|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > March 2007 > Privacy.li keeps logs
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Privacy.li keeps logs
|
|
| George Orwell 2007-03-22, 7:13 pm |
| Privacy.li keeps logs, their admin even admitted it when he said he was
tracing users to see where they came from.
| |
| Gogarty 2007-03-23, 1:13 am |
| In article < 3c52652c9f3efd8a029e6349dd6bb12f@mixmast
er.it>,
nobody@mixmaster.it says...
>
>
>Privacy.li keeps logs, their admin even admitted it when he said he was
>tracing users to see where they came from.
>
So do you.
| |
| Aunti Virus 2007-03-23, 7:12 pm |
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In article <20070323081224.FMfcLJQyk4My@anonymous.poster>
"[Anon] Anon User" <anon-bounces@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
> This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
> server at deuxpi.ca. If you do not want to receive anonymous
> messages, please contact deuxpi-admin@deuxpi.ca. For more information
> about anonymity, see http://mixminion.net.
>
>
>
> Why would an anon server log, since
> the source is anon and for practical
> purposes untraceable?
Because the have to keep minimal logs at least so they can know who to bill
for what and be able to do something about abusers.
Also because Privacy li is not an anon server, it's a privacy service at
best and from all i've seen, a piss poor one at that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/ AwUBRgQJywc1ZuHjbNh8EQKYHQCdHwrNJoZPepjw
e1JEY85kIiyyojIAn0T2
Ek4Jysfy31U0HClJDWwKwish
=hUV/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.
| |
| ghaaaaaaz@yahoo.com 2007-03-25, 1:13 pm |
| On Mar 24, 12:48 am, Aunti Virus <"auntivyrus ATnym.panta-
rhei.eu.org"@remailer-debian.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> In article <20070323081224.FMfcLJQyk...@anonymous.poster>
> "[Anon] Anon User" <anon-boun...@deuxpi.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Because the have to keep minimal logs at least so they can know who to bill
> for what and be able to do something about abusers.
>
> Also because Privacy li is not an anon server, it's a privacy service at
> best and from all i've seen, a piss poor one at that.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: N/A
>
> iQA/ AwUBRgQJywc1ZuHjbNh8EQKYHQCdHwrNJoZPepjw
e1JEY85kIiyyojIAn0T2
> Ek4Jysfy31U0HClJDWwKwish
> =hUV/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
> The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
> is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
> than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visitwww.panta-rhei.eu.org
> for abuse and hashcash info.
for more info look this page : http://d.1asphost.com/amar4
|
|
|
|
|