|
Home > Archive > Anonymous Servers > September 2007 > Doctor Who -- Liar, Sock Puppet, Hypocrite, Incompetent Halfwit
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Doctor Who -- Liar, Sock Puppet, Hypocrite, Incompetent Halfwit
|
|
| Anonymous 2007-09-24, 7:14 am |
| The puppet "Doctor Who" claims someone else posted his messed up FAQ to
prove he's not simply unable to properly sign it himself...
----------cut----------
Message-ID: <v4v8f3tti98mnn6kougt0ikiru1aj5s9c3@4ax.com>
From: Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: Security and Encryption Faq - revision 22.6 - (US ASCII)
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:30:48 GMT
References: <iqm8f3daslejsl0ck2f059uvt3n41ba8sr@4ax.com> <3ecc4b388139bfc60c42d1db8ba42def@dizum.com>
Lines: 61
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:10:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>:Doctor Who wrote:
>:
>:> I regret following up my own post, but I realized after sending that
>:> you were trying to help.
>:
>:The key word being was.
>:
>:> However, as you (and others) who are having problems appear to be
>:> using GnuPG and I suspect Linux, then I have to say, it matters not a
>:> jot to me if you cannot verify it. The Faq is not intended for
>:
>:This is exactly why you are and always will be, scorned and ridiculed.
>:
>:Many thousands of people the world over don't have a single problem
>:signing their messages every day. Windows, Linux, GPG, PGP, makes not
>:one damned bit of difference to them, it just works. Even hacks like you
>:manage it most of the time.
You do - I have yet to see a single signed message from you. So just who
are you to point the finger, eh? From day one, when I first posted the Faq
you have been jumping up and down with joy at every minor thing you can
find to justify your spewing out sarcasm and bad temper.
>:The problem is OBVIOUSLY on your end. We even had a RemOp have the same
>:problem using Linux/GPG. An IDENTICAL problem.
If it is possible for my software to download and verify, why can't yours?
The answer is because your software is crooked. Not mine. As it happens the
Faq has just been reposted by another in ascii. If there is still a problem, then
if proves it is your end.
>:You're too dense to figure it out and too immature to accept help
>:from people who try to go out of their way to give it to you. Even
>:after you spend weeks flinging shit at them trying to cover up your
>:mistakes. You could have posted a link to an original just as easily as
>:you posted your diatribe, but you chose the latter. And why? Because
>:revolting sense of self worth would crumble under the strain of someone
>:actually fixing something you slopped your dripper all over.
>:
>:XXXX you Who. You'll have no peace here and your useless FAQ will
>:find no quarter. You've made brand new enemies with your childishness.
>:Enemies who actually tried to be at least civil to you in spite of
>:yourself. Enemies who formerly invested at least a couple hours
>:testing and trying to figure out what niggling little thing you've
>:overlooked in your FAQ that makes in unable to be verified by more
>:competent software than you're using to sign it, and people who know a
>:lot more than you ever will about PGP or anything else.
This drivel is more evidence of your foul temper. You are ill mannered,
uncouth and very mean spirited. I have been tolerating it for long
enough. It is your attitude that is ruining this group. Whatever my
failings (and I admit to many), I at least have the guts to sign and use
an attributable nic. You do not have either. You hide behind your
anonymous posts and scream verbal abuse at me and others who
do not kowtow to your requirments. Tough..
>:Have a real nice day loser.
The same to you.
----------cut----------
The puppet "Doctor Who" posts his FAQ as "Anon" after referencing the
post in a message where he takes one of his typically juvenile swipes
at anonymous posters. He inadvertently signs with his Doctor Who key
exposing his lies and hypocrisy...
----------cut----------
Message-ID: <miu8f3tg1j4eoeva9sn7uvmcnkvo3e89pa@4ax.com>
From: anon<non@non.com>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Security and Encryption Faq - Revision 22.6.1
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:17:21 GMT
Lines: 2151
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Security and Encryption FAQ - Revision 22.6.1
[...]
----------cut----------
The puppet "Doctor Who" forced to admit he's a liar and a nym hopping
troll...
----------cut----------
Message-ID: <6u4ef3hde7lbs9tqrvnn5nv6mg31klic42@4ax.com>
From: Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery>
Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
Subject: Re: Security and Encryption Faq - Revision 22.6.1
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:40:59 GMT
References: <miu8f3tg1j4eoeva9sn7uvmcnkvo3e89pa@4ax.com> <5b70f231f78fb39f3e3734f0043371ed@ecn.org>
Lines: 53
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
X-No-Archive: yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:11:01 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> wrote:
>:anon wrote:
>:
>:....a message signed with Who's key of all things.
>:
>:You're about as good as that kiddie XXXXer Eggfart at keeping your sock
>:puppets straight.
>:
>:Good news though. The signature was bad so you can claim someone cut
>:and pasted it from some other message or something.
