|
Home > Archive > Apache Mod-Python > July 2006 > mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing
|
|
| Jim Gallacher 2006-06-30, 1:11 am |
| The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
- just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
packaging.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
personally).
The files are (temporarily) available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...ython-3.2.9.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...n-3.2.9.tgz.md5
Please download it, then do the usual
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
Then (as non-root user!)
$ cd test
$ Python test.py
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
the test output, and suggestions, if any).
Please present your test results in the following format:
+1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
For example:
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
extract this information automatically. 
Thank you for your assistance,
Jim Gallacher
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-06-30, 1:11 am |
| +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...ython-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...n-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ Python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
>
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-06-30, 1:11 am |
| +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...ython-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...n-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ Python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
>
| |
| Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T 2006-06-30, 1:11 am |
| +1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
On 6/29/06, Jim Gallacher <jpg@jgassociates.ca> wrote:
> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.06 Dapper Drake, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>
> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
>
| |
| Nicolas Lehuen 2006-06-30, 7:12 am |
| I've got :
+1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
But, and it's my fault for not having tested this for a long time :
-1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4.3
Only two tests fail but with a segfault, it's test_srv_register_cleanup and
test_apache_register_cleanup. This is not really surprising... I think we
should go ahead and release the 3.2.9 version, while filing a known bug
regarding the fact that we drop the support for those two functions. If we
accept this, then it's a +1.
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/6/30, Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <jeffh@dundeemt.com>:
>
> +1 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2, Apache 2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>
> On 6/29/06, Jim Gallacher <jpg@jgassociates.ca> wrote:
> 2.4.3
> anyway
> and
> _this_
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...ython-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...n-3.2.9.tgz.md5
> they
> Python,
>
>
> --
> Jeff Hinrichs
> Dundee Media & Technology, Inc
> jeffh@dundeemt.com
> 402.320.0821
>
| |
| Ron Reisor 2006-06-30, 1:12 pm |
| +1 MacOSX 10.4.7 Intel, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/prefork), Python-2.4.2
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <ron@udel.edu> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E FF 3B B9 7C 2C
| |
| Colin Bean 2006-06-30, 7:12 pm |
| +1 Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.0 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
| |
| Jorey Bump 2006-07-02, 1:21 pm |
| +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...ython-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallache...n-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ Python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
>
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-07-02, 1:21 pm |
| +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
+1 MacOSX 10.4.6 PPC, Apache-2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python-2.3.5
On 30/06/2006, at 12:52 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.2.9 tarball is available for testing.
>
> This tarball is unchanged from 3.2.9-rc3, but should be retested
> anyway
> - just in case something went pair-shaped in the process of tagging
> and
> packaging.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_
> list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me
> personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> mod_python-3.2.9.tgz.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ cd test
> $ Python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if
> they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm,
> Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically.
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
|
|