all that much either. An evil site might be able to out
you by simply replacing certain bits of content and then watching whats
loaded from the site and what's not if you happen to revisit the site
naked, even with a different browser.