|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > March 2007 > [EELBASH] Services
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[EELBASH] Services
|
|
|
|
| Anonyma 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> This help file is published periodically.
It was last 'published' less than 8 full days ago.
What's the point of spamming us?
How about posting to alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
instead? That's the group people look at if they
want information about remailers.
Or...how about posting it once every couple of
months?
> 011-44-8700-686454
What is this? It's been brought up by quite a few
people over the weeks, and you've never explained.
It looks exactly like the spam-filter-dodging stuff
added to the end of posts by spammers to try and
avoid getting picked up by duplicate post filters.
It's quite weird.
| |
| Newsanon Admin 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
> In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
> Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> It was last 'published' less than 8 full days ago.
> What's the point of spamming us?
Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators, posts
the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok if other
people did it as well. What do you think?
>
> How about posting to alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
> instead? That's the group people look at if they
> want information about remailers.
It sounds like the group that people look at if they want *stats* about
remailers.
>
> Or...how about posting it once every couple of
> months?
I'll be happy to accede to the consensus of the responsible members of
this group, as long as it applies to everyone who posts here.
>
>
> What is this? It's been brought up by quite a few
> people over the weeks, and you've never explained.
>
> It looks exactly like the spam-filter-dodging stuff
> added to the end of posts by spammers to try and
> avoid getting picked up by duplicate post filters.
Since the entire post is a duplicate, and since the numbers you refer to
don't change from week to week, how can it be a spam-dodging gimmick?
And how can a legitimate message, not asking for money, and on-topic
for the group, posted once a week, possibly be considered spam?
If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
>
> It's quite weird.
So are your complaints.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF7JBCnCWE8SEbcIsRArJiAKDFrDsGJuzm
HYci7uqvKrhuDV22YgCeJNcw
ANgv0SfJmsxRk8iQc0s31go=
=ZeMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Newsanon Admin wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
[snip][vbcol=seagreen]
[snip][vbcol=seagreen]
> If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
> get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
I would love being superior! But I fear it might involve being like you :-(
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBReyYowEP2l8iXKAJAQF9TQMgs/hN+tZHm/zPkhhB5O360VzVpibaKrJ6
G+6B3beFBJkHCqKiyXPlEVfqGvtHTZIkxesKDlbW
kCsn+LWJHh3JbpTXlL93qfDf
n15SJczV11PIMK592Dz19tVd3GpcPAOQ1tY5XA==
=MtKS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonyma wrote:
> In article <45ec3e76$0$22923$ed362ca5@nr2.newsreader.com>
> Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
[snip]
>
> What is this?
It is a phone number in England. 011 is the extension to call from
America. I suggest someone dial it and find out who answers. It is
custom to answer with the digits of the number you just called so you
need to trick this guy. Something about having catched a remailer abuser
or knowing the true identity of Boschloo would probably do the trick.
Eelbash Admin has many triggers.
hi,
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBReybqQEP2l8iXKAJAQHYWQMdEt5unxRI
1OBtFUXpRYPD+uK8TQp0/03q
XNsO25XzNqWOGDjp9cdGx3L7GgrdioE5oY953QrL
JPuti1f3n5v3O5xRzyVnyBLE
/xlo99uhL/In2fnlkE4PQGgvA0xppRDrtXvw6g==
=oS3l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| >> 011-44-8700-686454
>
> What is this?
Could it be the amount of times he's changed the name of his remailer
in the last 8 years?
| |
| Anonymous 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| > Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators, posts
> the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok if other
> people did it as well. What do you think?
Where?! I haven't seen *any* post from Panta admin, including
automated posts, in this group for months.
>
> I'll be happy to accede to the consensus of the responsible members of
> this group, as long as it applies to everyone who posts here.
Well you gave one example of a remop posting every 7 days (which I
personally don't see on my server). There are 30 or so remops. Even
if Panta does post here and my server mysteriously deletes them, it
seems to be the consensus of other remops not to do it.
But it's typical of you to pick out one example and ignore the majority.
> Since the entire post is a duplicate, and since the numbers you refer to
> don't change from week to week, how can it be a spam-dodging gimmick?
