Anonymous Servers - [INFO] Panta Rhei Remailer

Author

[INFO] Panta Rhei Remailer

panta-admin

2007-09-24, 7:14 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

This is periodic information about the services offered at the
Panta Rhei Remailer. It is posted to this newsgroup once a week.
This information was last updated on: 18.08.2007

STATS:
Download stats generated by the Panta Rhei Remailer here:

Cpunk Stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/rlist2.txt
Cpunk Chain stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/rchain.txt
Cpunk Keys URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/allkeys.txt
Mix Stats URL:
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/stats/mlist2.html
Type2.list ; Pubring.mix
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/type2.lis ;
http://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/stats/pubring.mix

These statistics are also posted daily to
alt.privacy.anon-server.stats

OPEN PORTS:
Panta Rhei can receive TLS and SMTP on ports 25 and 2525
and TLS only on ports 465 and 587.

HIDDEN SERVICE:
There is now a hidden service inside the TOR network on:

rjgcfnw4sd2jaqfu.onion port 25 connects to Panta SMTP server
rjgcfnw4sd2jaqfu.onion port 119 connects to Panta NEWS server

NYMSERVER:
The nymserver at Panta Rhei is at nym.panta-rhei.eu.org
Send email to remailer-key@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org for the keys.
Config messages have to be sent to config@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org.
Get a list of used nym acount names by sending email to
list@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org

The Nymserver at Panta Rhei uses the PERL script from sourceforge.
It is modified to allow the use of both RSA and DH/DSS keys.

MAIL2NEWS
The mail2news gateway at Panta Rhei can be found at
mail2news-hashcash AT panta-rhei.eu.org and
mail2news-hashcash_nospam AT panta-rhei.eu.org

POSTING RULES
To avoid spamming and flooding of newsgroups the Panta Rhei Remailer
enforces a hashcash requirement for all postings via the remailer
and the mail2news gateway. There is a size limit of 30kb, all
messages exceeding the limit are silently dropped.

To post to any group other than alt.anonymous.messages and alt.test
you have to include a hashcash token minted to the following
requirements:
Bits: 27
Resource: panta-rhei
Tokens are valid for 60 days from creation.

More information about hashcash can be found at www.hashcash.org.
A simple minter for win32 can be downloaded at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/downloads/
Alternatively you can use the Panta JBN mod which includes the
hashcash minter.

Panta Rhei Remailer Keys:

Admin
DSA: 0xA6A032C8, 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B2 DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
RSA: 0xB2FD58C5, 918F 1651 5577 BD8B 7D34 26F3 6829 759A

Remailer
DSA: 0xA2D16A64, C77F D098 D3BC 0731 C042 171E 2AFD 0DBE A2D1 6A64
RSA: 0xB7D44BAD, 7B0A 01ED E82A 76E3 30F1 E228 CAC1 B4C6

Nymserver
DSA: 0xD7ECC0F5, D883 09B0 CD5A 8BCC 172E 5ED6 B8A5 C994 D7EC C0F5
RSA: 0xC376A879, 4875 5573 FA58 E5A8 4332 CB1A 8FA2 D08C

THESAURUS
You can find a collection of remailer-x replies from many remailers at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/thesaurus/Thesaurus.html

NEWSGROUPS
You can read on-topic newsgroups directly in your browser at
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/news/

I currently carry alt.privacy.anon-server and a few other newsgroups.
If you want something added just ask.

WIKI
There is now a WiKi on the Panta Rhei website which will hopefully
contain a lot of information soon.
The WiKi is here: https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/pantawiki
If you have anything to contribute, please do not hesitate to edit it.

