|
Home > Archive > Apache Mod-Python > April 2006 > Progressing 3.2.9.
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Progressing 3.2.9.
|
|
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-10, 6:58 pm |
| Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> WRT to 3.2.9, I've been bogged down with other stuff and will likely be
> fairly busy this week as well. How be we aim for a release somewhere
> around April 22? I'd like to sort out why the apache 2.2 auth test fails
> on some platforms before the release. It's a defect in the test I'm
> sure, but I don't think we should make a release when failing tests.
In terms of the list we drew up, what still needs to be done? Has
anything new come up since that we should also consider?
I can help progress things a bit, although stuff like these logging
additions would prefer someone else to do purely so they get reviewed by
someone else in the process to ensure I didn't stuff up.
BTW, you don't happen to have a reference to the Apache 2.2 auth test
failures to save me tracking it down in the archive do you. :-)
Graham
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-11, 8:01 am |
| Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
> Jim Gallacher wrote ..
> be
>
> In terms of the list we drew up, what still needs to be done? Has
> anything new come up since that we should also consider?
>
> I can help progress things a bit, although stuff like these logging
> additions would prefer someone else to do purely so they get reviewed by
> someone else in the process to ensure I didn't stuff up.
>
> BTW, you don't happen to have a reference to the Apache 2.2 auth test
> failures to save me tracking it down in the archive do you. :-)
All I can find from previous 3.3 snapshot testing on Apache 2.2
auth problems was:
http://www.mail-archive.com/python-...g/msg01703.html
Specifically:
[Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [warn] mod_python
(pid=5140,interpreter='test_req_auth_typ
e'): Module directory listed
in "sys.path". This may cause problems. Please check code. Code file
being imported is " C:\\projets\\mod_python\\test\\htdocs\\t
ests.py".
[Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [notice] mod_python
(pid=5140,interpreter='test_req_auth_typ
e'): Importing module
'C:\\projets\\mod_python\\test\\htdocs\\
tests.py'
[Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [crit] [client 127.0.0.1] configuration
error: couldn't check access. No groups file?: /tests.py
[Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] No Authn
provider configured
Nicolas, what is the latest on this, I couldn't see any followup to
say it had been resolved as a configuration issue or otherwise.
The "No Authn provider configured" error almost suggests Apache
can't load up separate Apache 2.2 auth provider modules and that
it is getting itself in a know over that.
Graham
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-04-11, 8:01 am |
| Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote ..
>
>
>
> All I can find from previous 3.3 snapshot testing on Apache 2.2
> auth problems was:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/python-...g/msg01703.html
>
> Specifically:
>
> [Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [warn] mod_python
> (pid=5140,interpreter='test_req_auth_typ
e'): Module directory listed
> in "sys.path". This may cause problems. Please check code. Code file
> being imported is " C:\\projets\\mod_python\\test\\htdocs\\t
ests.py".
> [Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [notice] mod_python
> (pid=5140,interpreter='test_req_auth_typ
e'): Importing module
> 'C:\\projets\\mod_python\\test\\htdocs\\
tests.py'
> [Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [crit] [client 127.0.0.1] configuration
> error: couldn't check access. No groups file?: /tests.py
> [Wed Mar 22 07:16:03 2006] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] No Authn
> provider configured
>
> Nicolas, what is the latest on this, I couldn't see any followup to
> say it had been resolved as a configuration issue or otherwise.
>
> The "No Authn provider configured" error almost suggests Apache
> can't load up separate Apache 2.2 auth provider modules and that
> it is getting itself in a know over that.
>
Same thread, similar problem from Jorey on Slackware 10.1.
http://www.mail-archive.com/python-...g/msg01710.html
There was some back and forth, it looked like Jorey had all the correct
modules but no resolution.
Jim
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-04-11, 8:01 am |
| Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Jim Gallacher wrote ..
>
>
>
> In terms of the list we drew up, what still needs to be done? Has
> anything new come up since that we should also consider?
>
> I can help progress things a bit, although stuff like these logging
> additions would prefer someone else to do purely so they get reviewed by
> someone else in the process to ensure I didn't stuff up.
Here is the list of things I still need to backport. Fixes have already
been committed to trunk.
MODPYTHON-77
The Simplified GIL Aquisition patches.
MODPYTHON-94
Support for optional mod_ssl functions on request object.
MODPYTHON-131
Make mutex directory configurable.
MODPYTHON-145
Make number of mutex locks configurable at apache startup
MODPYTHON-137
Add req.server.get_options() for obtain PythonOption values set at
global level.
MODPYTHON-93
Improved FieldStorage
The backports shouldn't take more than an hour and I can likely get to
them tommorow. I'd do it now but my head is not entirely clean (too
sleepy) so I'd better wait until morning.
That just leaves the review and backporting of the logging stuff, and
deciding if we need to worry about the auth test failure issue for
apache 2.2.
Once we sort those out I'll be able to roll a tarball that we can offer
as a release candidate. I'm heading out of town on Thursday so if I
don't get to it by then it'll have to wait until next Monday.
