Anonymous Servers - Eelbash screws it up once again

Author

Eelbash screws it up once again

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

2007-02-13, 1:15 am

He gets a valuable service like the world's only W2N going, he gets
encouragement and compliments from people like me, but then he can't resist
tampering with it and he XXXXs it up so it doesn't function at all.

Is Boschloo right? Is Eelbash a total, complete idiot?

The service is valuable but it's so freaking unreliable that I don't want
to repeatedly waste time only to have posts never show up. What an XXXXXXX.
Tonight he messed with the names of fields in his HTML form and now the
whole thing fails. STOP WASTING OUR TIME.

Borked Pseudo Mailed

2007-02-13, 1:15 am

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, "Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
<mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>He gets a valuable service like the world's only W2N going, he gets
>encouragement and compliments from people like me, but then he can't resist
>tampering with it and he XXXXs it up so it doesn't function at all.
>
>Is Boschloo right? Is Eelbash a total, complete idiot?

Yes. We have been telling you that all along. He is either an utter
psochotic idiot, or an agent provocateur.

>
>The service is valuable but it's so freaking unreliable that I don't want
>to repeatedly waste time only to have posts never show up. What an XXXXXXX.
>Tonight he messed with the names of fields in his HTML form and now the
>whole thing fails. STOP WASTING OUR TIME.

Thomas J. Boschloo

2007-02-13, 7:13 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:
> He gets a valuable service like the world's only W2N going, he gets
> encouragement and compliments from people like me, but then he can't resist
> tampering with it and he XXXXs it up so it doesn't function at all.

The world's only W2N? What about Deja? It must have been worth something
since it was bought by Google on 12th februari 2001.
http://www.google.com/press/pressre...srelease48.html

> Is Boschloo right? Is Eelbash a total, complete idiot?

Of course I am right. Don't be stupid.

Thomas
- --
"Bury your friends deep"
"Bury your enemies even deeper!"
- - Boschloogica 1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBRdGy2AEP2l8iXKAJAQH88wMghlBHKWvL
lVQQkNSjGrooIu/i6LzIiu4Q
H37pHvRigu3UpcVhau/ cQfgx4KaE71rf25afX2oPweeis+dRfr+8fEY9o9s
PbN6O
me4t0QpHAnXsLF0poeK78Srol/iVSjl8n9lEAw==
=9rlV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

admin@eelbash.yi.org

2007-02-13, 1:13 pm

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:15:07 -0700 (MST), Borked Pseudo Mailed
<nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, "Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
><mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
gets[vbcol=seagreen]
can't resist[vbcol=seagreen]
all.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>Yes. We have been telling you that all along. He is either an
utter
>psochotic idiot, or an agent provocateur.
>
don't want[vbcol=seagreen]
an XXXXXXX.[vbcol=seagreen]
now the[vbcol=seagreen]
>

Here is a second test, through tor. If this makes it, I'd have to
say it is working.

Anonyma

2007-02-13, 7:13 pm

On 13 Feb 2007, admin@eelbash.yi.org wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:52:15 +0100, Anonymous Remailer (austria)
>wrote:

>now the
>
>I don't know what you are talking about; I haven't changed any
>field names
>on the form in some time. As far as I know, it's working well.

That's odd, Eel. Does more than one person work on it?

I ask because last night I also saw precisely what the OP describes. The
names of the input elements were latency2, refs2, etc. I know this very
well because I was writing some javascript code to post through your PHP
script. (Do you recall me suggesting javascript about 2-3 weeks ago? The
code I put together yesterday will parse a post and then automatically
supply the data for all your fields, such as Subject:, the quoted text,
etc. It beats having to do it by hand for replies.)

I had made a few successful tests, and then suddenly I was confronted by an
error msg from your script, telling me that I needed to supply a value for
Latency. I checked and discovered that the name for that field in your form
had suddenly changed from latency2 to latency. Other field names had
changed also. I later ended up by trying to only post directly with your
own posting page (my javascript page was not involved) and that posting
failed. Everything had worked fine before that, and then nothing was
working. Today, all is working again. But the names are changed.

You do own the thing and you can do with it what you want, but it would be
nice to have some notice when things are stable.

As for my javascript, it does make things much easier. If anybody thinks
they might want to try/use it, I can post it here. Since it runs right from
an html page, the code is visable to all. It's mostly just using the DOM
and a bit of regex. I don't really know javascript, but learned enough
yesterday to do this, and it works fine.

>
>I appreciate that you have taken the time to test this and give an
>opinion,
>but you will have to be more specific about the problem you are
>seeing if
>I am to fix it.

admin@eelbash.yi.org

2007-02-13, 7:13 pm

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:55:06 -0500, Anonyma wrote:

> On 13 Feb 2007, admin@eelbash.yi.org wrote:
>
>
> That's odd, Eel. Does more than one person work on it?

I'm beginning to think that may be the case.

>
> I ask because last night I also saw precisely what the OP describes. The
> names of the input elements were latency2, refs2, etc.

No they are not, nor ever were.

> I know this very
> well because I was writing some javascript code to post through your PHP
> script. (Do you recall me suggesting javascript about 2-3 weeks ago? The
> code I put together yesterday will parse a post and then automatically
> supply the data for all your fields, such as Subject:, the quoted text,
> etc. It beats having to do it by hand for replies.)

That's very nice. Probably useful for ddosing, but that would be easy to
do in any case. Please post it here. Maybe we can all learn a bit about it.

>
> I had made a few successful tests, and then suddenly I was confronted by
> an error msg from your script, telling me that I needed to supply a value
> for Latency. I checked and discovered that the name for that field in your
> form had suddenly changed from latency2 to latency. Other field names had
> changed also. I later ended up by trying to only post directly with your
> own posting page (my javascript page was not involved) and that posting
> failed. Everything had worked fine before that, and then nothing was
> working. Today, all is working again. But the names are changed.

The names have never been changed. When I run tests, I copy the php script
to a test name and make the changes, but have never changed the existing
names.

I suspect that someone has breached the security of the computer, not only
because of what you have said here, but because of other, recent,
indications.

Anonyma

2007-02-18, 1:12 pm

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:55:06 -0500, Anonyma wrote:

> That's odd, Eel. Does more than one person work on it?
>
> I ask because last night I also saw precisely what the OP describes. The
> names of the input elements were latency2, refs2, etc. I know this very
> well because I was writing some javascript code to post through your PHP
> script. (Do you recall me suggesting javascript about 2-3 weeks ago? The
> code I put together yesterday will parse a post and then automatically
> supply the data for all your fields, such as Subject:, the quoted text,
> etc. It beats having to do it by hand for replies.)
>
> I had made a few successful tests, and then suddenly I was confronted by
> an error msg from your script, telling me that I needed to supply a value
> for Latency. I checked and discovered that the name for that field in your
> form had suddenly changed from latency2 to latency. Other field names had
> changed also. I later ended up by trying to only post directly with your
> own posting page (my javascript page was not involved) and that posting
> failed. Everything had worked fine before that, and then nothing was
> working. Today, all is working again. But the names are changed.
>
> As for my javascript, it does make things much easier. If anybody thinks
> they might want to try/use it, I can post it here.

Please do that. Even if it can't be used as originally intended it sounds
like it would be a sort of front-end to a pop or smtp server.

Would it be possible for the javascript to create a unix-style message
which could then be read by a PERL script and mailed?

> Since it runs right
> from an html page, the code is visable to all. It's mostly just using the
> DOM and a bit of regex. I don't really know javascript, but learned enough
> yesterday to do this, and it works fine.