>:
>:Idiot.
Hello Idiot, (interesting nic, but what the Hell, it's your choice)
Of course it was signed by my key. I also posted it. Are you the
only one allowed to post without a nic? Or rather you used to post
without one, but I see you have now chosen one for us to use.
What is truly interesting, is that the message was sent using plain
vanilla ascii. That's right, the one you kept on about. The one you
claimed would solve the problem. Well either your lying about the
bad sigs all along, or you have a problem at your end.
Sorry kiddo. It's really your problem. I can download and verify it,
as I have been able to do all along. Others have also been able to
verify it too. However, I notice that during all this time, you have
never once offerd us any insight into what OS and news reader you
are using. You would far rather just criticize instead of really helping.
Thus my total contempt for you, Idiot. Ah... yes, that nic does indeed
suit you well.
Doctor Who
PS This is also being sent in ascii.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
iQEVAwUBRvcVimToeXEUpganAQPg1Af/QpPF9E9GbNOvjYhS1/5SyWvHEITBHp+h
IfmjBLDteM/NhWx8WeO1TZEmTP6dQn4Keo2pm6s/MTncfqBSIeJ54b3r30tvKmIf
/Fvn7OLbO5PCLlYPSStyZNXz2eeiJVA+keqLG/zu4j9ygobbXAFw2mFcO+nZKYrv
cXfLV8CUGr39pqL5ugjnYIfqLYIlqviazmtkj65A
9VWGoe/g145VaJyBvMLeKW9R
nVKzfn2FOoGSb/pClzrgQuAc866/qUp1LkdBj1Vez1XSbCdvGRXbpASXkFgCWjK7
694I7e2UFGpdaUTz+vgrSN4tPMJuwu3ErJpMewVI
G/IwF04TYb8HLg==
=kTOo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------cut----------
| |
| Doctor Who 2007-09-24, 7:11 pm |
| On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:58:40 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org>
wrote:
>:The puppet "Doctor Who" claims someone else posted his messed up FAQ to
>:prove he's not simply unable to properly sign it himself...
>:
>:----------cut----------
>:Message-ID: <v4v8f3tti98mnn6kougt0ikiru1aj5s9c3@4ax.com>
>:From: Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery>
>:Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
>:Subject: Re: Security and Encryption Faq - revision 22.6 - (US ASCII)
>:Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:30:48 GMT
>:References: <iqm8f3daslejsl0ck2f059uvt3n41ba8sr@4ax.com> <3ecc4b388139bfc60c42d1db8ba42def@dizum.com>
>:Lines: 61
>:X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
>:X-No-Archive: yes
>:MIME-Version: 1.0
>:Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>:Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>:X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
>:Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
>:
>:On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 04:10:02 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>:
>:>:Doctor Who wrote:
>:>:
>:>:> I regret following up my own post, but I realized after sending that
>:>:> you were trying to help.
>:>:
>:>:The key word being was.
>:>:
>:>:> However, as you (and others) who are having problems appear to be
>:>:> using GnuPG and I suspect Linux, then I have to say, it matters not a
>:>:> jot to me if you cannot verify it. The Faq is not intended for
>:>:
>:>:This is exactly why you are and always will be, scorned and ridiculed.
>:>:
>:>:Many thousands of people the world over don't have a single problem
>:>:signing their messages every day. Windows, Linux, GPG, PGP, makes not
>:>:one damned bit of difference to them, it just works. Even hacks like you
>:>:manage it most of the time.
>:
>:You do - I have yet to see a single signed message from you. So just who
>:are you to point the finger, eh? From day one, when I first posted the Faq
>:you have been jumping up and down with joy at every minor thing you can
>:find to justify your spewing out sarcasm and bad temper.
>:
>:>:The problem is OBVIOUSLY on your end. We even had a RemOp have the same
>:>:problem using Linux/GPG. An IDENTICAL problem.
>:
>:If it is possible for my software to download and verify, why can't yours?
>:The answer is because your software is crooked. Not mine. As it happens the
>:Faq has just been reposted by another in ascii. If there is still a problem, then
>:if proves it is your end.
>:
>:>:You're too dense to figure it out and too immature to accept help
>:>:from people who try to go out of their way to give it to you. Even
>:>:after you spend weeks flinging shit at them trying to cover up your
>:>:mistakes. You could have posted a link to an original just as easily as
>:>:you posted your diatribe, but you chose the latter. And why? Because
>:>:revolting sense of self worth would crumble under the strain of someone
>:>:actually fixing something you slopped your dripper all over.
>:>:
>:>:XXXX you Who. You'll have no peace here and your useless FAQ will
>:>:find no quarter. You've made brand new enemies with your childishness.
>:>:Enemies who actually tried to be at least civil to you in spite of
>:>:yourself. Enemies who formerly invested at least a couple hours
>:>:testing and trying to figure out what niggling little thing you've
>:>:overlooked in your FAQ that makes in unable to be verified by more
>:>:competent software than you're using to sign it, and people who know a
>:>:lot more than you ever will about PGP or anything else.