I don't think he was suggesting you were using the numbers as a spam
dodging gimmick, but rather that the only time anyone sees such
numbers on a post is from spammers. That was probably why he, and
others, have asked what they are. Because they seem meaningless
*because* your post doesn't need a spam dodging gimmick.
> If you can figure out what it is, it will do you some good; it might even
> get you to give up your inferior culture for one that is superior.
Is this the whole "Chinese people are superior to every other race"
crap you insist on spouting every now and then?
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| In article <45ec9baa$0$11985$e4fe514c@dreader14.news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>
> It is a phone number in England. 011 is the extension to call from
> America. I suggest someone dial it and find out who answers. It is
> custom to answer with the digits of the number you just called so you
> need to trick this guy. Something about having catched a remailer abuser
> or knowing the true identity of Boschloo would probably do the trick.
> Eelbash Admin has many triggers.
Heh, if it is a phone number in England, the chances are it's someone
'identified' by Eelbash as an 'abuser' and he decided to put their
phone number in every single post.
You know, like his idol Frog Admin; he put the email address of
someone he didn't like in the headers of every single post.
| |
| Newsanon Admin 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:08:48 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
> Where?! I haven't seen *any* post from Panta admin, including
> automated posts, in this group for months.
See an automated post of his from feb 26. The previous one is from feb 12.
His name is in the subject. It looks like he's switched to a two-week
schedule, so I'll do the same.
By the way, this has nothing to do with Panta except that I take his
posts here to be examples of what is acceptable. Rather than go against
the norm, it makes sense to me to follow a good example, that being
Panta's.
>
> But it's typical of you to pick out one example and ignore the majority.
It is? You just made that up, didn't you?
>
> Is this the whole "Chinese people are superior to every other race"
> crap you insist on spouting every now and then?
Is it? You just made that up, didn't you?
Superior Anonymous Services: http://eelbash.yi.org:8080/info/
| |
| George Orwell 2007-03-05, 7:13 pm |
| Newsanon Admin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:24:23 -0500, Anonyma wrote:
>
>
> Since the Panta admin, one of our most esteemed remailer operators,
> posts the same kind of information every 7 days, I figured it was ok
> if other people did it as well. What do you think?
I think you're not Panta Admin, and comparing yourself to him is an
insult.
I think that you don't deserve the same respect, privileges, and
latitudes Panta Admin does because while he has worked to uphold the
principal of free speech and promote remailer usage in general, you've
done absolutely nothing but actively or inadvertently try to destroy
anonymity and the remailer network, then purposefully campaign against
the people who are anonymity's staunchest supporters when they
discarded you as a sick freak.
I think the remailer network and the privacy community in general would
be better off if you had never been born, but since we can't
retroactively correct your mother's drinking problem or her sperm
donor's genetics, we'll just continue to point out what a direct
threat you are to personal privacy, and insist that you not be allowed
to function to any degree that allows your bizarre infatuations to be
a serious problem.
And I think that to this end, everything you do or say regardless of
what pseudonyms you hide behind needs to be questioned, dissected, and
ultimately discarded.
So, is there anything else you need cleared up today?
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2007-03-06, 1:13 am |
| Newsanon Admin wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:08:48 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
>
> See an automated post of his from feb 26. The previous one is from
> feb 12. His name is in the subject. It looks like he's switched to a
> two-week schedule, so I'll do the same.
>
> By the way, this has nothing to do with Panta except that I take his
> posts here to be examples of what is acceptable. Rather than go
> against the norm, it makes sense to me to follow a good example, that
> being Panta's.
The "norm" is not to post that stuff here. Panta gets away with it
because he's one of the good guys. You are not. You'll never get away
with it no matter how much you try to rationalize it or compare
yourself to real RemOps. And you have nobody to blame for any of it but
yourself, no matter what your warped sense of reality tells you or who
you try to pass that blame off onto.
>
>
> It is? You just made that up, didn't you?
