Apache Mod-Python - Commented: (MODPYTHON-93) Improve util.FieldStorage

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache Mod-Python > March 2006 > Commented: (MODPYTHON-93) Improve util.FieldStorage





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Commented: (MODPYTHON-93) Improve util.FieldStorage
Jim Gallacher (JIRA)

2006-03-21, 2:52 am

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12370996 ]

Jim Gallacher commented on MODPYTHON-93:
----------------------------------------

I was checking the documentation with respect to this patch and I noticed a couple of things.

The FieldStorage constructor has 2 undocumented parameters, file_callback=None, field_callback=None. These were added in r160259 as part of Barry Pearce's fix for MODPYTHON-40. In the same patch, the make_file and make_field methods were added. These all
ow FieldStorage to be subclassed and provide an alternative to using the callbacks.

In Mike's modpython325_util_py_dict.patch, the make_field and make_file methods have be removed, with the reasoning that the callbacks should be sufficient for controlling the upload.

We never had a discussion of the merits of the 2 approaches - subclassing vs passing the callbacks in the FieldStorage constructor. Should we perhaps allow both, and reinstate make_field and make_file, or are the callbacks sufficient?

Further infomation on the callbacks, including some nice examples, can be found in the python-dev archives. See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp...ython.devel/760

I'll update the docs as part of the fix for this issue.

> Improve util.FieldStorage efficiency
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-93
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-93
> Project: mod_python
> Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Versions: 3.2.7
> Reporter: Jim Gallacher
> Assignee: Jim Gallacher
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.3
> Attachments: modpython325_util_py_dict.patch
>
> Form fields are saved as a list in a FieldStorage class instance. The class implements a __getitem__ method to provide dict-like behaviour. This method iterates over the complete list for every call to __getitem__. Applications that need to access all

the fields when processing the form will show O(n^2) behaviour where n == the number of form fields. This overhead could be avoided by creating a dict (to use as an index) when the FieldStorage instance is created.
> Mike Looijmans has been investigating StringField and Field as well. It is probably reasonable to include information on his work in this issue as well, so that we can consider all of these efficiency issues in toto.


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com