>:
>:This drivel is more evidence of your foul temper. You are ill mannered,
>:uncouth and very mean spirited. I have been tolerating it for long
>:enough. It is your attitude that is ruining this group. Whatever my
>:failings (and I admit to many), I at least have the guts to sign and use
>:an attributable nic. You do not have either. You hide behind your
>:anonymous posts and scream verbal abuse at me and others who
>:do not kowtow to your requirments. Tough..
>:
>:>:Have a real nice day loser.
>:
>:The same to you.
>:----------cut----------
>:
>:The puppet "Doctor Who" posts his FAQ as "Anon" after referencing the
>:post in a message where he takes one of his typically juvenile swipes
>:at anonymous posters. He inadvertently signs with his Doctor Who key
>:exposing his lies and hypocrisy...
>:
>:----------cut----------
>:Message-ID: <miu8f3tg1j4eoeva9sn7uvmcnkvo3e89pa@4ax.com>
>:From: anon<non@non.com>
>:Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
>:Subject: Security and Encryption Faq - Revision 22.6.1
>:Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 02:17:21 GMT
>:Lines: 2151
>:X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
>:X-No-Archive: yes
>:MIME-Version: 1.0
>:Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>:Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>:X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
>:Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
>:
>:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:Hash: RIPEMD160
>:
>:Security and Encryption FAQ - Revision 22.6.1
>:[...]
>:----------cut----------
>:
>:The puppet "Doctor Who" forced to admit he's a liar and a nym hopping
>:troll...
>:
>:----------cut----------
>:Message-ID: <6u4ef3hde7lbs9tqrvnn5nv6mg31klic42@4ax.com>
>:From: Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery>
>:Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
>:Subject: Re: Security and Encryption Faq - Revision 22.6.1
>:Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:40:59 GMT
>:References: <miu8f3tg1j4eoeva9sn7uvmcnkvo3e89pa@4ax.com> <5b70f231f78fb39f3e3734f0043371ed@ecn.org>
>:Lines: 53
>:X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564
>:X-No-Archive: yes
>:MIME-Version: 1.0
>:Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>:Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>:X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
>:Organization: EasyNews, UseNet made Easy!
>:
>:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:Hash: RIPEMD160
>:
>:On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 23:11:01 +0200 (CEST), Anonymous <cripto@ecn.org> wrote:
>:
>:>:anon wrote:
>:>:
>:>:....a message signed with Who's key of all things.
>:>:
>:>:You're about as good as that kiddie XXXXer Eggfart at keeping your sock
>:>:puppets straight.
>:>:
>:>:Good news though. The signature was bad so you can claim someone cut
>:>:and pasted it from some other message or something.
>:>:
>:>:Idiot.
>:
>:Hello Idiot, (interesting nic, but what the Hell, it's your choice)
>:
>:Of course it was signed by my key. I also posted it. Are you the
>:only one allowed to post without a nic? Or rather you used to post
>:without one, but I see you have now chosen one for us to use.
>:
>:What is truly interesting, is that the message was sent using plain
>:vanilla ascii. That's right, the one you kept on about. The one you
>:claimed would solve the problem. Well either your lying about the
>:bad sigs all along, or you have a problem at your end.
>:
>:Sorry kiddo. It's really your problem. I can download and verify it,
>:as I have been able to do all along. Others have also been able to
>:verify it too. However, I notice that during all this time, you have
>:never once offerd us any insight into what OS and news reader you
>:are using. You would far rather just criticize instead of really helping.
>:
>:Thus my total contempt for you, Idiot. Ah... yes, that nic does indeed
>:suit you well.
>:
>:Doctor Who
>:
>:PS This is also being sent in ascii.
>:
>:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>:Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/
>:
>:iQEVAwUBRvcVimToeXEUpganAQPg1Af/QpPF9E9GbNOvjYhS1/5SyWvHEITBHp+h
>:IfmjBLDteM/NhWx8WeO1TZEmTP6dQn4Keo2pm6s/MTncfqBSIeJ54b3r30tvKmIf
>:/Fvn7OLbO5PCLlYPSStyZNXz2eeiJVA+keqLG/zu4j9ygobbXAFw2mFcO+nZKYrv
> :cXfLV8CUGr39pqL5ugjnYIfqLYIlqviazmtkj65
A9VWGoe/g145VaJyBvMLeKW9R
>:nVKzfn2FOoGSb/pClzrgQuAc866/qUp1LkdBj1Vez1XSbCdvGRXbpASXkFgCWjK7
> :694I7e2UFGpdaUTz+vgrSN4tPMJuwu3ErJpMewV
IG/IwF04TYb8HLg==
>:=kTOo
>:-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>:----------cut----------
Thank you.
Doctor Who
| |
|
|
|
|
|