No, it's true. And obvious to anyone reading any of this or any of your
long history of abnormal behavior and ridiculous justifications of the
same. If you had any serious intention of being "normal" you wouldn't
even be in the situation you're in now. This conversation wouldn't
even be taking place.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-06, 1:14 pm |
| Newsanon Admin wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:41:26 +0100, Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
>
> I don't for one second believe that Panta admin would even try to, as you
> put it, "get away" with anything. If he posts informational messages here,
> they are, by definition, acceptable.
I get away with replying to you almost every day. And still people tell
other people not to feed the pig.
Thomas
--
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-06, 1:14 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> In article <45ec9baa$0$11985$e4fe514c@dreader14.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Heh, if it is a phone number in England, the chances are it's someone
> 'identified' by Eelbash as an 'abuser' and he decided to put their
> phone number in every single post.
>
> You know, like his idol Frog Admin; he put the email address of
> someone he didn't like in the headers of every single post.
If that was an abuser, he is one clever bastard!
http://www.uk2numbers.co.uk/index.c...upport&cat=0870
http://www.primex.co.uk/index.php?t...al&display=0870
As I said. Only one way to find out. And I distrust phones ever since
the alien plot to make us stupider than they are with the sixty cycle hum.
Call from work! Tell you boss you punched in the wrong number! The group
has a right to know about what superior culture it is that is not ours!
Bet it has something to do with gastropods.
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRe1tSwEP2l8iXKAJAQHk1gMfXDq/1fHducgkvEcnus6Kkx9ZUV1JPSQm
7dFEssbpeEWLtshqT8TkVuBxEFarzTtCE0knMOu9
ulR7ZjJb3YfkT0pJwVzuQs0E
k4tgdqi4a3aQNyyslAGI6D0Q0jMP5VwJ3MXuxg==
=3I10
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Nomen Lapetos 2007-03-06, 7:14 pm |
|
"Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer" <anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote in
message news:b692294b82b5dd916c2478530babefee@re
mailer.cyberiade.it...
> In article <45ec9baa$0$11985$e4fe514c@dreader14.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Heh, if it is a phone number in England, the chances are it's someone
> 'identified' by Eelbash as an 'abuser' and he decided to put their
> phone number in every single post.
>
> You know, like his idol Frog Admin;
FROG !!!
I MISS YOU !!
THESE GUYS ARE ALL ASSHOLES.
COME BACK!
* FROG !! *
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-06, 7:14 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Eelbash Admin wrote:
>
> This is a periodic listing of the Eelbash services.
>
> Blow job $10
> Anal $20
> Erotic Massage $5
> Bondage $30
> Spanking $30
> Animals (cats) $40
> Animals (hamsters) $15
> Diapers $20
> Trampling $14
> Urine $12
> Torture $50
> Live remailer monitoring $99
>
> Call +44-8700-686454 for a complete list of services! (6.73p per minute)
Wow! That is quite the list Eelbash Admin. You are more talented than I
gave you credit for. It is a wonder you have time left at all to post here!
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRe32KgEP2l8iXKAJAQEkDwMgtr5NIM/j91v8PxNRoGOV9SCtXQUzLx6W
jIsIHk3SuLzt7ArriEpnlRPIUWahxAFqjneke2HK
zbNnr9gOBV2EAV0DF20HK2i9
gBJBMVzywsiALKeQHBxQBSXIb2kZXcC566Z4DA==
=q4nn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Non scrivetemi 2007-03-06, 7:14 pm |
| Newsanon Admin wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:41:26 +0100, Non scrivetemi wrote:
>
>
> I don't for one second believe that Panta admin would even try to, as
> you put it, "get away" with anything. If he posts informational
> messages here, they are, by definition, acceptable.
That's the point dummy. His are, yours aren't. Welcome to the reality
of a situation you've invested years of childishness and lies in
creating. You've finally excelled at something. Being a failure.
All you ever wanted was to be some sort of "centerpiece", but while
Panta Admin is a respected remailer operator you're nothing but a
laughing stock reject because even a group of people specifically
dedicated to the free flow of information got so disgusted with your
juvenile bullshit they kicked your sorry XXX to the curb.