TOOLS
Download privacy software from the Panta Rhei Remailer.
You will find PGP 6.5.8ckt which is one of the most trusted PGP versions
available. You can also download JBN2 which is a very convenient remailer
client. The help files for JBN2 and an enhanced version of JBN2 are also
available.
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/downloads/

More information can be found on the Panta Rhei Remailer homepage at:
https://www.panta-rhei.eu.org/

I hope you find the Panta Rhei Remailer useful,
If you have suggestions do not hesitate to contact me,
Cheers,
panta-admin
admin at panta-rhei dot eu dot org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQA/ AwUBRsbb3tcrLUqmoDLIEQIR0QCbB+h5FUqHhIQR
BDiE1+zqmReOexoAoL4n
C0vupZKCBvmhb5MzJC225ojI
=eQUi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Anonymous

2007-09-24, 7:14 am

panta-admin wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

<snip>

Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>"
aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.org>"
Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8

Doctor Who

2007-09-24, 7:11 pm

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous)
wrote:

>:panta-admin wrote:
>:
>:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> Hash: SHA1
>:
>:<snip>
>:
>:Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>"
>: aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.org>"
>:Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8

========================================
=======

Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:

***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
<admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B2 DD9A D72B
2D4A A6A0 32C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the vilification I have
had to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced (and very well
respected) remop has a problem. Now it only needs one (anyone) to find it _does_
verify and we are back at square one.

I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own boundaries, but it
does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology to this group
in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.

Let us see if he is man enough.

Doctor Who

Doctor Who

2007-09-24, 7:11 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous)
wrote:

>:panta-admin wrote:
>:
>:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> Hash: SHA1
>:
>:<snip>
>:
>:Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
><admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>" : aka "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
>23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.org>" :Primary key fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8

========================================
=======

Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:

***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
<admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B2 DD9A D72B
2D4A A6A0 32C8
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the vilification I
have had to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced (and very
well
respected) remop has a problem. Now it only needs one (anyone) to find it _does_
verify and we are back at square one.

I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own boundaries, but it
does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology to this group
in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.

Let us see if he is man enough.

Doctor Who

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.ipgpp.com/

iQEVAwUBRvg6fGToeXEUpganAQMX+gf8DDNYqnKn
+fHMc7Sfn5sMwEUxdwIvUryt
njWlcWaphnTLSzL9R8P+GQHeOXIsGnglw2eCljzu
k1YOGGCrtvGte5gjv1xVmlZr
gvM4eDDULLOIdFEiMQIIIqRsYCmu320KsnfBSOuo
cuIZlxZjKcm8R52cBOzzdKg/
6FCq4mbD+lyXWPK0TQFC1CmD1a7OS/sT5RD5Yg5G0LGb9rYMDPxAiRWUFKoBja1Y
PRnUCJjWpnVWwD+2nkvNFpr9atW6IAwmSKUm0Zpb
QQzXuk2ZH2P9aH0Wf5OX4plt
sNxkOP0cDW+v3oRl874ljh5OjSsK8clCFYkZp5Qk
IezJO/b2ghgg2g==
=eTCB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

2007-09-24, 7:11 pm

Doctor Who wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST),
> nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous) wrote:
>
>
> ========================================
=======
>
> Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:
>
>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
> 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553
> A8B2 DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
> There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
> vilification I have had to put up with from some,

You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.

You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.

That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.

Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer

2007-09-25, 1:13 am

Doctor Who wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST),
> nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous) wrote:
>
>
> ========================================
=======
>
> Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:
>
>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
> 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553
> A8B2 DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
> There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
> vilification I have had to put up with from some, it now appears
> that even an experienced (and very well
> respected) remop has a problem. Now it only needs one (anyone) to
> find it _does_ verify and we are back at square one.
>
> I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own
> boundaries, but it does suggest that at least one individual should
> offer a profound apology to this group in general and to me in
> particular for all the time he has wasted.
>
> Let us see if he is man enough.
>
> Doctor Who

Nobody ever said it was just you lying sock puppet. Everyone plainly
said there's some very common things that cause sigs to fail. You're
guilty of at least one of them. So is Panta. 20 to 1 odds he'll be man
enough to do something constructive about it instead of wasting weeks
acting like an immature little brat and nymhopping to make it look like
someone supports his childish bullshit.

Anonymous

2007-09-25, 1:13 am

Doctor Who wrote:

> There is more going on here than any of us understand.

