| Graham Dumpleton (JIRA) 2006-03-25, 9:49 am |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12371703 ]
Graham Dumpleton commented on MODPYTHON-146:
--------------------------------------------
In addition to the sub request Python request object being ignored, the ap_internal_fast_redirect() also doesn't transfer anything held in the sub request req->request_config attribute. As well as holding the Python request object, this holds information
about dynamically registered handlers and input/output filters. Thus the specifics of handlers and input/output filters registered by the sub request are lost.
> ap_internal_fast_redirect() and request object cache
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MODPYTHON-146
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-146
> Project: mod_python
> Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Versions: 3.2.8
> Reporter: Graham Dumpleton
> Assignee: Graham Dumpleton
>
> mod_python uses a Python class to wrap the Apache request_rec structure. The primary purpose of the request object wrapper is to access the request_rec internals. One of the other features of the request object wrapper is that handlers can add their own
attributes to it, to facilitate communication of information between handlers. This communication of information between handlers works because a handler will lookup to see if a request object has already been created for the request as a whole before cr
eating a fresh request object wrapper, and will use the existing one instead.
> All in all this generally works okay, however, the DirectoryIndex directive and the ap_internal_fast_redirect() do cause undesirable behaviour in specific cases.
> Now when a request is made against a directory, this is detected by mod_dir, which in a LAST hooked handler in the fixup handler phase, will use ap_internal_fast_redirect() to determine if any of the files mentioned in the DirectoryIndex directive exist
. What this function does is run through all request phases up to and including the fixup handler phase for the file which would be matched for the entry in DirectoryIndex. If the status comes back OK indicating the request could be satisfied, it copies a
ll the information from the sub request request_rec structure into the parent request_rec structure. It will then proceed with this information to execute the content handler phase.
> The problem is that ap_internal_fast_redirect() knows only about the request_rec structure and nothing about the Python request object wrapper. As a consequence, the request object created for the sub request which worked and ran through to the fixup ha
ndler phase is being ignored and that originally created for the parent request continues to be used. As a consequence, any of the attributes added by handler phases up to and including the fixup handler are lost.
> What possibly needs to be done is that the get_request_object() function in mod_python needs to add to req->notes a tag which identifies the instance of the request object which has been created. Because req->notes will be overlayed by the notes table c
ontents from the sub request, it will be able to detect when this copy of sub request data into the parent has occured. It can then decide to switch to the request object created for the sub request, updating the request_rec member to point to the parent
request_rec instead.
> What may also come out of of storing an id for a request object in the req->notes table is that when an internal redirect occurs, instead of a fresh request object wrapper instance being created to use for the req.main attribute, it can use the id in re
q->notes to actually get hold of the real request object of the parent and chain to it properly. Doing this will mean then that a sub request will be able to access attributes added into a request object of the parent request, something which can't curren
tly be done.
> Now, if you understand everything I have said above, you have done well. ;-)
> Depending on whether people do understand or not, when I get a chance I'll try and attach some examples of handlers which demonstrate he problem.
> Acknowledgements that you understand the issue appreciated.
|