|
Home > Archive > Apache Mod-Python > July 2006 > Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Core Vote (Re: mod_python 3.2.9 available for testing)
|
|
| Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy 2006-07-31, 1:12 am |
|
Sorry for the late response - I was trying to have a "vacation" - that's
when you are geographically in a different place with slow internet access
and read only "some" of your e-mail.... ;-)
+1 for core vote (with the note about the 2.2.2 XP SP2 issue).
Grisha
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
> On 08/07/2006, at 4:26 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
>
> The issue with server cleanups failing and why is covered by:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-109
>
>
| |
| Jim Gallacher 2006-07-31, 7:12 am |
| We decided to fix the memory leak in parse_qsl and move on to 3.2.10,
which has been tested and currently has +3 core votes. All we need now
is the official release. One of these days I'll sort out my GPG keys so
I can sign these things myself but in the mean time we'll need your
help, Grisha.
Main 3.2.10 feature is Apache 2.2 support, plus bug fixes.
Tarball and Win binaries are here:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
Jim
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late response - I was trying to have a "vacation" - that's
> when you are geographically in a different place with slow internet
> access and read only "some" of your e-mail.... ;-)
>
> +1 for core vote (with the note about the 2.2.2 XP SP2 issue).
>
> Grisha
>
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>
>
| |
| Nicolas Lehuen 2006-07-31, 7:12 am |
| Note that the problem with Apache 2.2 on Windows XP SP2 seems to have
disappeared, though I can't see how this is possible, unless Graham fixed
something  .
The problem was more probably due to an Apache 2.2 setup glitch.
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/7/31, Jim Gallacher <jpg@jgassociates.ca>:
>
> We decided to fix the memory leak in parse_qsl and move on to 3.2.10,
> which has been tested and currently has +3 core votes. All we need now
> is the official release. One of these days I'll sort out my GPG keys so
> I can sign these things myself but in the mean time we'll need your
> help, Grisha.
>
> Main 3.2.10 feature is Apache 2.2 support, plus bug fixes.
>
> Tarball and Win binaries are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/
> http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
>
> Jim
>
> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> 2.4.3
> test_srv_register_cleanup
> you
> by
> me
> each
> the
> in
> to
>
>
| |
| Graham Dumpleton 2006-07-31, 7:12 pm |
| Nicolas Lehuen wrote ..
> Note that the problem with Apache 2.2 on Windows XP SP2 seems to have
> disappeared, though I can't see how this is possible, unless Graham fixed
> something .
>
> The problem was more probably due to an Apache 2.2 setup glitch.
Not necessarily a glitch. The whole problem with the registration of server
cleanup functions was that whether it would cause a problem/hang/crash
was random. It just depended on what the Apache child process was doing
at the time the signal came from the parent process to shut it down. In
some respects the Win32 platform would have fared a bit better than UNIX
as on Win32 a signal handler is actually executed as a distinct thread where
as on UNIX it just suspends all running code and then blindly executes the
signal handler code.
We still need to disable the server cleanup execution, it just has too much
potential for problems.
Graham
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Regards,
> Nicolas
>
> 2006/7/31, Jim Gallacher <jpg@jgassociates.ca>:
> so
> I
> a
> well
> (and
> not
> if
> in
|
|
|
|
|