No there isn't. Only you are confused and too childish to figure out
what your problem is. Only you are playing sock puppet games to make it
look like someone agrees with you. Everyone else realizes that
cleartext signatures need to be used on plain text only and break if
htere's any oddness in that text.

Nomen Nescio

2007-09-25, 1:13 am

Anonymous Remailer (austria) wrote:

>
> Doctor Who wrote:
>
>
> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>
> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.

I don't know where the little creep gets off saying people don't
understand things. There's some pretty common causes of broken PGP
signatures in messages, and if we saw the original text before it's
signed it's s sure bet someone would spot the cause pretty quick.

But the coward couldn't keep yapping about understanding and pretending
everyone is as stupid as he is if he did that, so it will never happen.

>
> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.
>

Not like that was any sort of accomplishment. You could have put his
credibility in a thimble and still had room for a thimble full of
something useful. ;)

Anonymous Sender

2007-09-25, 1:13 am

In article < eb2baba60f3b74ebb56c5c7b5223935f@remaile
r.privacy.at>
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>
>
> Doctor Who wrote:
>
> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>
> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.
>
> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.

I hope one day both of you come to realize how little the rest of us gives
a shit about any of this.

Anonymous via Panta Rhei

2007-09-25, 7:14 am

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote:
>On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST), nobody@remailer.paranoici.org
>(Anonymous)
>wrote:
>
>
> ========================================
=======
>
>Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:
>
>
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
><admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553 A8B2
>DD9A D72B
>2D4A A6A0 32C8
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
>***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
>There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
>vilification I have
>had to put up with from some, it now appears that even an experienced
>(and very well
>respected) remop has a problem. Now it only needs one (anyone) to find
>it _does_
>verify and we are back at square one.
>
>I take no satisfaction in finding this problem extends beyond my own
>boundaries, but it
>does suggest that at least one individual should offer a profound apology
>to this group
>in general and to me in particular for all the time he has wasted.
>
>Let us see if he is man enough.
>
>Doctor Who

I don't think there's a comparison here. Panta's message didn't have any
funky encoding, note the headers:

Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server
Date: 24 Sep 2007 07:04:29 -0000
Organization: remailer network
Message-ID: <1VMDALJ439349.3781134259@anonymous.poster>
From: panta-admin <admin at panta-rhei DOT dyndns DOT org>
Subject: [INFO] Panta Rhei Remailer
Comments: Remailed message. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org for abuse info.
X-Remailer-Contact: admin@panta-rhei.eu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: news.panta-rhei.eu.org 1190617469 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2007
09:04:29+0200)
Lines: 132
Path: authen.puce.readfreenews.net!green.octanews.net!news-out.octan
ews.net!news.glorb.com!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.defeeder.erje.ne
tnews2.arglkargh.de!news.panta-rhei.eu.org!not-for-mail
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.eu.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

Doctor Who

2007-09-26, 7:11 pm

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:11:00 +0200 (CEST), "Anonymous Remailer (austria)"
<mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:

>:
>:Doctor Who wrote:
>:
>:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> Hash: RIPEMD160
>:>
>:> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:13:44 +0200 (CEST),
>:> nobody@remailer.paranoici.org (Anonymous) wrote:
>:>
>:> >:panta-admin wrote:
>:> >:
>:> >:> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>:> >:> Hash: SHA1
>:> >:
>:> >:<snip>
>:> >:
>:> >:Signature made using DSA key ID D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:> >:BAD signature from "Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires 23.02.2008]
>:> ><admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>" : aka "Panta Rhei Admin
>:> >DSS [Expires 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.dyndns.org>" :Primary key
>:> >fingerprint: D72B2D4AA6A032C8
>:>
>:> ========================================
=======
>:>
>:> Very interesting and strange. I also get a bad sig:
>:>
>:>
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] PGP Signature Status: bad
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Hash: SHA1
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer: Panta Rhei Admin DSS [Expires
>:> 23.02.2008] <admin@panta-rhei.eu.org>
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key ID: 0xA6A032C8
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Fingerprint: 1C9D 5E66 02FF 3553
>:> A8B2 DD9A D72B 2D4A A6A0 32C8
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signer Key Status: Invalid
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Signed: 18/08/2007 12:45:34
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] Verified: 24/09/2007 23:21:41
>:> ***[24/09/2007 23:21:41] BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>:>
>:> There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
>:> vilification I have had to put up with from some,
>:
>:You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>:
>:You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
>:attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
>:afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.
>:
>:That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.

