Mozilla Browser - OT sigs was Re: Thunderbird spam filtering

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Mozilla Browser > October 2005 > OT sigs was Re: Thunderbird spam filtering





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author OT sigs was Re: Thunderbird spam filtering
Leonidas Jones

2005-10-24, 3:22 pm

In-Reply-To: < _budneiyw5cRQMHenZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast
.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <Ec67f.492275$5N3.24130@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 55325b99774ee124ef44fc53b9911f3a
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1130164132 55325b99774ee124ef44fc53b9911f3a (Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:28:52 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:28:52 GMT
Organization: AT&T Worldnet
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:28:52 GMT
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com alt.fan.mozilla:24452

Stubby wrote:
> Leonidas Jones wrote:
>
> I was brought up to believe that polite people do not discuss religeon,
> politics or sex in public.


It wasn't a discussion, it was a Bible quote in a sig.

There is nothing wrong with discussing religion of politics, or even
sex, if done in the appropriate venue. I agree though, that this is not
the appropriate venue.

Still, its just a Bible quote in a sig. Someone else may choose to
quote Shakespeare, or put in links to web sites that interest them, but
are not germane to the tech support nature of this group. As long as
they don't get too big, I don't see the harm in it.

Lee
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com