Anonymous Servers - Anonymous Newsgroup Creation?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > June 2007 > Anonymous Newsgroup Creation?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Anonymous Newsgroup Creation?
HoozyWatsis

2007-06-28, 1:14 pm

Which remailers, if any, support the anonymous creation or "boosting" of newsgroups (i.e., which
ones do NOT filter out the "Control: newgroup" header)???

Anonymous Sender

2007-06-28, 7:13 pm

In article <8e49b6141bd362c5b60fd9de60fa0b81@pseudo.borked.net>
"HoozyWatsis" <HoozyWatsis@Blank.SHH> wrote:
>
> Which remailers, if any, support the anonymous creation or "boosting" of newsgroups (i.e., which
> ones do NOT filter out the "Control: newgroup" header)???
>


None of them, people would go crazy cancelling messages.

Glenn P.,

2007-06-28, 7:13 pm

On 28-Jun-07 at 6:52pm -0000, <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

[vbcol=seagreen]
> None of them, people would go crazy cancelling messages.


Ahem: he didn't say "Control: cancel", he said "Control: newgroup"...

-- "Glenn P.," <C128UserDELETE-THIS@FVI.Net>
_____ ------------------------------------------ _____
{~._.~} Bend and Stretch! Reach for the stars! {~._.~}
_( Y )_ There goes Jupiter, here comes Mars! _( Y )_
(:_~*~_ Bend and Stretch! Reach for the sky! (:_~*~_
(_)-(_) Stand on tippytoe, oh so high! (_)-(_)
------------------------------------------
%%%%%%% "Romper Room" - Circa 1965 %%%%%%%

:: Take Note Of The Spam Block On My E-Mail Address! ::
Anonymous

2007-06-28, 7:13 pm

Glenn P., wrote:

> On 28-Jun-07 at 6:52pm -0000, <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Ahem: he didn't say "Control: cancel", he said "Control: newgroup"...


Which is irrelevant because Control headers are typically removed with
regex that matches ^Control:.* or something very like it.

By the way, a proper sigdash is two dashes, a space, and a newline. And
it's proper netiquette to keep signatures to four lines. lease at least
try to fix the former as it defeats readers that remove signatures for
replies. TIA.

>
> -- "Glenn P.," <C128UserDELETE-THIS@FVI.Net>
> _____ ------------------------------------------ _____
> {~._.~} Bend and Stretch! Reach for the stars! {~._.~}
> _( Y )_ There goes Jupiter, here comes Mars! _( Y )_
> (:_~*~_ Bend and Stretch! Reach for the sky! (:_~*~_
> (_)-(_) Stand on tippytoe, oh so high! (_)-(_)
> ------------------------------------------
> %%%%%%% "Romper Room" - Circa 1965 %%%%%%%
>
> :: Take Note Of The Spam Block On My E-Mail Address! ::


Anonymous

2007-06-28, 7:13 pm

Glenn P., wrote:

> On 28-Jun-07 at 6:52pm -0000, <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Ahem: he didn't say "Control: cancel", he said "Control: newgroup"...


Doesn't matter. They're all blocked.




Anonymous Remailer (austria)

2007-06-28, 7:13 pm


In article <6dae4761a7365b85f50a922035d3cb27@awxcnx.de>
Anonymous <mix@awxcnx.de> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Glenn P., wrote:
>
>
> Which is irrelevant because Control headers are typically removed with
> regex that matches ^Control:.* or something very like it.
>
> By the way, a proper sigdash is two dashes, a space, and a newline. And
> it's proper netiquette to keep signatures to four lines. lease at least
> try to fix the former as it defeats readers that remove signatures for
> replies. TIA.
>

So why is yours longer than 4 lines, hypocrite?

Anonymous

2007-06-29, 1:14 am

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:

> In article <6dae4761a7365b85f50a922035d3cb27@awxcnx.de>
> Anonymous <mix@awxcnx.de> wrote:
>
> So why is yours longer than 4 lines, hypocrite?


WTF are you babbling about simpleton? It was a quote of "Glenn P.'s" sig.

The IQ in this group is plummeting.





























Anonymous

2007-06-29, 1:14 am

In article <fc022503a99fbab20ba7be42a7b2edf3@awxcnx.de>
Anonymous <mix@awxcnx.de> wrote:
>
> The IQ in this group is plummeting.


As if you're helping it any, troll.

Anonymous Sender

2007-06-29, 1:14 am

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:

>
> So why is yours longer than 4 lines, hypocrite?


Uh.... what?

/me shakes head

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

2007-06-29, 7:13 am


In article <03993c3cb845ed44dd43fedeac3ffc44@ecn.org>
Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> wrote:
>
> In article <fc022503a99fbab20ba7be42a7b2edf3@awxcnx.de>
> Anonymous <mix@awxcnx.de> wrote:
>
> As if you're helping it any, troll.


Please explain how he's a troll? You seem to have a different
definition of the word to everyone elses.

Nomen Nescio

2007-06-30, 1:14 am

"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

> Please explain how he's a troll? You seem to have a different
> definition of the word to everyone elses.


SHUT UP, EELBASH!

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com