Troll

Doctor Who

2007-09-26, 7:11 pm

On 25 Sep 2007 03:03:24 +0200, Cyberiade.it Anonymous Remailer
<anonymous@remailer.cyberiade.it> wrote:
Troll

Doctor Who

2007-09-26, 7:11 pm

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:

>:In article < eb2baba60f3b74ebb56c5c7b5223935f@remaile
r.privacy.at>
>:"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>:>
>:>
>:> Doctor Who wrote:
>:> >
>:> > There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
>:> > vilification I have had to put up with from some,
>:>
>:> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>:>
>:> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
>:> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
>:> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.
>:>
>:> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.
>:
>:I hope one day both of you come to realize how little the rest of us gives
>:a shit about any of this.

I am truly sorry for all this trash. But as my work was attacked I felt the need to
defend myself. I now realize I was dealing with a troll. I will not be responding
further to him. Panta's sig error was proof of his nefarious disingenuity when he
couldn't apologize for his previous postings about my sig error. On the contrary
he tried to continue his trolling. I suspect he is the same one who continues to
plague the group with his anti-traveler 66 postings. He has a serious
psychocological problem. I suspect he is on some medication and is only taking
it haphazardly.

Fritz Wuehler

2007-09-27, 1:15 pm

On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:22:14 +0100, Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote:

>:On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
>:<anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>:
>:>:In article < eb2baba60f3b74ebb56c5c7b5223935f@remaile
r.privacy.at>
>:>:"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> wrote:
>:>:>
>:>:>
>:>:> Doctor Who wrote:
>:>:> >
>:>:> > There is more going on here than any of us understand. After all the
>:>:> > vilification I have had to put up with from some,
>:>:>
>:>:> You brought all that on yourself. You deserve it.
>:>:>
>:>:> You CAN post text that verifies just like anyone else can if they pay
>:>:> attention to what they're doing. YOU just won't do it becaue you're
>:>:> afraid to admit it's something in your FAQ text.
>:>:>
>:>:> That and your kiddie games have killed what little credibility you had.
>:>:
>:>:I hope one day both of you come to realize how little the rest of us gives
>:>:a shit about any of this.
>:
>:I am truly sorry for all this trash. But as my work was attacked I felt the need to
>:defend myself. I now realize I was dealing with a troll. I will not be responding
>:further to him. Panta's sig error was proof of his nefarious disingenuity when he
>:couldn't apologize for his previous postings about my sig error. On the contrary
>:he tried to continue his trolling. I suspect he is the same one who continues to
>:plague the group with his anti-traveler 66 postings. He has a serious
>:psychocological problem. I suspect he is on some medication and is only taking
>:it haphazardly.
>:
>:
>:

Yeah sorry, right, we believe you. As for your snide comments about my medication
you can STFU! Because people sometimes need medication is not reason for you to
try and be clever. I admit I have been on medication but these things cost money
so I sometimes leave it out. I am not XXXXing apologizing to you or anybody else
Who. You can sort your XXXXing sig problem out yourself I'm through with you.

Anonymous

2007-09-27, 1:15 pm

Fritz Wuehler wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:22:14 +0100, Doctor Who
> <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah sorry, right, we believe you. As for your snide comments about
> my medication you can STFU! Because people sometimes need medication
> is not reason for you to try and be clever. I admit I have been on
> medication but these things cost money so I sometimes leave it out.
> I am not XXXXing apologizing to you or anybody else Who. You can
> sort your XXXXing sig problem out yourself I'm through with you.