Yup. That's right, your pathetic attempts to steal the title of
Homecoming Queen backfired because you just don't possess even a level
of adult adult social skills necessary to satisfy the people who are
inherently the most tolerant of bad behavior. You're such an asshat
even *they* can't stand you.
Honestly dummy, how did it feel when you finally had to admit to
yourself that you couldn't run a remailer any more? That nobody
wants you around? I'll bet you were just so proud of yourself, huh?
/me laughs at the pathetic eel.....
| |
| Newsanon Admin 2007-03-07, 1:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
This thread has gone on longer than normal for an informational message,
but it is worth mentioning a recent addition.
People like to see immediate results of their posts, it seems, so I added
a facility to the Web2News utility to allow people to sign up and post to
the Eelbash Anonymous Blog via Tor, which means their key will be added
within seconds of when they send it, and their posts will appear within
seconds of being sent.
See: http://eelbash.yi.org:8080/blogs/inst.html.
Questions? Please ask here.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF7rTFnCWE8SEbcIsRAstqAJ0enAXw1XvQ
gga+pf1xEGILoaGKmQCfXJLo
VYb6xsSPat+v2qbKCXygrdM=
=PMxx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2007-03-07, 1:12 pm |
| In article <20070307125220.JaE5dZkYi3Db@anonymous.poster>
Newsanon Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> This thread has gone on longer than normal for an informational message,
> but it is worth mentioning a recent addition.
It's usenet. Threads take on a life of their own. I'm still reading a
thread in some group that started off by announcing a new freeware
piece of software, and is now on it's 500th post and the subject is
about sheep sheering. I'm not even sure why I'm still reading it to be
honest.
>
> People like to see immediate results of their posts, it seems, so I added
> a facility to the Web2News utility to allow people to sign up and post to
> the Eelbash Anonymous Blog via Tor, which means their key will be added
> within seconds of when they send it, and their posts will appear within
> seconds of being sent.
You seem to have missed the importance of latency in regards to
anonymity. Instant sending doesn't provide anonymity. The only
anonymity anyone might get in using your instant send thing is Tor
itself, and you may as well just use Google to post through if you're
using Tor and want instant sending.
| |
| Anonyma 2007-03-07, 1:12 pm |
| In article <45edf64c$0$31461$e4fe514c@dreader16.news.xs4all.nl>
"Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Wow! That is quite the list Eelbash Admin. You are more talented than I
> gave you credit for. It is a wonder you have time left at all to post here!
>
> Thomas
We can tell it's fake, because everyone knows that he performs "Live remailer
monitoring" for free.
| |
| Newsanon Admin 2007-03-07, 1:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:24:57 +0100, Cyberiade.it wrote:
> In article <20070307125220.JaE5dZkYi3Db@anonymous.poster> Newsanon Admin
> <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>
> It's usenet. Threads take on a life of their own.
That's true. I think there was one in sci.physics from last year that went
on for over 5000 posts.
> I'm still reading a
> thread in some group that started off by announcing a new freeware piece
> of software, and is now on it's 500th post and the subject is about
> sheep sheering. I'm not even sure why I'm still reading it to be honest.
>
>
>
> You seem to have missed the importance of latency in regards to
> anonymity.
I'm aware that its lack is a weakness of Tor. I assume that Tor is good
enough to protect you if you are irritating a large corporation or some
local politician. If you threaten to blow Bush's head off, it might not
keep you anonymous. Is that a reasonable assessment?
> Instant sending doesn't provide anonymity. The only anonymity anyone
> might get in using your instant send thing is Tor itself,
Of course. Used without Tor, it's just an online template for sending
email.
> and you may as well just use Google to post through if you're using Tor
> and want instant sending.
What distinguishes my utility from Yahoo mail or Google is that it doesn't
require signing in or other validation to be used - you just go to the
site and post. Also, if you want a particular online persona, you can
choose a 'from' header simply by typing it into the template.
And, a not inconsiderable advantage, you don't have to wade through a
screenful of advertisments or have your browser slow to a crawl because of
all the junk on the page.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF7scEnCWE8SEbcIsRAhERAKDBdGUHoPFL
fwXletco26pJob4LgACdES5k
h2Rji3yn2gwhIhFzVrzN2lw=
=c6Li
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-07, 1:12 pm |
| Anonyma wrote:
> In article <45edf64c$0$31461$e4fe514c@dreader16.news.xs4all.nl>
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> We can tell it's fake, because everyone knows that he performs "Live remailer
> monitoring" for free.
