|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > July 2007 > Cotse Fraud
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| buthead@anomail.com 2007-06-25, 7:13 am |
| Privacy shield or Anonymous, both are on your web site. Which is it assholes?, why do you have anonymous on your site you XXXXing scammers!
I thought no one can make you anonymous, especially you. LIARS
d$IK[lc=WxAbXF#3419ymyTji+27(Sm`
| |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed 2007-06-25, 1:13 pm |
| buthead@anomail.com wrote:
> Privacy shield or Anonymous, both are on your web site. Which is it
assholes?, why do you have anonymous on your site you XXXXing scammers!
> I thought no one can make you anonymous, especially you. LIARS
>
>
At first I didn't believe you, I had to see this for myself. Could the
revered cotse that haunts your dreams be guilty of blasphemy and worthy
of scorn? If it was true it would shine a light on everything and give
me a new perspective on why I should continue not to care. So I checked
it out, using Tor of course, I wanted to be safe after seeing privacy
services in action in here. After reading what their pages say I only
can come to one conclusion, WTF are you smoking?
| |
| Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer 2007-06-25, 1:13 pm |
| In article <d4b51a83085612222bc3d8d853897850@pseudo.borked.net>
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net> wrote:
>
> buthead@anomail.com wrote:
>
> assholes?, why do you have anonymous on your site you XXXXing scammers!
>
> At first I didn't believe you, I had to see this for myself. Could the
> revered cotse that haunts your dreams be guilty of blasphemy and worthy
> of scorn? If it was true it would shine a light on everything and give
> me a new perspective on why I should continue not to care. So I checked
> it out, using Tor of course, I wanted to be safe after seeing privacy
> services in action in here. After reading what their pages say I only
> can come to one conclusion, WTF are you smoking?
Technically, the words "anonymous" and "anonymity" do appear in the meta-
tags of the main page, for search hit purposes.
<meta name="description" content="Cotse.Net Privacy Service, a
Packetderm LLC Company. Focusing on providing the very best privacy
service on the Internet.">
<META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="Privacy Service, online privacy,
anonymous, anonymity, privacy, private, security, secure, safe, email,
e-mail, webmail, protect, protection, safety, safe, spam, anti-spam,
antispam, anti, spam, unlimited aliases, automatically expiring
aliases, certified mail receipt, proxy, webproxy, web-proxy, web,
transparent, cgi, filter, filters, filtering, spam-filter,
spam-filters, spamfilter, spamfilters, spam-filtering, spamfiltering,
Bayesian, DNSBL, surfing, browsing, encryption, encrypt, encrypted,
crypto, cryptography, cryptographic, SSL, usenet, news, newsgroup,
newsgroups, group, gateway, control, controls, IRC, helpdesk, trust,
trusted, trustworthy, worthy, reliable, censorship, freedom of speech,
pop, smtp, based, certificate, total, affordable, reliable, hidden,
hide, support, help, quality, blacklist, whitelist, whitelisting,
goldlist, goldlisting, block, pseudo, parental, content, banned,
vocabulary, aliases, unlimited, censorship, freedom of speech,
stunnel, ctunnel, tunneling, spyware, virus, worm, Trojan, pop3,
pop3s,
pop-ssl, smtp-ssl, popssl, smtpssl, cyberstalking, cyberstalkers,
identity theft, cyber-stalking, cyber-stalker">
| |
| Anonymous Sender 2007-06-25, 1:13 pm |
| Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> buthead@anomail.com wrote:
>
> assholes?, why do you have anonymous on your site you XXXXing scammers!
>
> At first I didn't believe you, I had to see this for myself. Could the
> revered cotse that haunts your dreams be guilty of blasphemy and worthy
> of scorn? If it was true it would shine a light on everything and give
> me a new perspective on why I should continue not to care. So I checked
> it out, using Tor of course, I wanted to be safe after seeing privacy
> services in action in here. After reading what their pages say I only
> can come to one conclusion, WTF are you smoking?
Wiener.
| |
| Caduceus 2007-07-29, 7:13 am |
| On Monday, 25 Jun 2007 07:43:26 -0600, buthead@anomail.com wrote:
>Privacy shield or Anonymous, both are on your web site. Which is it assholes?, why do you have anonymous on your site you XXXXing scammers!
> I thought no one can make you anonymous, especially you. LIARS
>
>
>
>d$IK[lc=WxAbXF#3419ymyTji+27(Sm`
I bet you have a chip on your shoulder against Steve Gielda for
something stupid you did.
|
|
|
|
|