Uh, Doc... if you're going to play kiddie sock puppet games you might
want to at least leave the colon out of your quotemarks.

*snicker*

So much for you holding the "done with it" moral high ground. You've
obviously been so embarrassed your bruised ego isn't going let you stop
making a fool of yourself any time soon.

By the way, I see your post carries a certain number of blank lines.
The same number of blank lines as your quoted text, minus the
attributions. That's not an uncommon pattern at all to anyone whose
been paying attention.

Are you responsible for even more sock puppetry than you've made a fool
of yourself with recently?

Apparently so.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Non scrivetemi

2007-09-27, 7:14 pm

Fritz Wuehler wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:22:14 +0100, Doctor Who <doctorwho@his.surgery> wrote:
>
>
> Yeah sorry, right, we believe you. As for your snide comments about my medication
> you can STFU! Because people sometimes need medication is not reason for you to
> try and be clever. I admit I have been on medication but these things cost money
> so I sometimes leave it out. I am not XXXXing apologizing to you or anybody else
> Who. You can sort your XXXXing sig problem out yourself I'm through with you.

Sorry to bust you being a nym hopping troll again Who, but you're so
damned stupid you even answered your own post pretending to be someone
else using the same long, unwrapped lines you used in the post you were
answering. The same EXACT line length you've used in previous posts. Go
ahead and count characters. Wrapping at 85. Look back through this
thread and you'll see someone already commented on it.

Not to mention the bizarre >: quote string you've even used for several
messages in this sub-thread. Signed messages even. <laughing>

You talk about other people having mental problems? Look in the mirror
pal. Something definitely is not not right with you. Normal people don't
act the way you do and play the silly games you do because they can't
just XXXXing admit there's some minor anomaly in a text file that's
causing their PGP signature to not verify properly. Seriously. It's
absolutely insane that you'd go through all this bullshit for something
so utterly common and inconsequential, and generally easy to fix. Get
some help already.

George Orwell

2007-09-27, 7:14 pm

Anonymous wrote:

> Fritz Wuehler wrote:
>
>
> Uh, Doc... if you're going to play kiddie sock puppet games you might
> want to at least leave the colon out of your quotemarks.

ROTFLMAO!!!

What a XXXXing IDIOT. Twice in one week........ B-U-S-T-E-D!

LOL! LOL!

>
> *snicker*
>
> So much for you holding the "done with it" moral high ground. You've
> obviously been so embarrassed your bruised ego isn't going let you stop
> making a fool of yourself any time soon.
>
> By the way, I see your post carries a certain number of blank lines.
> The same number of blank lines as your quoted text, minus the
> attributions. That's not an uncommon pattern at all to anyone whose
> been paying attention.
>
> Are you responsible for even more sock puppetry than you've made a fool
> of yourself with recently?
>
> Apparently so.

>
>

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Non scrivetemi

2007-09-27, 7:14 pm

Anonymous wrote:

> Uh, Doc... if you're going to play kiddie sock puppet games you might
> want to at least leave the colon out of your quotemarks.
>
> *snicker*

Snicker indeed.

That's twice now in the last 10 days our friend the
Doctor has been caught red handed doing exactly what he accuses
everyone else of doing. By making mistakes that are a bit less than
confidence inspiring.

At least it's clear now exactly who it is doing all the nym shifting to
paint a false picture of solidarity. Aside from Boschaloon he's out on
a limb, and let's face facts, an autofisting freakshow isn't exactly a
whole lot of help.

The poor slob is desperate. He knows damned well his so called "FAQ" is
a piece of junk, but he's incapable of letting go of the childish
bullshit and fixing it. So he's reduced to this pathetic game of
hopping from nym to nym pretending to be some sort of collective.

Except he's not very good at it, now is he? ;)

> By the way, I see your post carries a certain number of blank lines.
> The same number of blank lines as your quoted text, minus the
> attributions.

Hmmmmm...