So you can tell? What tipped you off? That you don't make any money of
the services you offer because noone in their right mind would pay for
the mess you call Eelbash?!
Thomas
--
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2007-03-07, 7:12 pm |
| In article < 11b44f3cc53be9cf5715fe21598567ea@pboxmix
.winstonsmith.info>
Non scrivetemi <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
>
> Honestly dummy, how did it feel when you finally had to admit to
> yourself that you couldn't run a remailer any more? That nobody
> wants you around? I'll bet you were just so proud of yourself, huh?
>
> /me laughs at the pathetic eel.....
>
Will you ever be restarting the Twisty remailer, or
is it down for good?
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-07, 7:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> In article < 11b44f3cc53be9cf5715fe21598567ea@pboxmix
.winstonsmith.info>
> Non scrivetemi <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
>
> Will you ever be restarting the Twisty remailer, or
> is it down for good?
Oh my, concentrate on a single target and lose track of the bigger picture!
You know I do that too sometimes. But it works to my advantage that you
are the only target deserving of trashing each day.
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRe8aswEP2l8iXKAJAQFHRQMgo9BQCMmf
jLdCWeFlNHZiRfJ89qLx/byv
N2nS7UMBD02x8i23bqFngej1E0nUP0ZjgkzZ6g92
rBb2jZQmPJ/8Qij1H1kxkCji
2ELLsj7H9wMxpOHjuezYxO1MuTfVPcGogPJFMg==
=GYm7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonyma 2007-03-08, 1:12 pm |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> In article
> < 11b44f3cc53be9cf5715fe21598567ea@pboxmix
.winstonsmith.info> Non
> scrivetemi <nonscrivetemi@pboxmix.winstonsmith.info> wrote:
>
> Will you ever be restarting the Twisty remailer, or
> is it down for good?
I'm not Twisty Admin.
WTF are you talking about in any case? Twisty closed due to anonymous,
targeted abuse, probably perpetrated by you, and if you have any
evidence to contradict Twisty Admin's own words then by all means feel
free to post it.
[ insert crickets chirping here ]
Your long list of dung heap remailers, on the other hand, were finally
brought to an amusing conclusion by the open and willful actions of the
very same group of people you desperately want to be a part of. No
sneaking behind your back, no middle of the night death threats. You
were just ignored into oblivion by the thing you'll never be.
[ insert snickers and laughter here ]
| |
| Anonymous 2007-03-08, 7:40 pm |
| Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
> I'm not Twisty Admin.
>
> WTF are you talking about in any case? Twisty closed due to anonymous,
> targeted abuse, probably perpetrated by you, and if you have any
> evidence to contradict Twisty Admin's own words then by all means feel
> free to post it.
Seems you must be either Twisty Admin. Or you must be the abuser to know
this. I vote for the former!
It was discussed. But not in as much detail as quoted above. Not even on
the remops list!
| |
| Frog Admin 2007-03-09, 1:13 pm |
| "Nomen Lapetos" <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
>FROG !!!
>
> I MISS YOU !!
>
>THESE GUYS ARE ALL ASSHOLES.
>
> COME BACK!
>
> * FROG !! *
I miss you too, Grasshopper. I shall return soon.
F-A
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-09, 1:13 pm |
| Frog Admin wrote:
> "Nomen Lapetos" <nospam@nospam.com> writes:
>
> I miss you too, Grasshopper. I shall return soon.
Seems to me there will only be more of us when that happens.
I get it. Frog-Admin is a bigger XXXXXXX than all of us combined! Nomen
is trying to lure him back with us as bait.
<rotflol>
Thomas
--
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
| |
| Anonyma 2007-03-09, 1:13 pm |
| On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:34:37 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
> Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
What words? Did Twisty accuse Eelbash of targeting him with abuse to get
him closed down? All I remember is that Twisty came on and said he was
closing without saying exactly what had happened and not accusing anyone
in particular.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Seems you must be either Twisty Admin. Or you must be the abuser to know
> this. I vote for the former!
