Apache Mod-Python - Commented: (MODPYTHON-77) The multiple interpreter concept of mod_python is broken for

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache Mod-Python > September 2005 > Commented: (MODPYTHON-77) The multiple interpreter concept of mod_python is broken for





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Commented: (MODPYTHON-77) The multiple interpreter concept of mod_python is broken for
Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)

2005-09-02, 5:51 pm

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12320920 ]

Nicolas Lehuen commented on MODPYTHON-77:
-----------------------------------------

OK, I've tested your patch against the unit tests, and everything works correctly. I could check this is but I'm not quite sure to understand what it does precisely. I'll read the PEP to learn a bit more about the problem first. Meanwhile, if someone else
wants to +1 the patch, feel free !

> The multiple interpreter concept of mod_python is broken for Python extension modules since Python 2.3
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-77
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-77
> Project: mod_python
> Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Versions: 3.1.4
> Environment: Python >= 2.3
> Reporter: Boyan Boyadjiev
> Attachments: diff.txt, diff2.txt, diff3.txt, mod_python.c
>
> The multiple interpreter concept of mod_python is broken for Python extension modules since Python 2.3 because of the PEP 311 (Simplified Global Interpreter Lock Acquisition for Extensions):
> ...
> Limitations and Exclusions
> This proposal identifies a solution for extension authors with
> complex multi-threaded requirements, but that only require a
> single "PyInterpreterState". There is no attempt to cater for
> extensions that require multiple interpreter states. At the time
> of writing, no extension has been identified that requires
> multiple PyInterpreterStates, and indeed it is not clear if that
> facility works correctly in Python itself.
> ...
> For mod_python this means, that complex Python extensions won't work any more with Python >= 2.3, because they are supposed to work only with the first interpreter state initialized for the current process (a problem we experienced). The first interpret

er state is not used by mod_python after the python_init is called.
> One solution, which works fine for me, is to save the first interpreter state into the "interpreters" dictionary in the function python_init (MAIN_INTERPRETER is used as a key):
> static int python_init(apr_pool_t *p, apr_pool_t *ptemp,
> apr_pool_t *plog, server_rec *s)
> {
> ...
> /* initialize global Python interpreter if necessary */
> if (! Py_IsInitialized())
> {
> /* initialze the interpreter */
> Py_Initialize();
> #ifdef WITH_THREAD
> /* create and acquire the interpreter lock */
> PyEval_InitThreads();
> #endif
> /* create the obCallBack dictionary */
> interpreters = PyDict_New();
> if (! interpreters) {
> ap_log_error(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_NOERRNO|APLOG_ERR, 0, s,
> "python_init: PyDict_New() failed! No more memory?");
> exit(1);
> }
> {
> /*
> Workaround PEP 311 - Simplified Global Interpreter Lock Acquisition for Extensions
> BEGIN
> */
> PyObject *p = 0;
> interpreterdata * idata = (interpreterdata *)malloc(sizeof(interpreterdata));
> PyThreadState* currentThreadState = PyThreadState_Get();
> PyInterpreterState *istate = currentThreadState->interp;
> idata->istate = istate;
> /* obcallback will be created on first use */
> idata->obcallback = NULL;
> p = PyCObject_FromVoidPtr((void ) idata, NULL); /*p->refcout = 1*/
> PyDict_SetItemString(interpreters, MAIN_INTERPRETER, p); /*p->refcout = 2*/
> Py_DECREF(p); /*p->refcout = 1*/
> /*
> END
> Workaround PEP 311 - Simplified Global Interpreter Lock Acquisition for Extensions
> */
> }
> /* Release the thread state because we will never use
> * the main interpreter, only sub interpreters created later. */
> PyThreadState_Swap(NULL);
> #ifdef WITH_THREAD
> /* release the lock; now other threads can run */
> PyEval_ReleaseLock();
> #endif
> }
> return OK;
> }
> Another change I've made in the attached file is to Py_DECREF(p) in get_interpreter, which will remove leaky reference to the PyCObject with the interpreter data. This was not a real problem, but now I see fewer leaks in BoundsChecker :-).


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com