| Dr. §¤¤§ =?iso-8859-1?Q? 2007-06-21, 1:15 am |
| "Dr. §¤¤§" <"=?iso-8859-1?Q?
<=A7=A4=A4=A7@dodgeit.com>,?="@pseudo.borked.net> wrote in message
news:389ca2395dfe772ac0f58c293df36244@ps
eudo.borked.net...
> First, you're a 'supposed' anonymous remailer operator <snicker... yeah,
> right.>... so you should know better.
>
> Second, you're bound and determined to 'out' anyone as a pedo that dares
> to
> oppose your stupidity... even to the point of 'outing' a Tor exit node.
>
> Third, even after you're shown that the IP in question is a Tor exit node,
> you desperately cling to the hope that the person you're going obsesso
> over
> actually runs that Tor node... except that in doing so, you only show even
> more of your utter cluelessness.
>
> Seconds, anyone?
And finally (although I'm sure this isn't the final bout of stupidity we'll
see from privacy.li), this isn't the first time you've been caught 'outing'
an IP address that belongs to a Tor exit node... in fact, this is the second
time THIS WEEK that you've done it.
It's bad enough that you're so clueless that you don't understand how
anonymity works, yet you're running an anonymous remailer, but the fact that
you're running an anonymous remailer, and publishing the IP addresses of
people accessing your server, while insinuating that they're pedophiles
makes you the most vile scum on the face of the planet.
You're spying on the users of your anonymity service, then outing them...
which is more kookish than anything I've ever witnessed.
So, someone give me a second on this nomination of Privacy.li for Clueless
Newbie of the Month... this XXXXer deserves it.
|