Jim
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
| Is there any of these you would like me to do, perhaps 77, 94 or 137
since I am familiar with the code?
Not knowing what you are up to, wary of just going ahead and doing
any in case you are already doing it.
Any hints on how to use subversion to merge diff automatically from
the other branch?
Graham
On 11/04/2006, at 12:47 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Here is the list of things I still need to backport. Fixes have
> already been committed to trunk.
>
> MODPYTHON-77
> The Simplified GIL Aquisition patches.
>
> MODPYTHON-94
> Support for optional mod_ssl functions on request object.
>
> MODPYTHON-131
> Make mutex directory configurable.
>
> MODPYTHON-145
> Make number of mutex locks configurable at apache startup
>
> MODPYTHON-137
> Add req.server.get_options() for obtain PythonOption values set at
> global level.
>
> MODPYTHON-93
> Improved FieldStorage
>
> The backports shouldn't take more than an hour and I can likely get to
> them tommorow. I'd do it now but my head is not entirely clean (too
> sleepy) so I'd better wait until morning.
>
> That just leaves the review and backporting of the logging stuff, and
> deciding if we need to worry about the auth test failure issue for
> apache 2.2.
>
> Once we sort those out I'll be able to roll a tarball that we can
> offer as a release candidate. I'm heading out of town on Thursday so
> if I don't get to it by then it'll have to wait until next Monday.
>
> Jim
>
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
| Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> Is there any of these you would like me to do, perhaps 77, 94 or 137
> since I am familiar with the code?
>
> Not knowing what you are up to, wary of just going ahead and doing
> any in case you are already doing it.
I had a customer app blow up on me right at the end of the work day, so
the spare time I thought I had is rapidly burning away. I'm not likely
to get to the mod_python stuff in the next 24 hours so go ahead.
> Any hints on how to use subversion to merge diff automatically from
> the other branch?
I'll send you my bash script off list. It's a little too ugly to be
shown in public. ;)
Jim
> Graham
>
> On 11/04/2006, at 12:47 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
>
>
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
|
On 11/04/2006, at 12:47 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Here is the list of things I still need to backport. Fixes have
> already been committed to trunk.
>
> MODPYTHON-77
> The Simplified GIL Aquisition patches.
Jim, you must be coding in your sleep and thus not knowing what you are
doing as MODPYTHON-77 was back ported into 3.2.X branch back in March.
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=383731
One less thing to do at least. ;-)
Graham
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
|
On 11/04/2006, at 12:47 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> Here is the list of things I still need to backport. Fixes have
> already been committed to trunk.
>
> MODPYTHON-77
> The Simplified GIL Aquisition patches.
Was already done.
> MODPYTHON-94
> Support for optional mod_ssl functions on request object.
>
> MODPYTHON-131
> Make mutex directory configurable.
>
> MODPYTHON-145
> Make number of mutex locks configurable at apache startup
>
> MODPYTHON-137
> Add req.server.get_options() for obtain PythonOption values set at
> global level
All the above now done.
> MODPYTHON-93
> Improved FieldStorage
Not yet done.
Also haven't done logging additions listed under MODPYTHON-158.
Time for me to sleep, so I will pass the baton on for the moment. ;-)
At this point, if there is anything else that anyone feels should be
back ported from
the 3.3 development tree to 3.2.x branch, speak now or forever hold
your peace.
If you are unsure of what work has been done on 3.3 so far, see
resolved issues:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...Navigator.jspa?
reset=true&pid=10640&status=5
At this point, we are probably only after changes which have some
impact and
would be better addressed now rather than later. Thus, feel free to
put your case,
but don't get too carried away.
Graham
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
|
On 12/04/2006, at 10:13 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> On 11/04/2006, at 12:47 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> Not yet done.
>
> Also haven't done logging additions listed under MODPYTHON-158.
Now also both done.
> At this point, if there is anything else that anyone feels should
> be back ported from
> the 3.3 development tree to 3.2.x branch, speak now or forever hold
> your peace.
>
> If you are unsure of what work has been done on 3.3 so far, see
> resolved issues:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...Navigator.jspa?
> reset=true&pid=10640&status=5
>
> At this point, we are probably only after changes which have some
> impact and
> would be better addressed now rather than later. Thus, feel free to
> put your case,
> but don't get too carried away.
I can see maybe a few little things that could also be done, but I'll
post about
that tomorrow as getting late again and time for me to get some
sleep. :-)
Graham
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-04-18, 12:06 am |
| Sorry I haven't been much use on getting 3.2.9 ready. Unfortunately I've
run out of time and won't be able to pitch in until Monday.
Jim
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2006, at 10:13 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
>
> Now also both done.
>
>
>
> I can see maybe a few little things that could also be done, but I'll
> post about
> that tomorrow as getting late again and time for me to get some sleep. :-)
>
> Graham
>
|
|
|
|
|