>
> It was discussed. But not in as much detail as quoted above. Not even on
> the remops list!
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-09, 1:13 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anonyma wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:34:37 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
> What words? Did Twisty accuse Eelbash of targeting him with abuse to get
> him closed down? All I remember is that Twisty came on and said he was
> closing without saying exactly what had happened and not accusing anyone
> in particular.
There are only three people that know what happened to Twisty. That is
me, Twisty Admin and Eelbash Admin. Of these three Eelbash Admin knows
the least because he was not an online friend of Twisty Admin. The
reason that Twisty Admin was picked on was that Twisty Admin stood up
for me in this very newsgroup. As he has repeatedly said himself,
Eelbash Admin can't stand asslickers. (unless he himself is involved)
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRfF4dwEP2l8iXKAJAQEuFAMfb8Og+urJ
n4/CIxNGHQFGTeQCkytgjBY2
+pvpjvKOeI5FvEIwgTmKWUQV+Bie25PyxDWaXFko
7tlr5zCMsjS3Ijw100Nz9l/B
xKtcgAsahtIly5iiU9ta1dSrR8LuwQgfZLH3yg==
=CXUW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| |
| Anonymous 2007-03-09, 7:14 pm |
| Anonymous <nobody@mixmin.net> wrote:
> Anonyma <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
>
> Seems you must be either Twisty Admin. Or you must be the abuser to know
> this. I vote for the former!
More like he can read and remember it for more than a few minutes.
You didn't answer the question you were asked a little bit ago. How
did it feel when you finally had to look at yourslef in the mirror
and admit you were so despised by the group you wanted to be part of
you could no longer even participate?
How does it feel to wake up every morning and know that all you'll
ever be able to do (for now anyway) is to make a pathetic fool of
yourslef by pretending you're contributing with broken web based
crap nobody will ever use except to kick you some more?
>
> It was discussed. But not in as much detail as quoted above. Not even on
> the remops list!
How would you know? You're not included in any discussion among
Remailer Operators, and never were. You don't even know where they
take place, and never will.
It's almost sad really. Except that you've been such a twat for so
long now nobody can feel sorry for you in the least. You deserve
everything you get. You've earned it fair and square.
| |
| Nomen Nescio 2007-03-09, 7:14 pm |
| On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:49:28 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
> How would you know? You are not included in any discussion among
> Remailer Operators, and never were. You don't even know where they
> take place, and never will.
It sounds like a child's version of hell: excluded from the clubhouse;
never to know the secret knock; never to hear the latest news.
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-09, 7:14 pm |
| Nomen Nescio wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 20:49:28 +0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
>
> It sounds like a child's version of hell: excluded from the clubhouse;
> never to know the secret knock; never to hear the latest news.
You seem to be forgetting that your are old news now and aiming to
surpass that.
Thomas
--
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
| |
| Fritz Wuehler 2007-03-10, 1:15 am |
| "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
> There are only three people that know what happened to Twisty. That is
> me, Twisty Admin and Eelbash Admin. Of these three Eelbash Admin knows
> the least because he was not an online friend of Twisty Admin. The
I know Twisty Admin in real life, so nya nya nyaaaaaa. ;)
| |
| Thomas J. Boschloo 2007-03-10, 7:13 am |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> "Thomas J. Boschloo" <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
>
> I know Twisty Admin in real life, so nya nya nyaaaaaa. ;)
Send him my best wishes and a happy trouble free life :-)
Thomas
- --
"Forget it. I am taking my own chances now" - Dee, Mean Guns
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBRfKVSQEP2l8iXKAJAQHrkwMfSv8Hz/GI+a7HANjAhahZB5aZEhi4n14t
VzVUTyp9XMiAXG24yHsxq/PB+xQijhJBzxuaWN5I/f9h5iiwZhLcLUuj411bwPZc
vrdPu0I3HDUusKPViAIQ2FMmcfEtJwiCSR27cg==
=fTzu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
|