Anonymous

2007-09-27, 7:14 pm

Non scrivetemi wrote:
> Seriously. It's
> absolutely insane that you'd go through all this bullshit for something
> so utterly common and inconsequential, and generally easy to fix. Get
> some help already.
>
I don't understand why so many messages have harped on this
inconsequential problem. Serious people would have dropped
the subject a long time ago. It has been a big help in making a
laughingstock out of this group.

Non scrivetemi

2007-09-28, 7:13 am

Doctor Who wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 01:05:06 +0000 (UTC), Anonymous Sender
> <anonymous@remailer.metacolo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I am truly sorry for all this trash. But as my work was attacked I
> felt the need to defend myself. I now realize I was dealing with a

So when are you going to start defending yourself? All we've seen so
far is denial, lies, accusations, and you making an XXX of yourself by
being caught red handed doing the exact same thing you claim everyone
else is doing to you.

> troll. I will not be responding further to him. Panta's sig error

Heard that song and dance routine before.

Why not stick to it this time. The world would be a lot better place if
we could intelligently dissect your stupidity without having to listen
to you whine like a XXXXX about it.

> was proof of his nefarious disingenuity when he couldn't apologize
> for his previous postings about my sig error. On the contrary he

There's nothing to apologize for. You made mistakes, Panta Admin made
mistakes, his will get corrected and you'll act like a cunt. Clear
signing text messages is a tenuous proposition to begin with. Your
denials and kiddie games don't mean your mistakes don't exist though
dumbass, they mean you're nothing but a child who can't own up to even
the most inconsequential of his mistakes.

> tried to continue his trolling. I suspect he is the same one who
> continues to plague the group with his anti-traveler 66 postings.
> He has a serious psychocological problem. I suspect he is on some
> medication and is only taking it haphazardly.

Of course. When thoroughtly defeated, beaten into a corner by your own
stupidity, run like a coward and scream "everyone is the same person"
over your shoulder. When everyone can now plainly see who the puppet
master is here. Isn't that right, "Anon"?

<snicker>

You're as pathetic as they come. But at least we won't have to listen to
your endless weeks of gross ignorance and childish prattle any more,
right? We can help the noobs avoid your incompetence and set them on the
right path without your incessant braying about how much you're being
picked on and your not so sneaky nym shifting tomfoolery, correct?

Game/set/match as far as I'm concerned. The only way it might have
worked out better is if you actually grew a pair and managed something
constructive, but we'll settle for you shutting the XXXX up. :-)

George Orwell

2007-09-28, 7:13 am

Eelbash wrote:

> I don't understand why so many messages have harped on this
> inconsequential problem. Serious people would have dropped
> the subject a long time ago. It has been a big help in making a
> laughingstock out of this group.

Talking of people who can't seem to post without outing themselves...
Hi there eel!

Unfortunately Dr Who is the one making a big deal about it. Originally
people politely posted just to let him know his sig didn't verify, and
then he went on this big crusade about how its everyone elses problem.

Then he vented all his anger and insults through sock puppets, a
situation you are no doubt familiar with having done the same thing
yourself.

Nobody actually cares much, he should just drop it.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it

Anonymous Sender

2007-09-28, 7:12 pm

George Orwell wrote:

> Eelbash wrote:
>
>
> Talking of people who can't seem to post without outing themselves...
> Hi there eel!
>
> Unfortunately Dr Who is the one making a big deal about it. Originally
> people politely posted just to let him know his sig didn't verify, and
> then he went on this big crusade about how its everyone elses problem.
>
> Then he vented all his anger and insults through sock puppets, a
> situation you are no doubt familiar with having done the same thing
> yourself.
>
> Nobody actually cares much, he should just drop it.

What he *should* do is be more forthcoming, and allow others to help
him figure out what's preventing some people from verifying the
signature on his FAQ. It's obviously a concern to *him*, in fact that
very same signature was one of his main complaints against Privacy.LIE.

Anonymous Remailer (austria)

2007-09-29, 1:22 am

George Orwell wrote:

> Eelbash wrote:
>
>
> Talking of people who can't seem to post without outing themselves...
> Hi there eel!

LOL!

I'll bet the poor dummy still hasn't figured it out. ;-)